Jurisdictions › Côte d'Ivoire

Côte d'Ivoire

National jurisdiction

Côte d'Ivoire's gambling market is structured around a dual regime rather than an open licensing system.

3 open · 3 restricted · 7 closed · 5 uncertain · 2 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 25 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • Casino
    Restricted
  • Poker
    Restricted
  • BingoNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • LotteryState monopoly
    Closed
  • Sports bettingState monopoly
    Closed
  • Other event bettingGrey zone · Contested
    Uncertain
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports bettingGrey zone · Contested
    Uncertain
  • Exchange bettingGrey zone · Contested
    Uncertain
  • Pool bettingState monopoly · Models agree
    Closed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sportsState monopoly
    Closed
  • Skill gamesProhibited · Contested
    Closed
  • Prediction marketsProhibited · Contested
    Closed
  • SweepstakesProhibited
    Closed
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Contested
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BOutside the regulatory perimeter · Contested
    Open
  • Affiliate marketingOutside the regulatory perimeter · Contested
    Open
  • Payments for gambling
    Restricted

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingNot yet regulated
    Uncertain

Class-level certainty is graded for 9 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Côte d'Ivoire: state-concession model constrains open online market entry; land-based casino confined to premium hotel channel

What has changed

  • Loi n°2020-480 (2020) replaced ~50-year-old instruments and created ARJH as an independent regulator with administrative-only sanction powers; corporate tax on gambling operators was raised to 30% in 2025.

What to do now

  • Evaluate commercial partnership structures with LONACI (per the Sportcash/Sports4Africa precedent) as the only demonstrated route to lawful online sports betting distribution; do not assume a standalone B2C/B2B online licence exists.

What to watch

  • ARJH secondary regulation on technical standards, any B2B licensing pathway development, and enforcement trend against the ~500 unauthorised foreign betting sites referenced in the legislative record.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Mixed

Cote d'Ivoire operates a dual-regime gambling regulatory structure under Law No. 2020-480 of 27 May 2020. LONACI holds an exclusive state concession over sports betting, online gambling and lotteries, meaning private operators cannot enter these verticals directly. ARJH separately authorises land-ba…

Full analysis · 127 words

Cote d'Ivoire operates a dual-regime gambling regulatory structure under Law No. 2020-480 of 27 May 2020. LONACI holds an exclusive state concession over sports betting, online gambling and lotteries, meaning private operators cannot enter these verticals directly. ARJH separately authorises land-based casinos and slot-machine venues, the only segment genuinely open to private licensees. This cycle shows active enforcement tightening, with ARJH publicly seizing and destroying illegal slot machines, alongside a new 2026 Finance Law measure taxing foreign digital gambling platforms at an effective rate of approximately three percent of turnover. The structural licensing regime itself remains unchanged, but the enforcement and fiscal posture around it has moved materially, consistent with a state strategy to reinforce the LONACI monopoly and capture fiscal value from the offshore-serving grey market.

  • LONACI statutory concession/monopoly over most online games
  • No general B2C/B2B online licensing pathway independent of the LONACI concession identified
  • Casino/slot licensing confined to 4-star hotel premises
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Mixed

Three licence classes are now confirmed under Côte d'Ivoire's gambling framework, all deriving from the 6 and 7 December 2023 Council of Ministers decrees implementing Law 2020-480. The LONACI concession covers jeux concédés — lotteries, sports betting, horse-race betting, and virtual betting — and …

Full analysis · 164 words

Three licence classes are now confirmed under Côte d'Ivoire's gambling framework, all deriving from the 6 and 7 December 2023 Council of Ministers decrees implementing Law 2020-480. The LONACI concession covers jeux concédés — lotteries, sports betting, horse-race betting, and virtual betting — and is held exclusively by LONACI, which is 85% state-owned. The ARJH authorisation regime covers promotional and charitable lotteries, and a separate ARJH licensing track covers casino gaming and slot machines. These decrees carry the durability of an implementing instrument under primary legislation, giving the licensing structure a reasonably durable statutory basis. Within this structure, authorisation-issuance, renewal, and withdrawal power for the ARJH track was transferred from joint ministerial control to ARJH's sole competence by the December 2023 decree, a change LONACI's leadership has publicly framed as strengthening the regime's capacity to act against illegal operators. This consolidation is itself set by decree rather than by the enabling Act, giving it a comparatively fragile durability relative to the underlying statutory framework.

08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Mixed

The defining technical-compliance development this cycle is the government's approval of a national digital platform for real-time monitoring of gambling transactions, introduced in October 2025. This fragile administrative instrument, rather than a durable statutory rule, creates a new integration …

Full analysis · 120 words

The defining technical-compliance development this cycle is the government's approval of a national digital platform for real-time monitoring of gambling transactions, introduced in October 2025. This fragile administrative instrument, rather than a durable statutory rule, creates a new integration obligation for operators, whose payment-processing systems must connect to the state platform to support real-time oversight of gambling-linked transaction flows. The mechanism carries accessory-liability implications under what is described as a National Gambling Monitoring Directive, tying mandatory technical integration directly to compliance standing. No published technical specification or certification standard was identified this cycle beyond the existence of the monitoring-platform obligation itself, and the practical compliance burden of integration, including timeline and format requirements, remains to be clarified in subsequent guidance.

UncertainAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Mixed

The December 2023 implementing decrees under Law 2020-480 expressly prohibit operating an online betting site that has not been approved by LONACI or ARJH. This is a direct statutory prohibition rather than an implicit gap in the framework, and it applies to the online-distribution channel specifica…

Full analysis · 137 words

The December 2023 implementing decrees under Law 2020-480 expressly prohibit operating an online betting site that has not been approved by LONACI or ARJH. This is a direct statutory prohibition rather than an implicit gap in the framework, and it applies to the online-distribution channel specifically: an operator cannot legally run an online betting product in Côte d'Ivoire without first obtaining approval through one of the two established routes. Because the prohibition sits within the same decrees that establish the licensing structure itself, it carries the same durable statutory basis as the underlying licensing regime. For an operator, the practical effect is that there is no informal, unregulated, or offshore-adjacent online channel available even in principle; online distribution is locked to state-approved platforms only, a materially tighter position than existed before the decrees formalised the licensing structure.

UncertainAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

Enforcement in Cote d'Ivoire rests on the licensing-offence structure of Law No. 2020-480, under which operation outside the LONACI concession or an ARJH authorisation is itself unlawful, backed since April 2026 by a dedicated Council of Ministers-created surveillance unit. That decree gives sworn a…

Full analysis · 185 words

Enforcement in Cote d'Ivoire rests on the licensing-offence structure of Law No. 2020-480, under which operation outside the LONACI concession or an ARJH authorisation is itself unlawful, backed since April 2026 by a dedicated Council of Ministers-created surveillance unit. That decree gives sworn agents power to conduct unannounced audits and seize non-compliant equipment, acting jointly with the Economic and Financial Criminal Unit and the Criminal Asset Recovery Agency; the reporting behind it is T2-sourced press coverage of a Conseil des Ministres decree, not an independently retrieved primary decree text, so treat its precise scope as probable. This follows a demonstrated pattern: ARJH destroyed more than 110 unlicensed slot machines and their components in the Abidjan/Bingerville area in October 2025, evidencing physical seizure and destruction rather than administrative fines alone as the state's preferred remedy against grey-market equipment. The licence-revocation risk drivers for a licensed operator are the underlying statute's exclusivity terms and any equipment or activity found outside the concession or authorisation boundary; for an unlicensed operator, the risk is direct seizure and destruction under the demonstrated enforcement pattern, now reinforced by dedicated investigative capacity.

ProbableAI-generated4 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 2 red flags · 12 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

2 red flags (1 high, 1 medium) and 0 controls that address them.

  • high
    No confirmed general B2B or multi-operator B2C online licensing pathway independent of LONACI concession
    Foreign operators without a LONACI partnership may have no lawful route to license online products.
    Sources
  • medium
    Government's own legislative record cites ~500 unauthorised foreign betting sites and a large illicit lottery network operating at scale
    Signals substantial unlicensed market competition and potential blocking/enforcement risk for non-partnered foreign brands.
    Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Market opportunity. no credible T1/T2 GGR or total market-size figure located; only illicit-turnover figures from 2020 legislative debate available
  • searched: Côte d'Ivoire gambling market size GGR estimate
  • searched: LONACI annual revenue report
  • searched: ARJH marché des jeux rapport annuel
  • checked: lonaci.ci
Competitive landscape. no named source for licensed operator count or unlicensed market share percentage
  • searched: ARJH liste opérateurs agréés Côte d'Ivoire
  • searched: nombre opérateurs jeux de hasard licenciés Côte d'Ivoire
  • searched: part de marché jeux illégaux Côte d'Ivoire
  • checked: centif.ci
Entry pathways.b2b licensing. unable to determine definitively whether a standalone B2B software/platform licence pathway exists outside the LONACI concession/partnership model
  • searched: ARJH licence B2B fournisseur logiciel jeux
  • searched: Côte d'Ivoire B2B gaming software licence
  • searched: LONACI partenariat fournisseur technique agrément
  • checked: assnat.ci
Player protection. no named source located for a formal self-exclusion scheme or deposit-limit regime under Loi n°2020-480 or ARJH secondary regulation
  • searched: ARJH auto-exclusion joueurs jeu responsable
  • searched: Côte d'Ivoire limite de dépôt jeux de hasard
  • searched: LONACI jeu responsable dispositif
  • checked: lonaci.ci
Regulated activity classes. esports_betting and crypto_gambling status not addressed in any T1/T2 source located
  • searched: Côte d'Ivoire crypto gambling regulation
  • searched: Côte d'Ivoire esports betting law ARJH
  • searched: paris esports Côte d'Ivoire réglementation
  • checked: assnat.ci

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.