Jurisdictions › Japan

Japan

National jurisdiction

Online gambling: entry is not possible; criminal prohibition applies to operators and their Japan-based personnel, and the September 2025 amendment reaches offshore operators presenting sites to JP residents.

3 open · 1 restricted · 13 closed · 3 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 28 Sep 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • PokerProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • BingoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • LotteryState monopoly (sole exception to a general prohibition)
    Closed
  • Sports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Other event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Exchange bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Fantasy sportsProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Sponsor funded prize no fee linkage: outside_perimeter
  • Skill gamesProhibited
    Closed
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • SweepstakesModels agree
    Open
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Models agree
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2B
    Restricted
  • Affiliate marketingModels agree
    Open
    Varies by form · 1
    • Online casino affiliate marketing: prohibited
  • Payments for gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Class-level certainty is graded for 12 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Japan: online gambling fully prohibited and prosecuted; only a single land-based IR (Osaka) is licensed.

What has changed

  • The September 2025 amendment to the Anti-Gambling Addiction Act banned new online casinos and online ads and reached offshore operators presenting sites to Japanese residents; NPA enforcement against users and intermediaries intensified through 2024–2025.

What to do now

  • Do not target Japan online; ensure robust geo-blocking of JP residents, avoid any JP-facing marketing or affiliate activity, and treat the only viable route as CMC-certified B2B supply to a licensed land-based IR.

What to watch

  • Second IR licensing round (~2026–2027), MIC ISP-blocking decision, and any movement on sports-betting liberalisation.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Unfavourable

Japan's integrated-resort market structure remains anchored by a single approved licence, MGM Resorts' Osaka IR at Yumeshima, with two of the three statutory licences contemplated under the IR framework still unallocated. The standing legal foundation for gambling-dependency policy is the Gambling D…

Full analysis · 123 words

Japan's integrated-resort market structure remains anchored by a single approved licence, MGM Resorts' Osaka IR at Yumeshima, with two of the three statutory licences contemplated under the IR framework still unallocated. The standing legal foundation for gambling-dependency policy is the Gambling Dependency Countermeasures Basic Act (Act No. 74 of 2018), durable primary legislation that defines "gambling etc." as public sporting competitions, pachinko-parlour-related games, and other games of chance conducted pursuant to law. The dominant development this cycle is not on the land-based IR side but on the online-gambling side: an amendment to that Basic Act, effective 25 September 2025, independently criminalises the presentation and inducement of illegal online-gambling websites, materially tightening the enforcement environment even as the underlying IR licensing structure remains stable.

  • Online gambling comprehensively prohibited and actively prosecuted
  • IR licences capped at three nationally, only one approved
  • Criminal exposure for offshore operators and their personnel
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Unfavourable

A Cabinet Order dated 10 March 2026, issued under the IR District Development Act, opened a second IR casino licensing round, with an application window running from 6 May 2026 to 5 November 2027, for up to two further casino licenses. This is a confirmed, dated liberalising instrument that expands …

Full analysis · 128 words

A Cabinet Order dated 10 March 2026, issued under the IR District Development Act, opened a second IR casino licensing round, with an application window running from 6 May 2026 to 5 November 2027, for up to two further casino licenses. This is a confirmed, dated liberalising instrument that expands the licensing framework beyond the single existing licensed integrated resort. Separately, the Japan Casino Regulatory Commission's supplier and manufacturer licensing category has become operationally active, with Konami Gaming Inc. becoming the first company to submit license applications across all applicable categories to the JCRC, on 8 July 2026. Together these developments confirm that both the operator-side and supplier-side licensing pathways under the IR District Development Act framework are now functioning in administrative practice, not merely established in statute.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Unfavourable

Online gambling: entry is not possible; criminal prohibition applies to operators and their Japan-based personnel, and the September 2025 amendment reaches offshore operators presenting sites to JP residents. IR casino: entry requires an extraordinarily long-term investment (10+ years application-to…

Full analysis · 77 words

Online gambling: entry is not possible; criminal prohibition applies to operators and their Japan-based personnel, and the September 2025 amendment reaches offshore operators presenting sites to JP residents. IR casino: entry requires an extraordinarily long-term investment (10+ years application-to-opening), partnership with Japanese entities, billions of USD in capital, and high political/reputational risk. The only near-term commercial opportunity is as a CMC-certified B2B equipment supplier to an IR operator. For mainstream online operators, Japan is a watch-and-wait jurisdiction.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Unfavourable

Online gambling: not applicable (prohibited). IR casino licence and entry costs are extraordinarily high — initial capex for the Osaka IR is ~JPY1.27 trillion (≈US$8.9bn). The IR Implementation Act sets significant application and ongoing licence fees, with area certification adding prefectural fees…

Full analysis · 55 words

Online gambling: not applicable (prohibited). IR casino licence and entry costs are extraordinarily high — initial capex for the Osaka IR is ~JPY1.27 trillion (≈US$8.9bn). The IR Implementation Act sets significant application and ongoing licence fees, with area certification adding prefectural fees. Total entry cost for an IR operator is in the billions of USD.

05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Unfavourable

Online gambling: not applicable (prohibited). IR casino gross gaming revenue is taxed at 30% (split between national and prefectural governments). Player winnings are taxable as occasional income under the Income Tax Act. Consumption tax of 10% applies to IR casino services. The 30% GGR rate makes J…

Full analysis · 55 words

Online gambling: not applicable (prohibited). IR casino gross gaming revenue is taxed at 30% (split between national and prefectural governments). Player winnings are taxable as occasional income under the Income Tax Act. Consumption tax of 10% applies to IR casino services. The 30% GGR rate makes Japan one of the highest-taxed potential casino markets globally.

06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Unfavourable

Online gambling: all Japanese domestic payment methods are targeted for blocking. The NPA, FSA and METI collaborate to suppress remittances and card payments to online casinos, with METI engaging international card schemes and issuers to remove operators from the payment network. The June 2025 Payme…

Full analysis · 91 words

Online gambling: all Japanese domestic payment methods are targeted for blocking. The NPA, FSA and METI collaborate to suppress remittances and card payments to online casinos, with METI engaging international card schemes and issuers to remove operators from the payment network. The June 2025 Payment Services Act amendment updated crypto-asset, stablecoin and fund-transfer-service rules (effective within one year). Offshore operators cannot legally process JPY payments for online gambling to Japanese residents. IR casino payments will operate within a strict AML/CFT framework under the Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Unfavourable

Marketing of online gambling to Japanese residents is illegal. The September 2025 amendment to the Anti-Gambling Addiction Act explicitly bans the posting of online ads for illegal online casinos, including on social media, and bans the launch of new online casinos including smartphone apps. Japanes…

Full analysis · 96 words

Marketing of online gambling to Japanese residents is illegal. The September 2025 amendment to the Anti-Gambling Addiction Act explicitly bans the posting of online ads for illegal online casinos, including on social media, and bans the launch of new online casinos including smartphone apps. Japanese advertising-industry guidelines already required members to refrain from advertising offshore online gambling to JP residents. IR casino advertising will be tightly restricted under the IR framework, with no advertising permitted near schools or welfare facilities. Pachinko marketing is subject to industry self-regulation. No affiliate marketing of online gambling is legally permissible.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Unfavourable

Online gambling: no technical compliance framework applies (prohibited). IR casino: the CMC has published technical standards for casino equipment and IT systems, requiring electromagnetic equipment inspection and self-examination/reporting for non-electromagnetic equipment. RNG and game-fairness re…

Full analysis · 63 words

Online gambling: no technical compliance framework applies (prohibited). IR casino: the CMC has published technical standards for casino equipment and IT systems, requiring electromagnetic equipment inspection and self-examination/reporting for non-electromagnetic equipment. RNG and game-fairness requirements apply. Data handling is governed by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI); there is no general data-localisation mandate. Incident reporting to the CMC is required.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Unfavourable

The 2025 amendment to the Gambling Dependency Countermeasures Basic Act, effective 25 September 2025, gives police the power to request that platforms and internet service providers take down content that presents or induces use of illegal online-gambling websites. This extends Japan's enforcement r…

Full analysis · 106 words

The 2025 amendment to the Gambling Dependency Countermeasures Basic Act, effective 25 September 2025, gives police the power to request that platforms and internet service providers take down content that presents or induces use of illegal online-gambling websites. This extends Japan's enforcement reach directly into distribution infrastructure, targeting the channels, such as social-media posts, affiliate links, and aggregator sites, through which offshore online-casino operators reach Japanese users, rather than only the underlying gambling platform. The power is statutorily grounded but operates as an administrative request mechanism, and no dedicated enforcement-events register was located this cycle to show how frequently or against whom it has been exercised.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Unfavourable

The material enforcement development this cycle is the 25 September 2025 entry into force of an amendment to the Gambling Dependency Countermeasures Basic Act, which makes presentation or introduction of illegal online-gambling websites, and internet-based inducement of unspecified persons toward su…

Full analysis · 167 words

The material enforcement development this cycle is the 25 September 2025 entry into force of an amendment to the Gambling Dependency Countermeasures Basic Act, which makes presentation or introduction of illegal online-gambling websites, and internet-based inducement of unspecified persons toward such gambling, independently unlawful, separate from the wagering offence itself. This is confirmed, durable statutory law, corroborated by a Tokyo Metropolitan Government notice and Nikkei's coverage of the 18 June 2025 Diet vote. Alongside the new offence, national and local government, including the Tokyo Metropolitan Government and the National Police Agency, have been given public-awareness duties, and police have been empowered to request takedown of qualifying content from platforms and internet service providers; this implementing power is fragile, resting on administrative direction rather than statute, and is revocable by future guidance change. No dedicated JCRC enforcement-events register was located this cycle, so the practical cadence of takedown requests and prosecutions under the new offence cannot yet be evidenced directly, only the statutory grant of the power itself.

ConfirmedAI-generated11 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Unfavourable

Direction: slow IR-only liberalisation. A second licensing round is in preparation — a cabinet-order public-comment period ran August–December 2025, with an application window targeted for ~2026–2027; Hokkaido, Nagasaki, Tokyo and Yokosuka have signalled interest, and the government retains authorit…

Full analysis · 79 words

Direction: slow IR-only liberalisation. A second licensing round is in preparation — a cabinet-order public-comment period ran August–December 2025, with an application window targeted for ~2026–2027; Hokkaido, Nagasaki, Tokyo and Yokosuka have signalled interest, and the government retains authority for up to two further IRs. Online gambling remains firmly prohibited with the regime tightening (September 2025 amendment). The Osaka IR targets an Autumn 2030 opening. Japan is a long-term monitoring jurisdiction for online operators, not a near-term entry opportunity.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 3 enforcement · 25 red flags · 15 sources · Expand full record

Enforcement record

What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 3 recorded events.

  1. 1 Nov 2024
    National Police Agency · 57 individuals (crypto-funded offshore gambling)
    Confirmed
    Sources
  2. 1 Sep 2024
    National Police Agency · Offshore-gambling payment intermediaries (~10,000 users)
    Confirmed
    Sources
  3. 1 Feb 2024
    National Police Agency · Isle of Man-licensed online gaming site personnel
    Confirmed
    Sources

What gets operators fined

25 red flags (10 high, 11 medium, 1 low) and 5 controls that address them.

  • high
    Advertising online gambling to JP residents
    Banned under the Sep 2025 Anti-Gambling Addiction Act amendment including social media.
    Sources
  • high
    Processing JPY card/bank payments for online gambling
    METI/FSA/NPA coordinate to remove operators from payment networks; rails are being actively interdicted.
    Sources
  • high
    Failure to geo-block JP residents
    Conservatively constitutes 'presenting' a website under the amended Act; offshore operators must geo-block.
    Sources
  • high
    Individual JP residents using offshore casinos
    Users including celebrities and athletes have been referred to prosecutors; criminal liability applies to players.
    Sources
  • high
    Distributing real-money gambling apps to JP users
    App stores do not permit them; the Sep 2025 amendment bans new online casino apps.
    Sources
  • high
    Treating Japan as a near-term online opportunity
    Online prohibition is entrenched and tightening; only IR land-based access exists, on a 10+ year horizon.
    Sources
  • high
    Crypto-funded offshore gambling
    57 individuals were referred to prosecutors for crypto-funded offshore gambling in Nov 2024.
    Sources
  • high
    Affiliate marketing of offshore gambling targeting JP
    Advertising guidelines and the amended Act prohibit directing JP residents to illegal online gambling.
    Sources
  • high
    Crypto/stablecoin rails for JP gambling
    June 2025 PSA amendment tightens crypto/stablecoin rules; crypto gambling is actively prosecuted.
    Sources
  • high
    Hub-jurisdiction licensee assuming insulation
    Japan reaches offshore operators via 'presenting' prohibition and card-scheme de-risking pressure.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming a B2B online supply licence is obtainable
    No online B2B pathway exists; only CMC-certified land-based IR equipment supply is available.
    Sources
  • medium
    Underestimating IR effective tax burden
    30% GGR tax plus 10% consumption tax makes Japan one of the highest-taxed casino markets.
    Sources
  • medium
    Acquiring ≥5% of an IR operator without CMC clearance
    Punishable by imprisonment up to one year or fine up to JPY1m.
    Sources
  • medium
    Relying on ISP-blocking absence to operate
    MIC is developing ISP-blocking obligations; the regulatory window is closing.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming skill games escape the gambling definition
    Chance is satisfied if any accidental circumstance can affect outcome; only no-stake or sponsor-funded models are safe.
    Sources
  • medium
    Using cash-equivalent 'amusement' framing to avoid gambling rules
    Supreme Court held cash never qualifies as momentary amusement regardless of amount.
    Sources
  • medium
    Expecting more than three IR licences near-term
    Cap is three nationally; only one approved; expansion review only ~seven years after initial approval.
    Sources
  • medium
    Underestimating IR capital requirement
    Osaka IR capex ~JPY1.27 trillion (~US$8.9bn); only well-capitalised consortia are viable.
    Sources
  • medium
    Reputational fallout from JP enforcement
    Celebrity and athlete referrals receive heavy media coverage; reputational risk is acute.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming no IR technical certification
    CMC requires equipment inspection and self-examination/reporting; non-compliance risks licence action.
    Sources
  • medium
    Confusing pachinko tolerance with legal online access
    Pachinko's grey-area tolerance does not extend to online gambling, which is prohibited.
    Sources
  • low
    Treating sports-betting liberalisation as imminent
    Discussions exist but strong opposition remains; no enacted reform.
    Sources
  • critical
    Operating online gambling for JP residents
    Criminal offence under Penal Code Art. 185–186; no licence pathway exists.
    Sources
  • critical
    Foreign licence assumed to protect operator
    Isle of Man-licensed operator personnel were arrested in Japan; home licence affords no defence.
    Sources
  • critical
    Operating a payment-collection intermediary for offshore gambling
    Operators collecting and paying out winnings to ~10,000 users were arrested in Sep 2024.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    Strict geo-blocking of JP residents
    Technically and voluntarily make the site inaccessible to users located in Japan to avoid 'presenting' under the amended Act.
    Sources
  • 002
    JP-facing marketing suppression
    Suppress all advertising, affiliate and influencer activity directed at Japanese residents.
    Sources
  • 003
    JPY payment-rail avoidance
    Avoid processing JPY card/bank/e-money payments for gambling given inter-agency interdiction.
    Sources
  • 004
    CMC suitability & ≥5% shareholder clearance
    For IR participation, obtain CMC clearance before acquiring ≥5% of an operator.
    Sources
  • 005
    Equipment certification compliance
    Comply with CMC technical standards and equipment inspection for IR supply.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

MGA-licensed operator wishes to accept JP-resident players.

Online gambling is prohibited under Penal Code Art. 185–186 regardless of foreign licence; the Sep 2025 amendment reaches offshore operators presenting sites to JP residents. The Isle of Man case shows arrests are real.

Do this: Do not accept JP players; implement strict geo-blocking.

Sources

Software supplier wants to enter the Japanese market.

No online B2B pathway exists. The only route is CMC-certified casino-related equipment supply to a licensed land-based IR.

Do this: Pursue CMC equipment certification for IR supply; do not pursue online B2B.

Sources

Affiliate network plans JP-language casino review content.

Directing JP residents to illegal online gambling is prohibited; advertising guidelines also bar offshore-gambling promotion.

Do this: Exclude Japan from all targeting and content distribution.

Sources

Operator considers crypto rails to serve JP players discreetly.

Crypto-funded offshore gambling is actively prosecuted (57 referrals Nov 2024); June 2025 PSA tightens crypto rules.

Do this: Do not use crypto rails for JP players; the channel is targeted.

Sources

Consortium evaluates bidding for a second IR licence.

A second round is in preparation (~2026–2027) for up to two IRs; entry requires billions in capital, local partnership, rigorous CMC suitability, and 30% GGR tax.

Do this: Engage early with a prefecture and JP counsel; budget for very long timelines and high tax.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Baseline.cost to operate. precise IR application and annual licence fee figures not directly sourced in this run; only GGR tax rate and capex confirmed.
  • searched: Japan IR casino licence fee amount JPY
  • searched: Casino Regulatory Commission application fee schedule
  • searched: IR Implementation Act licence fee annual
  • checked: casino.jp
Baseline.competitive landscape. no published unlicensed online market share figure beyond the NPA ~3.37m-user estimate; share-of-spend not quantified.
  • searched: Japan online casino market size estimate
  • searched: Japan illegal online gambling spend JPY
  • searched: NPA online casino users survey 2025
  • checked: npa.go.jp

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

Online gambling is illegal in Japan under Penal Code Articles 185 and 186, including offshore sites, and is actively prosecuted.

JP-CP-001 · T3 of 4 (asserted T2, shown at its source's tier) · published 5 Feb 2025 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources