Jurisdictions › Bangladesh

Bangladesh

National jurisdiction

Do not enter — total prohibition, no licensing pathway, escalating criminal and payment-interdiction enforcement.

1 open · 19 closed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 5 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • PokerProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • BingoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • LotteryState monopoly (sole exception to a general prohibition)
    Closed
  • Sports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Other event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Horse and greyhound racing bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Esports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Exchange bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Pool bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Virtual event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Fantasy sportsProhibited
    Closed
  • Skill gamesProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Pure skill: grey_zone
  • Prediction marketsProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • SweepstakesProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Free alternative no consideration draw: outside_perimeter
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Models agree
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Affiliate marketingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Payments for gamblingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Class-level certainty is graded for 17 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Bangladesh is a total-prohibition market with no lawful entry pathway and an actively escalating criminal-enforcement posture.

What has changed

  • The Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 (s.20, promulgated 21 May 2025) closed the former online grey zone, criminalising creating, operating, promoting or advertising any online gambling platform with up to 2 years' imprisonment and a BDT 10m fine. The NCSA, CID and BTRC have since blocked 4,613 sites, 447 apps and ~16,000 social links, suspended 5,179 SIMs, and referred 1,000+ MFS agents to Bangladesh Bank for licence revocation.

What to do now

  • Do not enter, supply, affiliate-market, or process payments for any gambling activity touching Bangladeshi residents. Screen player files for BD-origin flows and remediate. Treat any BD exposure as an indefensible AML and criminal risk; escalate to counsel before any action.

What to watch

  • The Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026), enacted 1 July 2026 to replace the 159-year-old Public Gambling Act 1867, defines online gambling and asserts jurisdiction over foreign-hosted platforms — a tightening, not a liberalisation. Monitor enforcement rollout under the new Act and Bangladesh Bank transaction-monitoring deployment.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Unfavourable

Bangladesh enacted the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026), published in the Gazette Extraordinary on 1 July 2026 and effective immediately under section 1(2), repealing the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in full. The new Act is a comprehensive criminal prohibition regime rather than a lic…

Full analysis · 125 words

Bangladesh enacted the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026), published in the Gazette Extraordinary on 1 July 2026 and effective immediately under section 1(2), repealing the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in full. The new Act is a comprehensive criminal prohibition regime rather than a licensing framework, reaching physical gambling, online and remote gambling, online betting, bookmaking, match and spot-fixing, gambling advertising and promotion, and crypto-enabled gambling-money-flow conduct. There is no licensed operator class and no regulator administering an authorisation regime; the state's posture is prohibition backed by severe custodial and financial penalties, non-bailable offence classification, and a dedicated Cyber Tribunal. Parallel financial-sector enforcement through large-scale mobile-financial-service account freezes indicates the prohibition is being actively enforced rather than left as a legislative statement.

  • Total prohibition of private gambling under the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (which repealed the Public Gambling Act 1867) + Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20
  • No licensing pathway of any kind
  • Punitive criminal enforcement (NCSA/CID/BTRC) and MFS account freezes
  • ~90% Muslim-majority OIC member — liberalisation politically near-impossible
  • Crypto fully banned; no legal payment rail
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Unfavourable

The Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026) is primary legislation, gazetted on 1 July 2026 and in force immediately under section 1(2), which repeals the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in its entirety. It establishes offences across gambling, online gambling, online betting, bookmaking and fi…

Full analysis · 120 words

The Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026) is primary legislation, gazetted on 1 July 2026 and in force immediately under section 1(2), which repeals the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in its entirety. It establishes offences across gambling, online gambling, online betting, bookmaking and fixing but creates no licence category, issuing authority, application process or renewal mechanism of any kind. Where licensed jurisdictions pair a prohibition on unlicensed activity with a route to lawful authorisation, this Act supplies only the prohibition: there is no mechanism by which an operator, however structured, could obtain lawful standing to offer gambling products to Bangladeshi consumers. The statute supersedes the prior colonial-era framework entirely rather than modernising it into a regulated system.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Unfavourable

Market entry is not possible. The framework criminalises creating, operating or promoting online gambling platforms, with severe AML exposure for any operator or PSP processing Bangladeshi player payments. The underground market operates via local MFS agents and offshore platforms with significant l…

Full analysis · 43 words

Market entry is not possible. The framework criminalises creating, operating or promoting online gambling platforms, with severe AML exposure for any operator or PSP processing Bangladeshi player payments. The underground market operates via local MFS agents and offshore platforms with significant law-enforcement risk.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Unfavourable

Not applicable. No licensed private gambling market exists, so there are no application or annual fees, capitalisation requirements or guarantees.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Unfavourable

Not applicable for private operators. No licensed commercial gambling exists, so there is no GGR/turnover/stake tax base for private operators. Government lottery and prize-bond revenues, and horse-racing proceeds, accrue to the state. Independent sources confirm no defined gambling tax base (e.g. G…

Full analysis · 47 words

Not applicable for private operators. No licensed commercial gambling exists, so there is no GGR/turnover/stake tax base for private operators. Government lottery and prize-bond revenues, and horse-racing proceeds, accrue to the state. Independent sources confirm no defined gambling tax base (e.g. GGR or turnover) exists in Bangladesh.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Unfavourable

No legal gambling payment channel exists. Mobile financial services (bKash, Nagad, Rocket) dominate digital rails and are the primary collection layer for illegal gambling, but Bangladesh Bank has driven MFS account freezes and deployed real-time transaction-monitoring software, with the CID referri…

Full analysis · 83 words

No legal gambling payment channel exists. Mobile financial services (bKash, Nagad, Rocket) dominate digital rails and are the primary collection layer for illegal gambling, but Bangladesh Bank has driven MFS account freezes and deployed real-time transaction-monitoring software, with the CID referring 1,000+ MFS agents for licence revocation. Cryptocurrency is fully banned (Bangladesh Bank notices under FERA 1947, MLPA 2012 and ATA 2009), so it is not a safe or legal rail. Any PSP processing BD-origin gambling transactions faces indefensible AML and regulatory exposure.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Unfavourable

All gambling marketing to Bangladeshi consumers is prohibited. Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20 expressly criminalises promoting or advertising online gambling, including directly or indirectly via Facebook, Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, X (Twitter) and TikTok. The High Court has directed urgent acti…

Full analysis · 73 words

All gambling marketing to Bangladeshi consumers is prohibited. Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20 expressly criminalises promoting or advertising online gambling, including directly or indirectly via Facebook, Google, YouTube, WhatsApp, X (Twitter) and TikTok. The High Court has directed urgent action against gambling advertising and, in April 2025, ordered a committee to investigate celebrity endorsements of gambling platforms. BTRC has blocked nearly 16,000 gambling-related social-media links. No advertising, sponsorship or affiliate activity is permissible.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Unfavourable

Section 12 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 criminalises the use of VPNs, mirror sites, hosting services and content-delivery-network infrastructure to facilitate gambling activity, with section 23 attaching penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment and a fine of up to Tk 5 crore to this cond…

Full analysis · 119 words

Section 12 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 criminalises the use of VPNs, mirror sites, hosting services and content-delivery-network infrastructure to facilitate gambling activity, with section 23 attaching penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment and a fine of up to Tk 5 crore to this conduct. The provision extends liability beyond the operator placing bets to the technical intermediaries and infrastructure providers whose services enable continued access to gambling platforms, including offshore-hosted ones reaching Bangladeshi users through circumvention technology. There is no certification, standards-conformance or technical-compliance regime of the kind found in licensed markets; the Act's only technical-facing provision is this facilitation offence, which functions as an enforcement lever against infrastructure rather than a compliance pathway for operators.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Unfavourable

Section 11 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 criminalises misleading promotion, false profit promises, enticing advertisements, sponsorship, affiliate marketing and referral campaigns for gambling, with section 22 fixing penalties of up to three years' imprisonment, a fine of up to Tk 50 lakh, or…

Full analysis · 122 words

Section 11 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 criminalises misleading promotion, false profit promises, enticing advertisements, sponsorship, affiliate marketing and referral campaigns for gambling, with section 22 fixing penalties of up to three years' imprisonment, a fine of up to Tk 50 lakh, or both. The class of persons exposed is defined broadly to include any person, institution, media outlet, digital platform, influencer, artist, player or celebrity engaging in this promotional conduct, extending liability well beyond the operator itself to the full distribution and promotional chain. There is no carve-out for platforms acting as intermediaries or for individuals promoting gambling products in a personal or celebrity capacity; the statute treats promotional participation as directly punishable conduct rather than secondary or accessory liability.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Unfavourable

Chapter 3 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 sets penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment and a fine of up to Tk 5 crore for most online offences under sections 16, 17, 20 and 23, rising to ten years and the same fine ceiling under section 24(2) for organised or money-laundering-purpose SIM, …

Full analysis · 196 words

Chapter 3 of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 sets penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment and a fine of up to Tk 5 crore for most online offences under sections 16, 17, 20 and 23, rising to ten years and the same fine ceiling under section 24(2) for organised or money-laundering-purpose SIM, mobile-financial-service or biometric fraud. Repeat offences attract up to double the applicable maximum under section 28. All offences are cognizable, non-bailable and non-compoundable under section 34, with online offences tried by the dedicated Cyber Tribunal under section 32. Courts may confiscate money, property, bank accounts, mobile-financial-service accounts, digital wallets, crypto assets, servers, domains, SIMs and devices connected to an offence under section 29, investigating officers may freeze an accused's accounts with court permission under section 31(2), and gambling premises or server infrastructure may be confiscated under section 18(2). This statutory architecture runs alongside an active financial-sector enforcement campaign: the Finance Minister told Parliament on 25 June 2026 that the Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit had suspended or frozen approximately 55,000 mobile-financial-service accounts linked to online gambling and digital hundi, with a further approximately 14,000 accounts marked for freezing as reported on 3 August 2026.

ConfirmedAI-generated15 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Unfavourable

No liberalisation is conceivable in any foreseeable horizon; the direction is tightening. The Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 closed the online grey zone, and the government has now replaced the 159-year-old Public Gambling Act 1867 with the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026), passed 3…

Full analysis · 85 words

No liberalisation is conceivable in any foreseeable horizon; the direction is tightening. The Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 closed the online grey zone, and the government has now replaced the 159-year-old Public Gambling Act 1867 with the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026), passed 30 June 2026 and effective 1 July 2026 — a tightening reform, not a regulatory opening. OIC membership and a ~90% Muslim-majority population entrench the prohibition. Reform is tied to the parliamentary calendar around the 13th National Parliamentary Election.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 2 enforcement · 26 red flags · 12 sources · Expand full record

Enforcement record

What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 2 recorded events.

  1. 30 Jan 2026
    BTRC · Offshore gambling websites/apps/social links
    Confirmed
    Sources
  2. 1 Jul 2025
    CID · MFS agents (1,000+)
    Probable
    Sources

What gets operators fined

26 red flags (11 high, 10 medium, 2 low) and 5 controls that address them.

  • high
    All gambling advertising/promotion criminalised, incl. social platforms
    No lawful customer-acquisition route.
    Sources
  • high
    BTRC blocks 4,600+ sites, 447 apps, 16,000 social links
    Extensive access interdiction; constant domain rotation required.
    Sources
  • high
    Cryptocurrency fully banned
    Removes crypto as a funding/circumvention rail; FX/AML offence.
    Sources
  • high
    CID links online betting to large-scale money laundering
    Severe AML typology exposure for any PSP touching BD flows.
    Sources
  • high
    NCSA-led multi-agency punitive enforcement
    Active, escalating prosecution posture against operators and agents.
    Sources
  • high
    Reform direction is tightening (1867 Act replacement)
    Planned statute would assert jurisdiction over foreign-hosted platforms.
    Sources
  • high
    Affiliate promotion criminalised
    Affiliates and intermediaries face criminal exposure.
    Sources
  • high
    1,000+ MFS agents referred for licence revocation
    Direct enforcement against the human payment-facilitation layer.
    Sources
  • high
    Bangladesh Bank flags cross-border ML via betting as systemic risk
    Systemic designation drives transaction-monitoring deployment.
    Sources
  • high
    No B2B pathway (absent_no_pathway)
    Software/platform supply has no lawful route and is facilitation.
    Sources
  • high
    No legal addressable operator market
    Commercial attractiveness floored; only illegal exposure available.
    Sources
  • medium
    OIC member, ~90% Muslim-majority
    Liberalisation politically near-impossible for foreseeable horizon.
    Sources
  • medium
    Home-regulator scrutiny of South Asian payment flows
    Reputational/licence risk for licensed operators elsewhere accepting BD players.
    Sources
  • medium
    Gambling apps unavailable on Google Play / App Store for BD
    Forces unsafe sideloading; no compliant distribution path.
    Sources
  • medium
    High Court directives + celebrity-endorsement committee
    Judicial momentum behind enforcement, including marketing.
    Sources
  • medium
    Constitution Art.18(2) directs state to prevent gambling
    Constitutional anchor entrenches prohibition policy.
    Sources
  • medium
    5,179 SIM cards suspended for gambling use
    Telecom-layer enforcement against agents and users.
    Sources
  • medium
    Election-betting platforms targeting BD polls
    Heightened scrutiny period; political-event betting flagged as illegal.
    Sources
  • medium
    Section 21/22 cover gambling-related financial transactions/fraud
    Layered offences capture payment facilitation.
    Sources
  • medium
    Third-party ad networks (Google AdSense) in scope of ban
    Programmatic monetisation of BD traffic is criminalised.
    Sources
  • medium
    Rural migration of gambling harm cited by ministers
    Strong political will sustains and escalates enforcement.
    Sources
  • low
    No private-operator tax base
    Signals total absence of any regulatory accommodation.
    Sources
  • low
    FATF list status unverified from primary source
    Residual diligence gap on AML-list standing.
    Sources
  • critical
    No private gambling licence of any kind exists
    Entry is legally impossible; any operation is criminal.
    Sources
  • critical
    Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20 criminalises online gambling operation/promotion
    Up to 2 years' imprisonment and/or BDT 10m fine.
    Sources
  • critical
    Bangladesh Bank MFS account freezes and agent licence revocations
    No defensible payment channel; collection layer actively dismantled.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    BD geo-block at registration
    Block account creation and deposits from Bangladeshi IPs/KYC residency to avoid s.20 exposure.
    Sources
  • 002
    BD payment-flow screening
    Screen player files and PSP flows for BD-origin transactions (MFS/crypto); de-risk and remediate.
    Sources
  • 003
    Affiliate/marketing exclusion of BD
    Prohibit affiliates and ad networks from targeting BD; remove Bengali-language gambling creatives.
    Sources
  • 004
    App-distribution geofence
    Exclude BD from app availability; do not provide sideload APKs to BD users.
    Sources
  • 005
    Home-regulator exposure register
    Maintain a register of inadvertent BD exposure for MGA/UKGC disclosure and remediation.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

An MGA-licensed operator notices BD-origin deposits via a payment aggregator.

BD players are served in breach of Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20; BD-origin flows create AML typology risk and home-regulator scrutiny.

Do this: Immediately geo-block BD, freeze affected accounts, remediate and disclose to home regulator.

Sources

A B2B platform supplier is approached to license its software to a 'BD-facing brand'.

No B2B pathway exists (absent_no_pathway); supply would facilitate prohibited activity.

Do this: Decline; document refusal; screen for indirect BD routing.

Sources

An affiliate proposes Bengali-language acquisition campaigns on Meta and Google.

Promotion/advertising of online gambling is criminalised, including via Facebook/Google/YouTube.

Do this: Reject; exclude BD geo and Bengali creatives from affiliate terms.

Sources

A PSP considers onboarding a merchant whose volumes spike around BD election dates.

Election-betting platforms target BD; Bangladesh Bank monitors gambling-linked flows as systemic ML risk.

Do this: Do not onboard; apply enhanced typology screening; file SARs where applicable.

Sources

An operator asks whether crypto deposits sidestep BD prohibition.

Crypto is fully banned in BD under FERA 1947, MLPA 2012 and ATA 2009; it is not a safe rail and compounds offences.

Do this: Do not rely on crypto for BD; treat as additional criminal/FX exposure.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Cost to operate. no private-operator tax base exists (no GGR/turnover rate). headline_rate_pct emitted null.
  • searched: Bangladesh gambling tax rate GGR operator
  • searched: Bangladesh gaming duty private operator
  • searched: Bangladesh lottery horse racing taxation
  • checked: legalpilot.com
Aml cft regime. FATF list status not independently verified from a primary FATF/APG MER source as at research date.
  • searched: Bangladesh FATF grey list 2026
  • searched: APG mutual evaluation Bangladesh
  • searched: Bangladesh FATF status gambling AML
  • checked: thedailystar.net
Competitive landscape. no published unlicensed-market-share % figure for BD illegal gambling.
  • searched: Bangladesh illegal gambling market size estimate
  • searched: Bangladesh online betting turnover estimate
  • searched: Bangladesh gambling GGR illegal market
  • checked: next.io

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 s.20 criminalises online gambling with up to 2 years' imprisonment and/or BDT 10m fine.

BD-CP-001 · T3 of 4 (asserted T1, shown at its source's tier) · published 19 Sep 2025 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources

The Public Gambling Act 1867 - whose s.1A defined 'gaming' to include wagering/betting while excepting sanctioned horse-race betting and excluding lottery - was repealed with immediate effect on 1 July 2026 by s.49(1) of the Gambling Prevention Act, 2026 (Act No. 98 of 2026). The 2026 Act's s.2(6) definition of gambling expressly includes lottery and reproduces no carve-out for government-approved lottery, prize bonds, or sanctioned horse-race betting, so neither carve-out survives.

BD-CP-002 · T1 of 4 · published 7 Jun 2026 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources