01 · What kind of market is this?
MixedCameroon's online-gambling regime saw two material developments this cycle against an otherwise unchanged licensing backdrop. All online-gambling payment flows now route exclusively through a single MINAT-designated aggregator, INTOUCH Cameroun, following a January 2025 directive, and a new 3 percen…
Full analysis · 96 words
Cameroon's online-gambling regime saw two material developments this cycle against an otherwise unchanged licensing backdrop. All online-gambling payment flows now route exclusively through a single MINAT-designated aggregator, INTOUCH Cameroun, following a January 2025 directive, and a new 3 percent digital tax reaches unlicensed offshore platforms with significant economic presence from January 2026. The underlying authorisation statute (Law No. 2015/012 and Decree No. 2019/2300/PM) remains untouched. Together the payments centralisation and the new offshore tax represent a tightening of the operating environment even though the formal licensing gateway is unchanged, justifying an amber posture for this cycle.
- FATF grey-listing (since June 2023, ongoing) requiring EDD
- Ministerial ad-hoc intervention risk (Feb 2025 deposit-ban precedent)
- Mandatory single-aggregator (InTouch) payment routing
02 · Can we get a licence?
MixedOperating any money game in Cameroon requires falling under one of three statutory regimes set by Law n° 2015/012: concession (casinos, betting, public lotteries), authorisation (online and commercial games) and declaration (private lotteries). Online operation specifically requires ministerial auth…
Full analysis · 107 words
Operating any money game in Cameroon requires falling under one of three statutory regimes set by Law n° 2015/012: concession (casinos, betting, public lotteries), authorisation (online and commercial games) and declaration (private lotteries). Online operation specifically requires ministerial authorisation, with the ARJ supervising day-to-day. Operating an online gaming activity without authorisation is a criminal offence punishable by 6 months–2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of CFA 5–25 million. Operators must be locally incorporated, hold a .cm domain and (for online) post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. Licences run 5 years (online) and 10 years (land-based) and are non-transferable. No distinct B2B supplier licence class is established.
03 · How hard is entry, really?
MixedEntry is possible under the Law 2015/012 authorisation regime but requires navigating ministerial process variability, FATF-driven EDD, the InTouch payment mandate, and unverified online-licensing practice. Key steps: local incorporation, ministerial authorisation for online games, ARJ registration,…
Full analysis · 56 words
Entry is possible under the Law 2015/012 authorisation regime but requires navigating ministerial process variability, FATF-driven EDD, the InTouch payment mandate, and unverified online-licensing practice. Key steps: local incorporation, ministerial authorisation for online games, ARJ registration, ANIF AML activity statement, .cm domain, CFA 200m bank guarantee, and an InTouch payment arrangement. No exchange controls restrict repatriation.
04 · What do the licences cost?
MixedSpecific ARJ application and annual fee schedules are set by Décret 2019/2300/PM but are published only in French and were not retrieved in primary form. For online licences operators must post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. No exchange controls restrict fee repatriation. Fees are expected to be …
Full analysis · 58 words
Specific ARJ application and annual fee schedules are set by Décret 2019/2300/PM but are published only in French and were not retrieved in primary form. For online licences operators must post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. No exchange controls restrict fee repatriation. Fees are expected to be in the low/average band for Francophone Africa but remain unverified.
05 · What is the tax take?
MixedCasino gaming is taxed at 15% of gross gaming revenue. The 2015 law also established a 25% tax on gross win for games excluding gaming machines, with annual per-machine fees of CFA 20,000-100,000 for gaming machines. There are no exchange controls restricting repatriation. Operators also fall under …
Full analysis · 59 words
Casino gaming is taxed at 15% of gross gaming revenue. The 2015 law also established a 25% tax on gross win for games excluding gaming machines, with annual per-machine fees of CFA 20,000-100,000 for gaming machines. There are no exchange controls restricting repatriation. Operators also fall under standard Cameroonian corporate income tax. Precise online-specific GGR treatment is partially verified.
06 · Can we move player money?
MixedMTN Mobile Money (~50% penetration) and Orange Money are the dominant gambling funding channels, but since 30 January 2025 all online gambling payments must route exclusively through the InTouch aggregator. No exchange controls restrict cash transfer in or out of Cameroon. FATF grey-listing requires…
Full analysis · 78 words
MTN Mobile Money (~50% penetration) and Orange Money are the dominant gambling funding channels, but since 30 January 2025 all online gambling payments must route exclusively through the InTouch aggregator. No exchange controls restrict cash transfer in or out of Cameroon. FATF grey-listing requires operators and PSPs to apply enhanced due diligence to Cameroon-connected flows; ANIF is the national FIU receiving STRs and pre-launch activity statements, with COBAC as regional banking supervisor and GABAC the CEMAC AML body.
No gambling-specific advertising statute was identified from primary sources; marketing operates within the general Law 2015/012 framework. The dominant marketing risk is ministerial volatility — the February 2025 deposit-ban incident shows individual ministers can impose sudden ad-hoc restrictions.…
Full analysis · 50 words
No gambling-specific advertising statute was identified from primary sources; marketing operates within the general Law 2015/012 framework. The dominant marketing risk is ministerial volatility — the February 2025 deposit-ban incident shows individual ministers can impose sudden ad-hoc restrictions. Bonus and sponsorship treatment is unverified and should be confirmed with ARJ.
08 · What must the platform meet?
MixedMinisterial authorisation for online games implies a technical review, and operators must maintain a .cm domain and local representation. No explicit server-location/hosting requirement is codified, though the .cm and local-presence requirements may imply locally accessible infrastructure. No specif…
Full analysis · 67 words
Ministerial authorisation for online games implies a technical review, and operators must maintain a .cm domain and local representation. No explicit server-location/hosting requirement is codified, though the .cm and local-presence requirements may imply locally accessible infrastructure. No specific RNG certification or geolocation mandate was confirmed. Data protection rests on sector rules under Law 2010/012 (cybersecurity) and Law 2010/013 (electronic communications); there are no dedicated gambling data-protection rules.
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?
MixedThe 15 March 2026 large-taxpayer filing deadline passed for foreign betting and casino platforms to comply with the new three percent digital tax established under the 2026 Finance Law. This is a fiscal-enforcement checkpoint rather than a gambling-licensing enforcement action, and it establishes th…
Full analysis · 141 words
The 15 March 2026 large-taxpayer filing deadline passed for foreign betting and casino platforms to comply with the new three percent digital tax established under the 2026 Finance Law. This is a fiscal-enforcement checkpoint rather than a gambling-licensing enforcement action, and it establishes the first observable compliance cadence under the significant-economic-presence tax regime introduced. The instrument behind this checkpoint is the Finance Law itself, administered through the Directorate General of Taxes rather than through the Ministry of Territorial Administration or the gaming regulator, so it runs on a separate track from the standing licensing gateway. No gambling-licensing enforcement action, revocation, or sanction was identified; the enforcement signal here is specifically about a dated fiscal-compliance deadline having passed for offshore digital gambling platforms, marking the point at which the new tax obligation moved from statutory text into an active, observable administrative cadence.
The dominant regulatory development is the continuing FATF grey listing (since June 2023, reaffirmed February 2026) signalling systemic AML deficiencies that will constrain banking and PSP relationships until resolved. The 2015 Law gives Cameroon a structural advantage over many regional peers, but …
Full analysis · 77 words
The dominant regulatory development is the continuing FATF grey listing (since June 2023, reaffirmed February 2026) signalling systemic AML deficiencies that will constrain banking and PSP relationships until resolved. The 2015 Law gives Cameroon a structural advantage over many regional peers, but ministerial volatility (February 2025 deposit ban) and the new InTouch single-aggregator mandate add operational risk. No significant liberalising or restrictive legislative reform is in train; the trajectory is incremental AML compliance improvement under FATF pressure.