Enforcement record
What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 2 recorded events.
6 Feb 2026
DOJ Bureau of Gambling Control · licensed cardrooms / TPPPs
Confirmed
Sources Available to subscribers3 Jul 2025
California Attorney General · paid DFS operators
Confirmed
Sources Available to subscribers
What gets operators fined
4 red flags (2 high, 1 medium) and 0 controls that address them.
- high
Promotion or affiliate marketing of sweepstakes-casino products to CA residents
AB 831 extends criminal and civil liability to affiliates/media partners who knowingly promote violating platforms.
Sources Available to subscribers - high
Offering paid DFS contests to CA users post-July 2025 AG opinion
AG has formally opined this constitutes illegal sports wagering, materially raising enforcement risk even absent an injunction.
Sources Available to subscribers - medium
Relying on TPPP-facilitated cardroom blackjack continuing unchanged
Underlying regulations were only enjoined/voided at trial-court level; appellate reversal could revive restrictions with short compliance windows.
Sources Available to subscribers - critical
Any claim of a licensed online casino or sportsbook in California
CGCC has explicitly confirmed no such licence has ever been issued and warns such claims are frequently fraudulent.
Sources Available to subscribers
Worked scenarios
5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.
Offshore sweepstakes-casino operator continues serving California users after Jan 1 2026
Operation constitutes a criminal misdemeanor under Penal Code §337o; any supporting vendor (payments, geolocation, media) who knowingly assists is separately exposed.
Do this: Immediate geo-block of California IPs; cease all CA-directed marketing.
Sources Available to subscribersNational DFS operator continues offering pick'em contests to CA users post-AG opinion
The AG's July 2025 opinion is non-binding as a matter of pure law but signals active enforcement intent; continued operation carries material regulatory risk even without a court order.
Do this: Conduct legal risk assessment; consider phased CA exit or product redesign to avoid 'wagering on sporting events' characterization.
Sources Available to subscribersVendor supplies TPPP banking services to a California cardroom for blackjack-style games
Currently permitted following the June 2026 trial-court ruling voiding Bureau restrictions, but the underlying regulatory dispute remains on appeal; vendor should not assume long-term stability.
Do this: Build contractual flexibility/exit clauses tied to the appellate outcome of CGA v. Bonta.
Sources Available to subscribersPrediction-market platform (CFTC-regulated) offers sports event contracts to CA residents
Operator relies on federal preemption via CFTC designation; California tribal gaming interests dispute this characterization, creating unresolved legal exposure.
Do this: Monitor ongoing federal litigation and tribal challenges before treating CA as a stable market.
Sources Available to subscribersSoftware supplier seeks a B2B online-gambling licence in California
No B2B online-gambling licence pathway exists in California; the only licensable roles are cardroom/TPPP/tribal-vendor suitability approvals, none of which cover online real-money gambling software.
Do this: Do not pursue direct CA online B2B licensure; redirect to physical cardroom/tribal vendor relationships if applicable.
Sources Available to subscribersWhat we looked for and could not find
Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.
Market opportunity. no T1/T2-published aggregate GGR figure for California tribal + cardroom + lottery gaming found within search budget; only third-party revenue estimates (cardroom $1.4B, tribal $12B per industry-association-sourced figures) were located.
- searched: California gambling market size GGR 2025 2026
- searched: California tribal casino revenue official report
- searched: California cardroom gross gaming revenue state report
- checked: cgcc.ca.gov
Aml cft regime. no California-specific FinCEN/FATF MER citation or state reporting-threshold figure resolved (California gaming AML obligations largely derive from federal BSA framework, not state statute).
- searched: California gambling AML reporting threshold statute
- searched: FinCEN California casino card club reporting requirement
- searched: California cardroom Bank Secrecy Act compliance
- checked: fincen.gov
Tribal compacts[]. full NIGC-class compact roster (individual tribes, Class II/III splits, expiry/renewal dates) not resolved within this run's search budget; California has dozens of individually negotiated compacts.
- searched: California tribal gaming compact list NIGC 2026
- searched: California tribal-state compact expiry renewal register
- searched: NIGC California compact class III list
- checked: nigc.gov
Competitive landscape. unlicensed_market_share_estimate_pct not available from any T1/T2 published source within search budget.
- searched: California unlicensed offshore gambling market share estimate
- searched: California illegal online casino usage statistics
- searched: California gray market gambling report
- checked: cgcc.ca.gov
Source register
Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.
Full evidence is available to subscribers — every source, claim and date.
Subscribe → · Sign in