title: Connecticut — Technical compliance: What must the platform meet? | advennt.io canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/connecticut/technical/ [Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [Connecticut](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/connecticut/) Technical compliance Connecticut · Question 08 of 11 # Technical compliance: What must the platform meet? Favourable · Probable · AI-generated · [Back to full Connecticut report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/connecticut/) Key section parameters | Jurisdiction | Connecticut (US-CT) | |---|---| | Regulator | Recorded in register | | Favourability | Favourable | | Confidence | Probable | | Review status | AI-generated | | Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 | Summary answer Public Act 26-53 introduces a new statutory bar on the use of artificial intelligence to target certain bets to online sports-wagering customers. This is a fresh technical-compliance obligation for Connecticut's licensed sports-wagering operators, requiring review of any personalization, recommendat… ## Full section analysis Public Act 26-53 introduces a new statutory bar on the use of artificial intelligence to target certain bets to online sports-wagering customers. This is a fresh technical-compliance obligation for Connecticut's licensed sports-wagering operators, requiring review of any personalization, recommendation or targeting systems that select bets for individual customers using AI-driven methods. The restriction sits alongside the existing tethered licence structure rather than altering it, but it introduces a new compliance surface that licensees must address in their product and technology stacks going forward.