Jurisdictions › Cameroon

Cameroon

National jurisdiction

Conditional entry: codified pathway exists but FATF grey-list friction, mandatory InTouch routing and ministerial volatility cap attractiveness.

4 open · 4 restricted · 1 closed · 4 uncertain · 7 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 28 Sep 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoModels agree
    Open
  • Poker
    Restricted
  • Bingo
    Restricted
  • Lottery
    Restricted
  • Sports bettingModels agree
    Open
  • Other event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports betting
    Restricted
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sportsGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Skill gamesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • SweepstakesModels agree
    Open
  • Free play
    Not yet assessed

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BContested
    Open
  • Affiliate marketingGrey zone · Contested
    Uncertain
  • Payments for gamblingState monopoly · Contested
    Closed

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingGrey zone
    Uncertain

Class-level certainty is graded for 6 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Cameroon offers a codified but volatile online-gambling pathway under FATF grey-list pressure.

What has changed

  • Since 30 January 2025 all online gambling payments must route through the InTouch aggregator; a February 2025 ministerial deposit ban was imposed then reversed; Cameroon remains FATF grey-listed as at February 2026 with under 40% action-plan completion.

What to do now

  • Treat entry as conditional: secure ministerial authorisation, local incorporation, .cm domain, CFA 200m guarantee, ANIF registration and an InTouch arrangement; budget for enhanced AML due diligence and home-regulator disclosure.

What to watch

  • FATF plenary outcomes (potential delisting trigger), further ministerial interventions, and any ARJ publication of fee schedules or technical standards.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Mixed

Cameroon's online-gambling regime saw two material developments this cycle against an otherwise unchanged licensing backdrop. All online-gambling payment flows now route exclusively through a single MINAT-designated aggregator, INTOUCH Cameroun, following a January 2025 directive, and a new 3 percen…

Full analysis · 96 words

Cameroon's online-gambling regime saw two material developments this cycle against an otherwise unchanged licensing backdrop. All online-gambling payment flows now route exclusively through a single MINAT-designated aggregator, INTOUCH Cameroun, following a January 2025 directive, and a new 3 percent digital tax reaches unlicensed offshore platforms with significant economic presence from January 2026. The underlying authorisation statute (Law No. 2015/012 and Decree No. 2019/2300/PM) remains untouched. Together the payments centralisation and the new offshore tax represent a tightening of the operating environment even though the formal licensing gateway is unchanged, justifying an amber posture for this cycle.

  • FATF grey-listing (since June 2023, ongoing) requiring EDD
  • Ministerial ad-hoc intervention risk (Feb 2025 deposit-ban precedent)
  • Mandatory single-aggregator (InTouch) payment routing
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Mixed

Operating any money game in Cameroon requires falling under one of three statutory regimes set by Law n° 2015/012: concession (casinos, betting, public lotteries), authorisation (online and commercial games) and declaration (private lotteries). Online operation specifically requires ministerial auth…

Full analysis · 107 words

Operating any money game in Cameroon requires falling under one of three statutory regimes set by Law n° 2015/012: concession (casinos, betting, public lotteries), authorisation (online and commercial games) and declaration (private lotteries). Online operation specifically requires ministerial authorisation, with the ARJ supervising day-to-day. Operating an online gaming activity without authorisation is a criminal offence punishable by 6 months–2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of CFA 5–25 million. Operators must be locally incorporated, hold a .cm domain and (for online) post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. Licences run 5 years (online) and 10 years (land-based) and are non-transferable. No distinct B2B supplier licence class is established.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Mixed

Entry is possible under the Law 2015/012 authorisation regime but requires navigating ministerial process variability, FATF-driven EDD, the InTouch payment mandate, and unverified online-licensing practice. Key steps: local incorporation, ministerial authorisation for online games, ARJ registration,…

Full analysis · 56 words

Entry is possible under the Law 2015/012 authorisation regime but requires navigating ministerial process variability, FATF-driven EDD, the InTouch payment mandate, and unverified online-licensing practice. Key steps: local incorporation, ministerial authorisation for online games, ARJ registration, ANIF AML activity statement, .cm domain, CFA 200m bank guarantee, and an InTouch payment arrangement. No exchange controls restrict repatriation.

04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Mixed

Specific ARJ application and annual fee schedules are set by Décret 2019/2300/PM but are published only in French and were not retrieved in primary form. For online licences operators must post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. No exchange controls restrict fee repatriation. Fees are expected to be …

Full analysis · 58 words

Specific ARJ application and annual fee schedules are set by Décret 2019/2300/PM but are published only in French and were not retrieved in primary form. For online licences operators must post a CFA 200 million bank guarantee. No exchange controls restrict fee repatriation. Fees are expected to be in the low/average band for Francophone Africa but remain unverified.

UncertainAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Mixed

Casino gaming is taxed at 15% of gross gaming revenue. The 2015 law also established a 25% tax on gross win for games excluding gaming machines, with annual per-machine fees of CFA 20,000-100,000 for gaming machines. There are no exchange controls restricting repatriation. Operators also fall under …

Full analysis · 59 words

Casino gaming is taxed at 15% of gross gaming revenue. The 2015 law also established a 25% tax on gross win for games excluding gaming machines, with annual per-machine fees of CFA 20,000-100,000 for gaming machines. There are no exchange controls restricting repatriation. Operators also fall under standard Cameroonian corporate income tax. Precise online-specific GGR treatment is partially verified.

06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Mixed

MTN Mobile Money (~50% penetration) and Orange Money are the dominant gambling funding channels, but since 30 January 2025 all online gambling payments must route exclusively through the InTouch aggregator. No exchange controls restrict cash transfer in or out of Cameroon. FATF grey-listing requires…

Full analysis · 78 words

MTN Mobile Money (~50% penetration) and Orange Money are the dominant gambling funding channels, but since 30 January 2025 all online gambling payments must route exclusively through the InTouch aggregator. No exchange controls restrict cash transfer in or out of Cameroon. FATF grey-listing requires operators and PSPs to apply enhanced due diligence to Cameroon-connected flows; ANIF is the national FIU receiving STRs and pre-launch activity statements, with COBAC as regional banking supervisor and GABAC the CEMAC AML body.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Mixed

No gambling-specific advertising statute was identified from primary sources; marketing operates within the general Law 2015/012 framework. The dominant marketing risk is ministerial volatility — the February 2025 deposit-ban incident shows individual ministers can impose sudden ad-hoc restrictions.…

Full analysis · 50 words

No gambling-specific advertising statute was identified from primary sources; marketing operates within the general Law 2015/012 framework. The dominant marketing risk is ministerial volatility — the February 2025 deposit-ban incident shows individual ministers can impose sudden ad-hoc restrictions. Bonus and sponsorship treatment is unverified and should be confirmed with ARJ.

08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Mixed

Ministerial authorisation for online games implies a technical review, and operators must maintain a .cm domain and local representation. No explicit server-location/hosting requirement is codified, though the .cm and local-presence requirements may imply locally accessible infrastructure. No specif…

Full analysis · 67 words

Ministerial authorisation for online games implies a technical review, and operators must maintain a .cm domain and local representation. No explicit server-location/hosting requirement is codified, though the .cm and local-presence requirements may imply locally accessible infrastructure. No specific RNG certification or geolocation mandate was confirmed. Data protection rests on sector rules under Law 2010/012 (cybersecurity) and Law 2010/013 (electronic communications); there are no dedicated gambling data-protection rules.

UncertainAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Mixed

Distribution access for gambling advertising in Cameroon changed materially this cycle through a private-platform mechanism rather than a state instrument. From 19 August 2025, Google's advertising policy permits Cameroon-targeted gambling advertising only for advertisers that are registered and lic…

Full analysis · 124 words

Distribution access for gambling advertising in Cameroon changed materially this cycle through a private-platform mechanism rather than a state instrument. From 19 August 2025, Google's advertising policy permits Cameroon-targeted gambling advertising only for advertisers that are registered and licensed by the Agence de Régulation des Jeux (ARJ). This functions as de facto platform-level gatekeeping tied to licence status: unlicensed operators lose access to a major digital-acquisition channel, while ARJ-licensed operators retain it. The change is confirmed in effect but carries no statutory durability rating, since it originates from Google's own policy rather than from Cameroonian legislation or decree, meaning it could be altered unilaterally by the platform. No other distribution-platform restrictions — app-store rules, ISP blocking, or affiliate-marketing constraints — were evidenced this cycle.

10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

The 15 March 2026 large-taxpayer filing deadline passed for foreign betting and casino platforms to comply with the new three percent digital tax established under the 2026 Finance Law. This is a fiscal-enforcement checkpoint rather than a gambling-licensing enforcement action, and it establishes th…

Full analysis · 141 words

The 15 March 2026 large-taxpayer filing deadline passed for foreign betting and casino platforms to comply with the new three percent digital tax established under the 2026 Finance Law. This is a fiscal-enforcement checkpoint rather than a gambling-licensing enforcement action, and it establishes the first observable compliance cadence under the significant-economic-presence tax regime introduced. The instrument behind this checkpoint is the Finance Law itself, administered through the Directorate General of Taxes rather than through the Ministry of Territorial Administration or the gaming regulator, so it runs on a separate track from the standing licensing gateway. No gambling-licensing enforcement action, revocation, or sanction was identified; the enforcement signal here is specifically about a dated fiscal-compliance deadline having passed for offshore digital gambling platforms, marking the point at which the new tax obligation moved from statutory text into an active, observable administrative cadence.

ConfirmedAI-generated5 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Mixed

The dominant regulatory development is the continuing FATF grey listing (since June 2023, reaffirmed February 2026) signalling systemic AML deficiencies that will constrain banking and PSP relationships until resolved. The 2015 Law gives Cameroon a structural advantage over many regional peers, but …

Full analysis · 77 words

The dominant regulatory development is the continuing FATF grey listing (since June 2023, reaffirmed February 2026) signalling systemic AML deficiencies that will constrain banking and PSP relationships until resolved. The 2015 Law gives Cameroon a structural advantage over many regional peers, but ministerial volatility (February 2025 deposit ban) and the new InTouch single-aggregator mandate add operational risk. No significant liberalising or restrictive legislative reform is in train; the trajectory is incremental AML compliance improvement under FATF pressure.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 25 red flags · 13 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

25 red flags (5 high, 10 medium, 10 low) and 0 controls that address them.

  • high
    FATF grey-listing since June 2023, retained Feb 2026
    Mandatory EDD on Cameroon-connected flows; banking and PSP de-risking risk.
    Sources
  • high
    Feb 2025 ministerial deposit ban (reversed)
    Demonstrates sudden ad-hoc ministerial intervention capacity.
    Sources
  • high
    Unlicensed online operation criminalised
    6mo-2yr imprisonment and CFA 5-25m fine for operating without authorisation.
    Sources
  • high
    Only ~8 of 24 FATF action points fulfilled
    Low execution rate signals prolonged grey-list status.
    Sources
  • high
    Correspondent-banking friction from grey listing
    International partners may impose enhanced controls on Cameroonian institutions.
    Sources
  • medium
    Mandatory InTouch aggregator routing
    Single point of failure and control over all online gambling payments.
    Sources
  • medium
    Unverified formal licensing of 1xBet/betPawa
    Commercial operators may run on informal tolerance, creating enforcement exposure.
    Sources
  • medium
    GGR / gross-win tax stacking
    15% GGR plus 25% gross-win tax for non-machine games raises effective burden.
    Sources
  • medium
    CFA 200m bank guarantee for online
    Material capital lock-up barrier for online entry.
    Sources
  • medium
    No codified player-protection regime located
    Home-regulator scrutiny on player protection for cross-border operators.
    Sources
  • medium
    No B2B supplier licence pathway
    Suppliers have no clear route to supply locally-licensed operators.
    Sources
  • medium
    Inconsistent enforcement credibility
    Weak rule-of-law signals unpredictability in dispute resolution.
    Sources
  • medium
    Home regulator scrutiny of Cameroon exposure
    UKGC/MGA licensees face source-of-funds scrutiny for Cameroon flows.
    Sources
  • medium
    Beneficial-ownership transparency gaps cited by FATF
    BO opacity raises AML diligence cost for counterparties.
    Sources
  • medium
    CEMAC AML obligations overlay
    Regional Regulation 01/03 imposes additional KYC/STR burden.
    Sources
  • low
    Regulator-identity ambiguity (MINATD vs Minister in charge of gaming)
    Source conflict on which ministry holds authority complicates engagement.
    Sources
  • low
    Unpublished fee schedule
    Entry budgeting uncertainty; fees set only in French decree.
    Sources
  • low
    No dedicated gambling data-protection rules
    Reliance on sectoral cyber/telecom laws creates compliance ambiguity.
    Sources
  • low
    No published RNG/geolocation standard
    Technical certification expectations are unclear pending ARJ specs.
    Sources
  • low
    Small low-income addressable market
    ~US$134m by 2029 limits scale despite growth.
    Sources
  • low
    Online dubious-legality framing in some sources
    Secondary commentary disputes practical online enforcement, complicating risk read.
    Sources
  • low
    Mobile-money concentration (MTN/Orange)
    Channel concentration creates dependency on a few PSPs.
    Sources
  • low
    Corporate tax stacking on commercial operators
    Standard CIT applies in addition to gambling-specific levies.
    Sources
  • low
    Non-transferable licences
    M&A and licence-trading routes are blocked.
    Sources
  • low
    No active liberalising reform
    Limited near-term clarity improvement on online licensing.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

EU-licensed sportsbook wants to serve Cameroonian players online.

Must obtain ministerial authorisation, incorporate locally, hold .cm domain, post CFA 200m guarantee, register with ANIF, and route payments via InTouch. Operating without authorisation is criminal.

Do this: Pursue conditional entry only with full local set-up and AML readiness.

Sources

B2B platform provider wants to supply a Cameroonian operator.

No B2B supplier licence class exists; the supplier cannot obtain a Cameroon B2B authorisation and must contract through the licensed operator.

Do this: Structure as a commercial supply to the authorised B2C operator; monitor for future B2B pathway.

Sources

Operator assesses FATF grey-list impact on banking.

Grey-listing triggers EDD and potential correspondent de-risking; only ~8/24 action points met means prolonged status.

Do this: Build enhanced AML controls and diversify banking relationships.

Sources

Operator faces sudden ministerial payment restriction.

The Feb 2025 deposit-ban precedent shows ministers can halt deposits ad hoc; reversal followed but disruption was real.

Do this: Maintain contingency liquidity and political-risk monitoring.

Sources

Operator models tax burden.

Casino GGR taxed at 15%; non-machine games face a 25% gross-win tax; standard CIT also applies.

Do this: Model effective burden including stacked levies before committing.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Fees. ARJ application/annual licence-fee schedule under Décret 2019/2300/PM not retrieved in primary French form.
  • searched: Cameroon ARJ licence fees decret 2019/2300
  • searched: Cameroon gambling licence cost francs CFA
  • searched: redevance jeux en ligne Cameroun ARJ
  • checked: igamingafrika.com
Competitive landscape. formal ARJ licensing status of 1xBet and betPawa unverified from primary sources.
  • searched: 1xBet Cameroon ARJ licence
  • searched: betPawa Cameroon authorisation gambling
  • searched: Cameroon licensed online operators list
  • checked: igamingafrika.com
Player protection. statutory self-exclusion, deposit-limit and reality-check provisions not located.
  • searched: Cameroon gambling responsible gaming rules
  • searched: Cameroun jeu responsable auto-exclusion
  • searched: Cameroon deposit limit gambling law
  • checked: legalpilot.com

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

Online games require ministerial authorisation; ARJ is the operator agency.

CM-CP-001 · T3 of 4 (asserted T1, shown at its source's tier) · published 16 Aug 2023 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources

Cameroon remains on the FATF grey list as at February 2026.

CM-CP-002 · T1 of 4 · published 13 Feb 2026 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources