Jurisdictions › United States › Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C.

Sub-national unit

Entry is via direct OLG application (extensive qualifier due diligence, financial statements, litigation history) or accelerated temporary/provisional licensing for operators already licensed in an 'Office-approved gaming jurisdiction.' No explicit local-director mandate was located.

6 open · 1 restricted · 2 closed · 7 uncertain · 4 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 11 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • PokerNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • BingoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Lottery
    Open
  • Sports betting
    Open
  • Other event bettingGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports bettingModels agree
    Restricted
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sportsGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Skill gamesGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Prediction marketsGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • SweepstakesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Models agree
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BModels agree
    Open
  • Affiliate marketingModels agree
    Open
    Varies by form · 1
    • Flat fee or cpa affiliate: grey_zone
  • Payments for gamblingModels agree
    Open

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Class-level certainty is graded for 9 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

DC sports wagering market is mature and multi-operator, but iGaming remains closed pending B26-0656

What has changed

  • The DC online sports betting market expanded from a single government app (GambetDC/FanDuel) to six competing licensed operators through 2024-2026, while retail Games of Skill licensing shifted from OLG to ABCA effective October 2025.

What to do now

  • Operators should pursue Class A/B/C sports wagering licensure or reciprocity-based temporary licensing now, while monitoring B26-0656 for a prospective iGaming entry point and reassessing sweepstakes-adjacent product exposure ahead of a proposed ban.

What to watch

  • Outcome of the DC Council's consideration of B26-0656 (iGaming legalization/sweepstakes ban), resolution of the 'Statute of Anne' litigation, and any further vendor-integrity enforcement following the Intralot/VSC settlement.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Mixed

D.C.'s gambling regime centres on two regulated activity classes: multi-operator sports wagering, opened up by the 2024 reform, and Game of Skill retail machines, whose retail licensing has now split between the Office of Lottery and Gaming (OLG) and the Alcohol Beverage and Cannabis Administration …

Full analysis · 120 words

D.C.'s gambling regime centres on two regulated activity classes: multi-operator sports wagering, opened up by the 2024 reform, and Game of Skill retail machines, whose retail licensing has now split between the Office of Lottery and Gaming (OLG) and the Alcohol Beverage and Cannabis Administration (ABCA) under D.C. Act 26-146, effective 1 October 2025. OLG retains sports-wagering licensing and Game of Skill manufacturer/distributor licensing, while ABCA takes on retail Game of Skill oversight. The market continues to expand commercially, evidenced by a new operator entrant this period and continued year-on-year growth in wagering volume, positioning D.C. within the broader US-state family pattern of a general licensing regime applied to a growing sports-wagering vertical alongside a separately regulated skill-machine retail sector.

  • Small absolute market size relative to full US states
  • Ongoing 'Statute of Anne' litigation challenging the sports-wagering statute's validity
  • Unique DC congressional-review overlay on all local legislation creating timing uncertainty
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Favourable

D.C. Act 26-146, the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Support Emergency Act, transfers retail licensing authority for Game of Skill machines from the Office of Lottery and Gaming (OLG) to the Alcohol Beverage and Cannabis Administration (ABCA), effective 1 October 2025. DC Code § 36-601.12 cites Act 26-146, …

Full analysis · 135 words

D.C. Act 26-146, the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Support Emergency Act, transfers retail licensing authority for Game of Skill machines from the Office of Lottery and Gaming (OLG) to the Alcohol Beverage and Cannabis Administration (ABCA), effective 1 October 2025. DC Code § 36-601.12 cites Act 26-146, dated 3 September 2025 and published at 72 DCR 9623, as the enacting instrument. OLG retains full licensing authority over sports wagering and continues to license Game of Skill manufacturers and distributors, so the regulatory architecture is now split by product and by function within the same vertical. Existing and prospective Game of Skill retail licence-holders must now transact their licensing relationship with ABCA rather than OLG, a change that is administrative and institutional rather than a change to the underlying legality or licensability of the activity itself.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Mixed

Entry is via direct OLG application (extensive qualifier due diligence, financial statements, litigation history) or accelerated temporary/provisional licensing for operators already licensed in an 'Office-approved gaming jurisdiction.' No explicit local-director mandate was located.

04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Mixed

Specific application and annual licence fee dollar amounts for Class A/B/C sports wagering operators were not located in available sources; fee bands are estimated pending further OLG fee-schedule verification.

UncertainAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Sports wagering GGR is taxed at differentiated rates by licence class: Class A 20%, Class B 10%, Class C 30%, collected monthly on operators' gross gaming revenue. Lottery proceeds are transferred to the General Fund rather than taxed separately.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Favourable

Six licensed sportsbook brands operate online/mobile in DC with retail kiosk cash-funding options (e.g., Caesars kiosks). No DC-specific banking-access disruption was identified in available sources; federal BSA/UIGEA banking backdrop applies as in all US jurisdictions.

07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Mixed

DC applies social-responsibility advertising standards across all regulated verticals and has issued public warnings against endorsing unlicensed offshore sportsbooks. Specific bonus/promotional restriction detail beyond general responsible-gambling messaging was not located.

08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Favourable

OLG mandates GPS-based geofencing for all mobile/online wagering to confirm in-District location, alongside KYC identity/age verification at account registration. OLG establishes internal control standards for wagering equipment and systems.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Favourable

All major licensed sportsbook apps (FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, DraftKings, Fanatics, theScore Bet) are available on iOS and Android in the District. Advertising must be socially responsible; specific platform-level (Google/Meta) ad-policy detail for DC specifically was not located.

10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

The DC Office of the Attorney General secured a $6.5 million settlement -- $5 million from Intralot and $1.5 million from Veterans Services Corporation -- resolving False Claims Act allegations of misrepresented certified-business-enterprise subcontracting performance on the District's sole-source s…

Full analysis · 128 words

The DC Office of the Attorney General secured a $6.5 million settlement -- $5 million from Intralot and $1.5 million from Veterans Services Corporation -- resolving False Claims Act allegations of misrepresented certified-business-enterprise subcontracting performance on the District's sole-source sports-wagering and lottery contract. This is confirmed and is the first DC False Claims Act action targeting a certified-business-enterprise matter in the gaming sector, marking a structural rather than episodic development: it signals the Attorney General's willingness to apply general procurement-integrity statutes against gaming-sector contractors. Combined with the ABCA licensing-authority transfer, DC's enforcement architecture now runs on two tracks -- gaming-specific licensing enforcement through OLG/ABCA, and general government-contracting integrity enforcement through the Attorney General -- and vendors on future sports-wagering or iGaming contracts should expect subcontracting-compliance scrutiny to intensify.

ConfirmedAI-generated8 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Mixed

The most significant near-term development is B26-0656, the Internet Gaming and Consumer Protection Act of 2026, which would legalize online casino/poker and ban dual-currency sweepstakes platforms. A public hearing was held May 4, 2026. Litigation ('Statute of Anne' suit) introduces some legal unce…

Full analysis · 48 words

The most significant near-term development is B26-0656, the Internet Gaming and Consumer Protection Act of 2026, which would legalize online casino/poker and ban dual-currency sweepstakes platforms. A public hearing was held May 4, 2026. Litigation ('Statute of Anne' suit) introduces some legal uncertainty around the existing sports-wagering framework.

Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 5 red flags · 13 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

5 red flags (2 high, 3 medium) and 0 controls that address them.

  • high
    Fraud settlement involving core platform vendor (GambetDC contract)
    Signals systemic vendor-oversight weaknesses in state/district-operated gaming infrastructure procurement.
    Sources
  • high
    Estimated $700M wagered on unlicensed platforms by DC residents in 2024
    Indicates a substantial revenue leakage and consumer-protection gap outside OLG oversight.
    Sources
  • medium
    'Statute of Anne' suit challenging SWLAA legality
    An adverse ruling could disrupt the legal basis for the entire sports-wagering licensing regime.
    Sources
  • medium
    Unregulated dual-currency sweepstakes casinos operating pending a proposed ban
    Creates consumer-protection and competitive-parity risk for licensed operators pending B26-0656.
    Sources
  • medium
    DC laws are subject to a congressional review period before taking effect
    Creates a unique enactment-timing risk not present in full-state jurisdictions.
    Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Aml cft regime. no DC-specific FATF/MER citation, reporting threshold, or designated-reporting-entity determination located beyond the general federal UIGEA overlay.
  • searched: DC gambling AML BSA reporting requirements OLG
  • searched: DC Office of Lottery and Gaming suspicious activity reporting threshold
  • searched: FinCEN gaming advisory Washington DC sports wagering
  • checked: dclottery.com
Baseline.fees / cost to operate. specific application and annual licence fee dollar amounts for Class A/B/C operators not located.
  • searched: DC OLG sports wagering operator licence application fee amount
  • searched: DC Class A Class B Class C sports wagering licence fee schedule
  • searched: OLG licensing fee schedule Washington DC
  • checked: dclottery.com
Cost to operate.compliance lift.deduction rules summary. bonus/free-bet deductibility treatment against GGR tax base not sourced.
  • searched: DC sports wagering GGR tax free bet deduction
  • searched: DC Code 36-621.15 promotional credit deduction
  • searched: DC OLG bonus deduction gross gaming revenue
  • checked: code.dccouncil.gov
Market opportunity. no independently published total-market GGR or handle estimate beyond monthly figures; annual market size estimate not available.
  • searched: Washington DC sports betting annual handle 2025 total
  • searched: DC OLG annual report sports wagering revenue
  • searched: DC sports betting market size report
  • checked: rg.org
Statutory definitions.gambling test.elements. core statutory definition text of 'wager'/'gambling' under DC law not located in available sources.
  • searched: DC Code definition of gambling wager statute
  • searched: D.C. Code 22 illegal gambling definition
  • searched: DC Code Title 22 gaming definitions
  • checked: code.dccouncil.gov
Competitive landscape.unlicensed market share estimate pct. only an absolute unlicensed handle estimate ($700M, 2024) was found; no percentage-of-market figure located.
  • searched: DC unlicensed gambling market share percentage
  • searched: DC offshore sportsbook percentage of handle
  • searched: Washington DC sweepstakes casino market share estimate
  • checked: gamingamerica.com
Payments and money flow.withdrawal obligations. statutory or regulatory withdrawal-timeframe requirement not sourced.
  • searched: DC OLG sports wagering withdrawal timeframe requirement
  • searched: DC sports betting payout rules regulation
  • searched: OLG regulation withdrawal processing time
  • checked: dclottery.com

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.