title: Greece — Technical compliance: What must the platform meet? | advennt.io canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/greece/technical/ [Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [Greece](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/greece/) Technical compliance Greece · Question 08 of 11 # Technical compliance: What must the platform meet? Mixed · Probable · Not reviewed · [Back to full Greece report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/greece/) Key section parameters | Jurisdiction | Greece (GR) | |---|---| | Regulator | HGC | | Favourability | Mixed | | Confidence | Probable | | Review status | | | Not reviewed Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 | Summary answer The EEEP-EETT DNS Response Policy Zone (RPZ) integration represents a new technical enforcement layer for domain-level blocking of unlicensed gambling sites, moving beyond the prior public blacklist model to active DNS infrastructure blocking. This confirmed development is sourced at Tier-2 and carr… ## Full section analysis The EEEP-EETT DNS Response Policy Zone (RPZ) integration represents a new technical enforcement layer for domain-level blocking of unlicensed gambling sites, moving beyond the prior public blacklist model to active DNS infrastructure blocking. This confirmed development is sourced at Tier-2 and carries fragile durability, as it rests on an inter-agency technical arrangement between EEEP and EETT rather than a codified statutory mandate. The mechanism integrates blocked domains directly into a dedicated Response Policy Zone within DNS infrastructure, giving the regulator a materially faster and more durable blocking capability than the previous blacklist-publication model. No other technical-compliance evidence, such as RNG certification or server-location rules, surfaced this cycle.