Jurisdictions › Belgium

Belgium

National jurisdiction

Market entry is near-impossible for pure-play online operators: an online '+' licence requires holding the corresponding land-based licence, and land-based licences (9 Class A, 180 Class B, 31 F1) are subject to a hard numerus clausus.

2 open · 7 restricted · 5 closed · 4 uncertain · 2 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 25 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • Casino
    Restricted
  • Poker
    Restricted
  • Bingo
    Restricted
  • LotteryState monopoly
    Closed
  • Sports betting
    Restricted
  • Other event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports betting
    Restricted
  • Exchange bettingGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Pool bettingModels agree
    Restricted
  • Virtual event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Fantasy sportsNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • Skill gamesNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • Prediction marketsProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • SweepstakesProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Charitable/philanthropic promotional draw run by a recognised non-profit association: restricted
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Models agree
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BModels agree
    Open
  • Affiliate marketingProhibited
    Closed
  • Payments for gambling
    Restricted

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingGrey zone
    Uncertain

Class-level certainty is graded for 7 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Belgium is a near-closed, tightening market: online entry requires a land-based licence anchor and advertising is almost entirely banned.

What has changed

  • The 2023 advertising Royal Decree, the 2024 statutory blacklist basis, the EUR 200 deposit limit, age-21 minimum, and the 2025/2028 sponsorship phase-out collectively tightened the regime; 2023 GGR reached EUR 1.7bn (+50% in two years).

What to do now

  • Treat Belgium as an acquisition-only market for B2C: secure or partner with an existing land-based A/B/F1 licensee, plan for domestic servers and BGC approval, and abandon advertising-led growth in favour of the narrow search channel. B2B suppliers should pursue a Class E licence.

What to watch

  • The 1 January 2028 full sponsorship ban, any EU internal-market challenge to the land-based anchor, and the outcome of pending fine-legality litigation.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Unfavourable

Belgium's gambling regulatory posture tightened across several fronts this period: a 15 percent rise in the Gaming Commission's annual contribution (the first since 2018), a new mandatory Duty of Care Charter requiring quarterly, auditable player-protection reporting, a new IT-certification and play…

Full analysis · 125 words

Belgium's gambling regulatory posture tightened across several fronts this period: a 15 percent rise in the Gaming Commission's annual contribution (the first since 2018), a new mandatory Duty of Care Charter requiring quarterly, auditable player-protection reporting, a new IT-certification and player-identification obligation taking effect 1 May 2026, and a fresh enforcement cooperation agreement with DNS Belgium against illegal '.be' gambling domains. No single instrument dominates the picture; the cumulative direction is one of tightening. The Gaming Commission, established under the Gambling Act of 7 May 1999, continues to license and supervise the market, but its own disclosed staffing shortfall (32.8 of an 80-FTE target) and a pending proposal to transfer its jurisdiction to the Ministry of Economic Affairs introduce institutional uncertainty alongside the substantive tightening.

  • Land-based anchor required for online licence
  • Numerus clausus (9 Class A licences)
  • Near-total advertising ban
  • Tightening policy direction
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Unfavourable

The Council of Ministers approved, in October 2025, a legislative proposal to transfer Belgian Gaming Commission oversight to the Ministry of Economic Affairs; the Commission moved administratively to that Minister's department in January 2026, ahead of final enacting legislation. This reform is fra…

Full analysis · 153 words

The Council of Ministers approved, in October 2025, a legislative proposal to transfer Belgian Gaming Commission oversight to the Ministry of Economic Affairs; the Commission moved administratively to that Minister's department in January 2026, ahead of final enacting legislation. This reform is fragile in instrument terms -- an approved proposal and an administrative move, not yet primary law -- and no primary-source text of the finalising legislation was located this cycle. Separately, a Royal Decree signed 11 March 2026 raises 2026 operator contributions to Gaming Commission funding by 15%, retroactive to 1 January 2026, under the durable statutory basis of Article 19 of the Gambling Act of 7 May 1999. The increase spans Class A, A+, B, B+, C, E, F1, F1+ and F2 licences. Together these developments mark a structural governance shift and a material cost increase occurring in the same cycle, justifying an amber rating pending finalisation of the enacting legislation.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Unfavourable

Market entry is near-impossible for pure-play online operators: an online '+' licence requires holding the corresponding land-based licence, and land-based licences (9 Class A, 180 Class B, 31 F1) are subject to a hard numerus clausus. The realistic route is acquiring or partnering with an existing …

Full analysis · 59 words

Market entry is near-impossible for pure-play online operators: an online '+' licence requires holding the corresponding land-based licence, and land-based licences (9 Class A, 180 Class B, 31 F1) are subject to a hard numerus clausus. The realistic route is acquiring or partnering with an existing land-based licensee. Time-to-launch is long; a Belgian entity and domestic servers are required.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Favourable

2024 annual contributions range from EUR 22,085 (Class A / G1) down to EUR 123 (G2). Nominal fees are moderate by EU standards, but the requirement that an online '+' licence be anchored to a land-based Class A casino or Class B arcade makes effective capital intensity very high.

05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Gaming tax is a regional matter. The Walloon region taxes GGR at 11%; the Flemish and Brussels-Capital regions tax betting GGR at 15% and casino games at tiered 33%/44% rates. Online gambling is commonly cited at 11% GGR. Since 2024 regional gaming taxes are no longer deductible expenses. Gambling s…

Full analysis · 57 words

Gaming tax is a regional matter. The Walloon region taxes GGR at 11%; the Flemish and Brussels-Capital regions tax betting GGR at 15% and casino games at tiered 33%/44% rates. Online gambling is commonly cited at 11% GGR. Since 2024 regional gaming taxes are no longer deductible expenses. Gambling services are VAT-exempt; corporate income tax is 25%.

06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Mixed

Standard debit and credit cards are permitted; loans/credit for stakes are prohibited under Article 58. The BGC has cautioned operators on crypto AML/CFT risk. The default deposit limit was reduced to EUR 200. PSP access for licensed operators is adequate; offshore operators serving Belgium face pay…

Full analysis · 47 words

Standard debit and credit cards are permitted; loans/credit for stakes are prohibited under Article 58. The BGC has cautioned operators on crypto AML/CFT risk. The default deposit limit was reduced to EUR 200. PSP access for licensed operators is adequate; offshore operators serving Belgium face payment-block risk.

07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Unfavourable

The Royal Decree of 27 February 2023 introduced a near-total advertising ban, in force from 1 July 2023, covering TV, radio, cinema, social media, influencers and untargeted email/SMS. Search-engine results for users actively searching gambling terms remain permitted. Sports-stadium advertising was …

Full analysis · 89 words

The Royal Decree of 27 February 2023 introduced a near-total advertising ban, in force from 1 July 2023, covering TV, radio, cinema, social media, influencers and untargeted email/SMS. Search-engine results for users actively searching gambling terms remain permitted. Sports-stadium advertising was banned from 1 January 2025; shirt sponsorship is restricted (logo only, max 75 cm², not on front) until a full ban on 1 January 2028. The 1 September 2024 Gaming Act amendment established a principled advertising ban unless authorised by Royal Decree. The National Lottery is largely exempt.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Mixed

From 1 May 2026, F2-licensed newspaper retailers offering mobile or off-premises betting must use the EPIS Excluded Persons Information System, extending the identity-verification regime established under Article 54/1 of the Act of 7 May 2024, which already applied to other licence classes from 1 Ma…

Full analysis · 91 words

From 1 May 2026, F2-licensed newspaper retailers offering mobile or off-premises betting must use the EPIS Excluded Persons Information System, extending the identity-verification regime established under Article 54/1 of the Act of 7 May 2024, which already applied to other licence classes from 1 May 2025. This is a durable, statute-based obligation rather than discretionary guidance, and it represents a scope-tightening compliance change for the F2 licence class specifically: a previously less-covered retail channel is now brought fully within the excluded-persons identity-verification framework that governs the rest of the licensed sector.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Unfavourable

Belgium requires each licensed online gambling product category to be hosted on a separate website, with separate player accounts and a prohibition on transferring funds or accounts between licences. Constitutional Court judgment 165/2025 annulled this separate-websites requirement, finding that it …

Full analysis · 138 words

Belgium requires each licensed online gambling product category to be hosted on a separate website, with separate player accounts and a prohibition on transferring funds or accounts between licences. Constitutional Court judgment 165/2025 annulled this separate-websites requirement, finding that it discriminated against comparable National Lottery products that were left outside the same segregation discipline. The Court deferred the effect of the annulment to 31 December 2026, so the obligation continues to bind licensed online operators until that date. Operators should plan their platform architecture on the assumption that the requirement remains enforceable through the end of 2026, while tracking what, if anything, is enacted to replace it once the annulment takes effect. The ruling does not touch licence eligibility or product-class status; it addresses only how licensed online products must be technically and administratively separated from one another.

10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

The Gaming Commission signed a cooperation agreement with DNS Belgium to improve detection of illegal gambling sites operating under '.be' domains, extending its enforcement reach against unlicensed distribution. This expansion in enforcement tooling occurs alongside a disclosed capacity constraint:…

Full analysis · 139 words

The Gaming Commission signed a cooperation agreement with DNS Belgium to improve detection of illegal gambling sites operating under '.be' domains, extending its enforcement reach against unlicensed distribution. This expansion in enforcement tooling occurs alongside a disclosed capacity constraint: the Commission's own opinion of 27 October 2025 states staffing at 32.8 of an 80-FTE target, prompting a risk-based supervisory approach that prioritises the largest operators by gross gaming yield. Smaller licensees may see less day-to-day supervisory attention in the near term, though the Duty of Care Charter and new IT-certification obligation apply across licence classes without an announced size-based carve-out. Belgium's enforcement theory for unlicensed operation rests on the statutory licensing stack established under the Gambling Act of 7 May 1999; the DNS cooperation agreement is a new secondary enforcement vector (domain-level blocking/detection) layered onto that primary statutory basis.

ConfirmedAI-generated5 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Unfavourable

The policy direction is continued tightening, driven by a strong harm-reduction consensus. Deposit limits were cut from EUR 500 to EUR 200, the minimum age raised to 21, and the 2028 sponsorship ban is in train. The tied-to-land-based model faces latent EU internal-market questions but no active Com…

Full analysis · 58 words

The policy direction is continued tightening, driven by a strong harm-reduction consensus. Deposit limits were cut from EUR 500 to EUR 200, the minimum age raised to 21, and the 2028 sponsorship ban is in train. The tied-to-land-based model faces latent EU internal-market questions but no active Commission challenge. No significant liberalisation is expected in the near term.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 26 red flags · 12 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

26 red flags (9 high, 10 medium, 4 low) and 0 controls that address them.

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

Malta-licensed online casino wishes to serve Belgian players.

No online licence is available without a Belgian land-based anchor; targeting BE players unlicensed risks blacklisting and fines.

Do this: Do not target Belgium without acquiring a land-based A licensee.

Sources

Operator wants to advertise on social media in Belgium.

Social media and influencer advertising are prohibited under the 2023 Royal Decree.

Do this: Limit promotion to search results and own website.

Sources

Game studio wants to supply slots to a Belgian casino.

Supplying requires a Class E licence and BGC approval; games need pre-launch approval.

Do this: Apply for Class E licence before supply.

Sources

Operator plans shirt sponsorship of a Belgian football club in 2027.

Limited logo-only sponsorship is permitted until 2028, after which it is fully banned.

Do this: Do not build a long-term strategy on sponsorship; plan exit by 2028.

Sources

Operator offers crypto deposits to Belgian players.

BGC has flagged crypto AML/CFT risk; enhanced due diligence applies under the 2017 AML Law.

Do this: Apply enhanced AML controls or avoid crypto rails.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Competitive landscape. licensed_operator_count and unlicensed market share not available as named T1/T2 figures in retrieved sources.
  • searched: Belgium Gaming Commission licensed operator count 2025
  • searched: Belgium online gambling channelisation rate
  • searched: Belgium unlicensed gambling market share percentage
  • checked: gamingcommission.be

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.