Indiana

Sub-national unit

Enter for sports wagering via casino tether — low 9.5% tax, stable market; skip iGaming.

4 open · 2 restricted · 8 closed · 2 uncertain · 4 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 4 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • PokerProhibited
    Closed
  • BingoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • LotteryState monopoly
    Closed
  • Sports betting
    Open
  • Other event bettingModels agree
    Restricted
    Varies by form · 1
    • Political and elections: prohibited
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Exchange bettingGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Fantasy sports
    Open
  • Skill gamesProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Pure skill: outside_perimeter
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • SweepstakesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Free play
    Not yet assessed

Supply roles

  • Software / B2B
    Restricted
  • Affiliate marketing
    Open
  • Payments for gambling
    Open

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Class-level certainty is graded for 7 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Indiana is a low-tax, stable, tethered sports-wagering market — attractive for sportsbook operators and B2B suppliers, closed to iGaming.

What has changed

  • Operator count settled at 11 (Unibet/Betway exited 2024; Fanatics absorbed PointsBet). iGaming failed again in 2025–26. A sweepstakes ban (HB 1052) takes effect 1 July 2026. iLottery legislation advanced in committee.

What to do now

  • Sports operators should secure a casino/racino tether and IGC vendor licence to exploit the 9.5% GGR tax. B2B suppliers should target the 11 active operators via service-provider licensing. Do not plan around iGaming.

What to watch

  • iLottery enactment, any renewed iGaming push in a future session, HB 1052 sweepstakes enforcement, and the Pokagon Band compact status.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Favourable

Indiana enacted two restrictive gambling-adjacent instruments this period: a prohibition on online sweepstakes games built on dual- or multi-currency systems where virtual currency can be exchanged for cash or prizes (House Bill 1052, enacted as Public Law 153, signed 12 March 2026, effective 1 July…

Full analysis · 132 words

Indiana enacted two restrictive gambling-adjacent instruments this period: a prohibition on online sweepstakes games built on dual- or multi-currency systems where virtual currency can be exchanged for cash or prizes (House Bill 1052, enacted as Public Law 153, signed 12 March 2026, effective 1 July 2026), and a collegiate athlete proposition-bet restriction (Senate Bill 120, effective 1 July 2026). Separately, the Indiana Gaming Commission unanimously denied a broader NCAA petition to prohibit all college player proposition bets statewide, deferring that policy question to the legislature rather than resolving it through administrative rulemaking. The commission also granted ten procedural rule waivers to Indiana casinos since June 2025, covering promotions review, staffing, and badge-wear requirements, indicating a lighter-touch administrative posture on non-integrity matters even as the legislature tightens rules on unlicensed adjacent product categories.

  • sports-only market — iGaming blocked
  • tether to Indiana casino/racino required
  • regional competition from Ohio, Michigan, Illinois
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Favourable

House Bill 1052 was enacted as Public Law 153, signed 12 March 2026 and effective 1 July 2026, prohibiting online sweepstakes games built on dual- or multi-currency systems where virtual currency can be exchanged for cash or prizes. The statute gives the Indiana Gaming Commission civil penalty autho…

Full analysis · 111 words

House Bill 1052 was enacted as Public Law 153, signed 12 March 2026 and effective 1 July 2026, prohibiting online sweepstakes games built on dual- or multi-currency systems where virtual currency can be exchanged for cash or prizes. The statute gives the Indiana Gaming Commission civil penalty authority against operators who knowingly serve Indiana residents with prohibited sweepstakes products. This closes a product category that had previously operated in unaddressed legal space in Indiana, without altering the state's existing licensed activity classes for sports betting and casino gaming. The instrument is a statute rather than an administrative rule, placing enforcement authority squarely with the commission under a now-in-force civil penalty mechanism.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Favourable

Commercially attractive and structurally accessible for tethered sports-wagering operators. The 9.5% GGR tax is among the lowest in the US, creating strong operator margin; 11 active operators demonstrate a vibrant market. The tether requirement is manageable given multiple casino/racino partners. A…

Full analysis · 59 words

Commercially attractive and structurally accessible for tethered sports-wagering operators. The 9.5% GGR tax is among the lowest in the US, creating strong operator margin; 11 active operators demonstrate a vibrant market. The tether requirement is manageable given multiple casino/racino partners. A good-priority market for sports operators seeking low-tax jurisdictions, and a target base of 11 operators for B2B suppliers.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Favourable

Operator (vendor) licences carry a $100,000 initial fee and a $50,000 annual renewal under IGC rules; tether casinos/racinos hold master certificates. Fees are modest relative to other US states.

05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Indiana levies a flat 9.5% tax on adjusted gross sports-wagering revenue (GGR), applied to both retail and online — one of the lowest rates in the US. A 0.25% federal excise on handle also applies.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Favourable

Standard US online sports-wagering payment stack: licensed Indiana operators accept ACH, debit/credit cards, e-wallets and prepaid. MCC 7995 is functional for IGC-licensed operators. BSA/FinCEN AML obligations apply with SAR/CTR filing; the IGC requires an AML compliance programme.

07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Favourable

The IGC regulates marketing through licence conditions and responsible-gaming requirements; there is no state-specific blanket advertising ban beyond standard 21+ targeting and RG messaging. Operators run aggressive promotional and bonus activity. Sports-team sponsorships (Colts, Pacers) are broadly…

Full analysis · 52 words

The IGC regulates marketing through licence conditions and responsible-gaming requirements; there is no state-specific blanket advertising ban beyond standard 21+ targeting and RG messaging. Operators run aggressive promotional and bonus activity. Sports-team sponsorships (Colts, Pacers) are broadly permitted. Affiliate marketing requires no separate licence but sits under IGC oversight of promotional activity.

08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Favourable

Geolocation is mandatory — bettors must be physically within Indiana, verified via geofencing technology. No specific server-residency requirement was identified in available sources; recorded as none pending IGC technical-standards confirmation. Systems must be certified by an independent testing l…

Full analysis · 39 words

Geolocation is mandatory — bettors must be physically within Indiana, verified via geofencing technology. No specific server-residency requirement was identified in available sources; recorded as none pending IGC technical-standards confirmation. Systems must be certified by an independent testing lab.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Favourable

Online and mobile-app distribution channels for dual-currency sweepstakes-game products are prohibited statewide effective July 1, 2026 under House Bill 1052. This is a new statutory foreclosure of a distribution channel that had previously been operating in Indiana without a defined statutory prohi…

Full analysis · 62 words

Online and mobile-app distribution channels for dual-currency sweepstakes-game products are prohibited statewide effective July 1, 2026 under House Bill 1052. This is a new statutory foreclosure of a distribution channel that had previously been operating in Indiana without a defined statutory prohibition. No other distribution-platform developments, such as app-store, ISP, or payment-provider platform restrictions, were identified in this cycle's research for Indiana.

10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Favourable

The Indiana Gaming Commission unanimously denied an NCAA petition, heard around September 2026, to prohibit college player proposition bets statewide, instead deferring the broader policy question to the legislature rather than resolving it through administrative rulemaking. This leaves the narrower…

Full analysis · 148 words

The Indiana Gaming Commission unanimously denied an NCAA petition, heard around September 2026, to prohibit college player proposition bets statewide, instead deferring the broader policy question to the legislature rather than resolving it through administrative rulemaking. This leaves the narrower Senate Bill 120 restriction, which prohibits sports betting certificate holders and vendors from accepting proposition bets from a collegiate athlete on the sport that athlete plays, as the operative rule; SB120 carries a civil penalty of up to 10,000 dollars against the athlete and took effect 1 July 2026. Separately, Public Law 153, signed 12 March 2026 and effective 1 July 2026, gives the commission civil penalty authority against operators who knowingly serve Indiana residents with prohibited dual- or multi-currency sweepstakes products. Together these developments show a commission willing to enforce narrowly-drawn statutory prohibitions but unwilling to expand its own rulemaking reach beyond what the legislature has enacted.

ConfirmedAI-generated5 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Favourable

Indiana is a commercially stable, operator-friendly sports-wagering market anchored by its low 9.5% tax. iGaming has been blocked across consecutive sessions and remains unlikely near-term. iLottery legislation advanced in committee in 2026 but is not enacted. A sweepstakes ban (HB 1052) is set to t…

Full analysis · 58 words

Indiana is a commercially stable, operator-friendly sports-wagering market anchored by its low 9.5% tax. iGaming has been blocked across consecutive sessions and remains unlikely near-term. iLottery legislation advanced in committee in 2026 but is not enacted. A sweepstakes ban (HB 1052) is set to take effect 1 July 2026. The 12→11 operator drift reflects normal consolidation, not distress.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 1 enforcement · 26 red flags · 15 sources · Expand full record

Enforcement record

What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 1 recorded event.

  1. 1 Jan 2024
    Indiana Gaming Commission · Betfair Interactive US (FanDuel)
    Confirmed
    Sources

What gets operators fined

26 red flags (12 high, 10 medium, 1 low) and 6 controls that address them.

  • high
    No casino/racino tether secured
    Online operators cannot launch without a tether partner.
    Sources
  • high
    Operating online poker
    Online poker is not authorised.
    Sources
  • high
    Operating dual/multi-currency sweepstakes casino post 1 July 2026
    HB 1052 classifies the vertical as illegal gambling from that date.
    Sources
  • high
    Targeting under-21 audiences
    Minimum age is 21; targeting minors breaches RG rules.
    Sources
  • high
    Failure to file SAR/CTR
    BSA/FinCEN obligations apply; non-filing is a federal violation.
    Sources
  • high
    Uncertified wagering system
    Systems must pass independent testing-lab certification.
    Sources
  • high
    B2B supply without service-provider licence
    Suppliers require IGC approval.
    Sources
  • high
    Crypto-gambling offering
    No IGC-approved crypto pathway exists.
    Sources
  • high
    Selling lottery products outside Hoosier Lottery monopoly
    Lottery is monopolised; iLottery not yet enacted.
    Sources
  • high
    Accepting bets from self-excluded players
    IGC exclusion list is binding.
    Sources
  • high
    Underreporting adjusted gross revenue
    9.5% GGR tax obligations; misreporting risks penalties.
    Sources
  • high
    Marketing offshore unlicensed sportsbooks to Indiana residents
    Offshore sites fall outside IGC oversight and consumer protection.
    Sources
  • medium
    Offering esports/high-school/youth markets without IGC approval
    IGC bans these markets absent specific approval.
    Sources
  • medium
    Breach of IGC settlement-order conditions
    Risks escalation to suspension/revocation.
    Sources
  • medium
    Misleading bonus/promotional terms
    IGC oversight of promotions; FTC exposure.
    Sources
  • medium
    Failure to report suspicious wagering to integrity tip line
    IGC requires integrity reporting.
    Sources
  • medium
    Felony-disqualified key persons without waiver
    IGC felony-disqualification rules apply to occupational licences.
    Sources
  • medium
    Prediction-market products marketed as betting
    Contested legality; state regulators may treat as illegal gambling.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming state licence covers tribal-land operations
    Pokagon reservation operates under compact/IGRA, not state licence.
    Sources
  • medium
    Using non-compliant MCC for gambling transactions
    MCC 7995 required for licensed-operator transactions.
    Sources
  • medium
    Planning iGaming launch assuming imminent legalisation
    iGaming repeatedly blocked; no near-term pathway.
    Sources
  • medium
    Offering pick'em DFS without compliant licensing
    Pick'em/prediction DFS formats face evolving IGC scrutiny.
    Sources
  • low
    Underestimating regional cross-border competition
    Ohio, Michigan, Illinois compete for Indiana-corridor bettors.
    Sources
  • critical
    Operating online sports wagering without an IGC vendor licence
    Unlicensed operation is illegal gambling subject to enforcement.
    Sources
  • critical
    Offering online casino (iGaming)
    iGaming is not legal in Indiana; prohibited.
    Sources
  • critical
    Accepting wagers from outside Indiana
    Geolocation is mandatory; out-of-state bets are unlawful.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    Tether agreement verification
    Confirm a binding affiliation with a licensed Indiana casino/racino before applying.
    Sources
  • 002
    IGC vendor licence maintenance
    Hold and renew the IGC vendor licence ($100k / $50k).
    Sources
  • 003
    Geolocation enforcement
    Deploy compliant geofencing to confirm in-state wagering.
    Sources
  • 004
    BSA/AML programme
    Maintain SAR/CTR filing and AML compliance programme.
    Sources
  • 005
    System certification
    Submit wagering system to independent testing-lab certification.
    Sources
  • 006
    Self-exclusion screening
    Screen against IGC exclusion list at registration and wager.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

National sportsbook seeks Indiana market access.

Operator must secure a tether with a licensed casino/racino (3 skins available) and obtain an IGC vendor licence; geolocation and AML programmes required.

Do this: Negotiate tether; file IGC licence application; budget $100k initial + $50k renewal.

Sources

B2B platform provider entering Indiana.

Provider must hold an IGC service-provider/supplier licence to supply the 11 active operators.

Do this: Apply for supplier licence; target existing operators.

Sources

Operator considering iGaming launch.

iGaming is not legal; bills failed 2025–26. No pathway exists.

Do this: Do not launch iGaming; monitor reform horizon.

Sources

Sweepstakes casino operating in Indiana.

Currently grey-zone (IGC says not illegal today), but HB 1052 classifies the vertical as illegal gambling from 1 July 2026.

Do this: Exit or restructure before 1 July 2026.

Sources

DFS operator with pick'em format.

DFS is separately IGC-licensed under § 4-33-24; pick'em/prediction formats face evolving scrutiny.

Do this: Hold DFS operator licence; monitor IGC position on pick'em.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Fees. full current IGC fee schedule beyond $100k initial / $50k renewal not fully T1-sourced.
Competitive landscape. no published unlicensed/offshore market-share figure available.
Technical compliance. server-residency / hosting standards not confirmed against IGC technical specs.

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.