Jurisdictions Liechtenstein
LI

Liechtenstein

LI
⚠ Amber — Proceed with cautionT2Updated 2026-07-05
Market verdict: Partial — Land-based entry is technically open via the police-permit model but practically constrained by high capital requirements (CHF 5,000,000 minimum share capital) and a saturated/contracting market of five operating casinos.
Last updated: 2026-07-05
AmberBoard Briefing
2026-07-05
Liechtenstein: land-based-only market under contraction; online closed until 2028.
What has changed
GGR fell approximately 58.9% year-on-year through Q3 2025; only five casinos remain operational and the national casino trade association dissolved in March 2025.
↗ GSG-2010-235
What to do now
Do not pursue online entry — moratorium runs through 31.12.2028. For land-based interest, model economics against a shrinking incumbent base and rising capital/compliance costs before committing.
What to watch
Any statutory amendment to the GSG tax schedule, early termination of the online moratorium, or further consolidation among the five remaining casino operators.
Overall posture
partial

Liechtenstein permits land-based casino gambling under the Gambling Act (GSG, 2010, as amended 2016) via a police-permit entitlement model administered by the Office of Economic Affairs (AVW). Online gambling remains under an extended moratorium (casino permits suspended to end-2025; online concessions suspended to end-2028), so no lawful online offering currently exists. The land-based sector is contracting sharply in 2025 amid rising compliance costs and cross-border exclusion-sharing with Switzerland, though a 2023 referendum affirmed continued public support for the sector.

AmberSummary
2026-07-05

Land-based entry is technically open via the police-permit model but practically constrained by high capital requirements (CHF 5,000,000 minimum share capital) and a saturated/contracting market of five operating casinos.

Market status
conditional
Overall RAG
Amber
Regulatory posture
partial
Time to revenue
12+ months
Capital req.
see assessment
Confidence
Probable
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
RedMarket Opportunity
2026-07-05

The Liechtenstein casino market is small and contracting sharply. Gross gaming revenue fell from EUR 15.95 million in Q1 2025 to EUR 13.17 million in Q3 2025, representing a year-on-year decline of approximately 58.9 percent through Q3 2025 — a contraction of a magnitude that places the growth trajectory firmly in the contracting category.

· ~1 min read

These figures are assessed at the Assessed confidence tier from T2 trade-press sources corroborated across two outlets. The dissolution of the Liechtenstein Casino Association in March 2025 — assessed at low confidence from a single T2 source — is a further structural signal of sector deterioration. The online segment, which might otherwise represent a growth offset, is foreclosed by the government moratorium through end-2028, leaving the addressable market confined to a five-casino land-based sector in a micro-jurisdiction of approximately 38,000 residents. Unmet demand signals and unlicensed market share estimates are wholly unevidenced this cycle. For an operator assessing market opportunity, the combination of a contracting GGR base, a closed online channel, and a dissolving trade body presents a deeply unfavourable commercial picture.

Growth Trajectory
contracting
Market Size Band
small
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberLicensing & Regulation
2026-07-05

Land-based casino licensing is administered by the Office of Economic Affairs (AVW) under a police-permit model introduced in 2016. Online licensing is formally provided for under the GSG framework but is suspended by government moratorium through 31.12.2028; no online concessions are currently issued.

Licensing required
yes
B2B licensing
unclear

Land-based entry is technically open via the police-permit model but practically constrained by high capital requirements (CHF 5,000,000 minimum share capital) and a saturated/contracting market of five operating casinos. Online entry is closed until at least end-2028.

T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
Regulated Activity Classes
2026-07-05
casino
open — GSG, LGBl. 2010/235 as amended
lottery
open — GSG / Lottery and Betting Ordinance (LWV)
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
Entry Pathways
2026-07-05

Liechtenstein offers two principal entry pathways under the Gambling Act (GSG, LGBl. 2010 No. 235): a land-based casino permit and an online gambling concession. The land-based permit pathway is operational under the police-permit entitlement model introduced by the 2016 GSG amendment (LGBl. 2016 No.

· ~1 min read

308), which replaced the earlier concession-tender approach following litigation over allocation. Under this model, any applicant satisfying the statutory conditions is entitled to a permit; the issuing authority is the Office of Economic Affairs (AVW). Key conditions include a minimum share capital of CHF 5,000,000 and an ongoing equity-ratio test of 30 percent of total assets or 20 percent of GGR, whichever is higher — both assessed at low confidence from T2 sources pending T1 statutory citation. The online concession pathway is formally provided for in statute but is not currently open: concession processing is suspended until 31 December 2028 under a government moratorium, a fragile instrument. No B2B licensing pathway for software or platform suppliers has been confirmed as existing or absent in the retrieved record; this is a structural gap requiring direct statutory review. The lottery retail channel is classified as open under the Lottery and Betting Ordinance (LWV) and GSG on a mixed-durability basis.

Licence types
2 types
B2B licensing
1 services
Key conditions
2 conditions
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
GreenPlayer Protection
2026-07-05

Player protection in Liechtenstein rests on a central player-ban register and document-based age verification at casino entry, with the framework strengthened in January 2025 by the introduction of automatic mutual recognition of gambling exclusion orders between Switzerland and Liechtenstein — effective 7 January 2025, assessed at low confidence from a single T2 source and classified as a fragile instrument. This cross-border mechanism means that a player excluded in Switzerland is automatically recognised as excluded in Liechtenstein and vice versa, expanding the practical reach of the self-exclusion system beyond the domestic licensed estate. GSG Article 10 mandates access controls and video surveillance as part of the social-protection concept, assessed at low confidence from a T2 secondary-source paraphrase. The player protection practical burden is assessed as moderate — the Interpreter-computed value reflecting confirmed self-exclusion and age-verification obligations against the absence of evidenced deposit-limit and reality-check regimes this cycle. No dedicated gambling-marketing restriction regime distinct from general consumer-protection principles was identified. Deposit limits and reality-check requirements remain wholly unevidenced and represent a structural gap in the current baseline.

+1 paragraph · ~1 min read

No dedicated marketing-restriction regime for gambling was identified in retrieved sources beyond general consumer-protection principles under the GSG. Cross-border advertising by foreign online operators into LI is not blocked at network level.

Confidence
Probable
Traffic Light
green
Player Protection Practical Burden Enum
moderate
Narrative
Player protection in Liechtenstein rests on a central player-ban register and document-based age verification at casino entry, with the framework strengthened in January 2025 by the introduction of automatic mutual recognition of gambling exclusion orders between Switzerland and Liechtenstein — effective 7 January 2025, assessed at low confidence from a single T2 source and classified as a fragile instrument. This cross-border mechanism means that a player excluded in Switzerland is automatically recognised as excluded in Liechtenstein and vice versa, expanding the practical reach of the self-exclusion system beyond the domestic licensed estate. GSG Article 10 mandates access controls and video surveillance as part of the social-protection concept, assessed at low confidence from a T2 secondary-source paraphrase. The player protection practical burden is assessed as moderate — the Interpreter-computed value reflecting confirmed self-exclusion and age-verification obligations against the absence of evidenced deposit-limit and reality-check regimes this cycle. No dedicated gambling-marketing restriction regime distinct from general consumer-protection principles was identified. Deposit limits and reality-check requirements remain wholly unevidenced and represent a structural gap in the current baseline.
Player Protection Marketing Vulnerable Rules
No dedicated gambling-marketing restriction regime targeting vulnerable persons, beyond general consumer-protection principles applicable under Liechtenstein law, was identified in the retrieved record this cycle. The absence of a confirmed marketing-specific regime is a structural gap; operators should not assume that no restrictions apply and should seek direct statutory confirmation before deploying marketing directed at Liechtenstein residents.
Player Protection Marketing Minors Rules
No specific gambling-marketing restriction regime targeting minors, beyond the general age-verification and access-control requirements under GSG Article 10, was identified in the retrieved record this cycle. GSG Article 10 mandates access controls at casino entry, which implicitly encompasses age-gating, but no advertising-specific age-restriction rule was evidenced. This is a structural gap requiring direct statutory review.
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberDistribution & Platform Rules
2026-07-05

Not applicable at present given the online moratorium — no licensed digital distribution channel exists domestically.

Narrative
Not applicable at present given the online moratorium — no licensed digital distribution channel exists domestically.
Traffic Light
amber
Confidence
Uncertain
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
GreenEnforcement
2026-07-05

Enforcement is administered by AVW (licence conditions, land-based compliance) and FMA (AML/SPG). No network blocking of unlicensed online providers is currently part of the Liechtenstein model, distinguishing it from neighbouring Switzerland's DNS-blocking approach.

+1 paragraph · ~1 min read

Enforcement authority in Liechtenstein is divided between the Office of Economic Affairs (AVW), which holds licence-withdrawal powers under the GSG, and the Financial Market Authority (FMA), which supervises AML/CFT compliance under the durable SPG primary statute. The enforcement posture is characterised as risk-based and licensee-focused, with low 12-month enforcement volume — assessed at low confidence, inferred from the absence of reported enforcement actions rather than from a directly quoted source. No enforcement events were evidenced this cycle, and the mandatory null-escape rule applies: no illustrative event has been synthesised. Liechtenstein does not operate network-level DNS or IP blocking of unlicensed online operators, distinguishing it from the Swiss model and reducing the practical enforcement exposure for unlicensed cross-border online services directed at Liechtenstein residents. In the civil-law framework applicable here, the enforcement theory against unlicensed operators rests on the statutory licensing stack: gambling is licit only under the explicit permission of the GSG and its implementing instruments, meaning an unlicensed operator commits an offence under the gambling statute itself. The primary enforcement vectors are AVW regulatory action and FMA AML supervisory action; no criminal prosecution route for unlicensed online gambling was evidenced this cycle. The extraterritorial risk trajectory is assessed as low but increasing, driven by deepening CH-LI regulatory cooperation including the new cross-border self-exclusion recognition mechanism.

Enforcement Style
risk_based
Enforcement Targeting
licensed
Enforcement Summary Last 12M
low
Enforcement Style
risk_based
Enforcement Targeting
licensed
Enforcement Summary Last 12M
low
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberExtraterritorial Reach
2026-07-05
Traffic light
amber
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberAML / CFT
2026-07-05

Liechtenstein casinos are designated reporting entities under the Due Diligence Act (Sorgfaltspflichtgesetz, SPG), a durable primary statute that forms the domestic AML/CFT legislative foundation. The Financial Market Authority (FMA) is the supervising body for casino AML/CFT compliance, assessed at low confidence from T2 sources.

· ~1 min read

The SPG framework is aligned with the broader EEA AML architecture, and the designated-reporting-entity status for casinos is consistent with FATF/MONEYVAL standards for the sector. The AML/CFT practical burden is assessed as significant — the Interpreter-computed value reflecting the combination of designated-reporting-entity obligations, FMA supervision, and the EEA-aligned compliance infrastructure expected of a MONEYVAL-member jurisdiction. In practical terms, this means casinos must maintain customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence programmes, file suspicious transaction reports, and sustain a dedicated compliance function. No FATF/MONEYVAL mutual evaluation report citation was retrieved this cycle, which is a structural gap: the precise list status and detailed compliance-burden calibration remain reliant on secondary-source characterisation rather than primary MONEYVAL documentation. Specific STR/CTR thresholds were not evidenced this cycle. The tipping-off prohibition applicable to SPG reporting entities is a standard feature of FATF-aligned frameworks, but no specific statutory provision was cited in the retrieved record this cycle.

Designated Reporting Entity
True
Aml Cft Obligations Band
high
Confidence
Probable
Traffic Light
amber
Aml Cft Practical Burden Enum
significant
Narrative
Liechtenstein casinos are designated reporting entities under the Due Diligence Act (Sorgfaltspflichtgesetz, SPG), a durable primary statute that forms the domestic AML/CFT legislative foundation. The Financial Market Authority (FMA) is the supervising body for casino AML/CFT compliance, assessed at low confidence from T2 sources. The SPG framework is aligned with the broader EEA AML architecture, and the designated-reporting-entity status for casinos is consistent with FATF/MONEYVAL standards for the sector. The AML/CFT practical burden is assessed as significant — the Interpreter-computed value reflecting the combination of designated-reporting-entity obligations, FMA supervision, and the EEA-aligned compliance infrastructure expected of a MONEYVAL-member jurisdiction. In practical terms, this means casinos must maintain customer due diligence and enhanced due diligence programmes, file suspicious transaction reports, and sustain a dedicated compliance function. No FATF/MONEYVAL mutual evaluation report citation was retrieved this cycle, which is a structural gap: the precise list status and detailed compliance-burden calibration remain reliant on secondary-source characterisation rather than primary MONEYVAL documentation. Specific STR/CTR thresholds were not evidenced this cycle. The tipping-off prohibition applicable to SPG reporting entities is a standard feature of FATF-aligned frameworks, but no specific statutory provision was cited in the retrieved record this cycle.
Aml Tipping Off Provisions Narrative
No specific tipping-off or confidentiality provision under the Liechtenstein Due Diligence Act (SPG) or any other statute was cited in the retrieved record this cycle. As a MONEYVAL-member jurisdiction with an SPG framework aligned to EEA AML standards, a tipping-off prohibition applicable to designated reporting entities — including casinos — would be expected as a standard feature of the framework, but its precise statutory form, scope, and any safe-harbour provisions for internal escalation cannot be confirmed from the available evidence. This is flagged as a structural gap requiring direct SPG statutory review.
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
GreenTechnical Compliance
2026-07-05

Casinos must connect all gambling machines and jackpot systems to the EACS (electronic gambling machine monitoring/control system) per the Casino Ordinance, enabling GGR and payout-ratio calculation; game rules require AVW approval.

Narrative
Casinos must connect all gambling machines and jackpot systems to the EACS (electronic gambling machine monitoring/control system) per the Casino Ordinance, enabling GGR and payout-ratio calculation; game rules require AVW approval.
Traffic Light
green
Game Approval Process
pre_launch_approval
Data Localisation
none
Hosting Requirements
domestic
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
GreenOperational Obligations
2026-07-05

Licensed casino operators in Liechtenstein face a defined set of operational obligations under the GSG and its implementing Casino Ordinance (SPBV). All gambling machines and jackpot systems must maintain continuous connectivity to the EACS monitoring system, which calculates GGR and payout ratios in real time; this requirement is assessed at the Assessed confidence tier from a T1 source and rests on a mixed-durability basis — the enabling act is durable, the implementing ordinance detail is delegated.

· ~1 min read

Game rules require AVW pre-launch approval before any new game or machine type may be offered to players. Under GSG Article 10, operators must implement a mandatory social-protection concept encompassing access controls, video surveillance, IT security measures, and a minimum 45-day data retention period — assessed at low confidence from a T2 secondary-source paraphrase of the article, pending direct statutory citation. Reporting obligations to the FMA under the SPG AML framework apply in parallel. No online operational obligations are currently active given the moratorium; the obligations described here apply exclusively to the land-based casino channel.

Confidence
Probable
Traffic Light
green
Narrative
Licensed casino operators in Liechtenstein face a defined set of operational obligations under the GSG and its implementing Casino Ordinance (SPBV). All gambling machines and jackpot systems must maintain continuous connectivity to the EACS monitoring system, which calculates GGR and payout ratios in real time; this requirement is assessed at the Assessed confidence tier from a T1 source and rests on a mixed-durability basis — the enabling act is durable, the implementing ordinance detail is delegated. Game rules require AVW pre-launch approval before any new game or machine type may be offered to players. Under GSG Article 10, operators must implement a mandatory social-protection concept encompassing access controls, video surveillance, IT security measures, and a minimum 45-day data retention period — assessed at low confidence from a T2 secondary-source paraphrase of the article, pending direct statutory citation. Reporting obligations to the FMA under the SPG AML framework apply in parallel. No online operational obligations are currently active given the moratorium; the obligations described here apply exclusively to the land-based casino channel.
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberCost to Operate
2026-07-05

The cost-to-operate picture for a Liechtenstein land-based casino permit holder is defined by high structural capital requirements and an imprecisely quantified tax burden. The minimum share capital of CHF 5,000,000 and the ongoing equity-ratio test — requiring the higher of 30 percent of total assets or 20 percent of GGR — represent a substantial entry and maintenance cost floor, assessed at low confidence from T2 sources against the durable GSG statutory basis. The current statutory GGR tax schedule has not been confirmed from a named T1 source this cycle; the only quantified effective rate available is a 2018 historical combined tax-and-fee rate of 34.5 percent of GGR, which the Interpreter has computed as the effective rate after deductions. This figure should be treated as an indicative historical reference rather than a confirmed current rate. Operators should budget for a significant AML/CFT compliance lift — the burden is assessed as significant given designated-reporting-entity status under the SPG — and a moderate player-protection compliance lift reflecting confirmed self-exclusion and age-verification obligations alongside unevidenced deposit-limit and reality-check requirements.

+2 paragraphs · ~1 min read

Historical data (2018) shows a combined effective tax-and-fee rate of approximately 34.5% of GGR for casinos. Current-year statutory rate schedule and any post-2022 amendments were not confirmed against a named T1 statutory citation in this pass — flagged as a coverage gap.

Minimum share capital of CHF 5,000,000 and an ongoing equity ratio of 30% of total assets or 20% of GGR (whichever higher) apply to casino permit holders. Specific application/annual fee schedule not confirmed from a named T1 source in this pass.

Tax Basis
GGR
Confidence
Uncertain
Traffic Light
amber
Effective Rate After Deductions Pct
34.5
Narrative
The cost-to-operate picture for a Liechtenstein land-based casino permit holder is defined by high structural capital requirements and an imprecisely quantified tax burden. The minimum share capital of CHF 5,000,000 and the ongoing equity-ratio test — requiring the higher of 30 percent of total assets or 20 percent of GGR — represent a substantial entry and maintenance cost floor, assessed at low confidence from T2 sources against the durable GSG statutory basis. The current statutory GGR tax schedule has not been confirmed from a named T1 source this cycle; the only quantified effective rate available is a 2018 historical combined tax-and-fee rate of 34.5 percent of GGR, which the Interpreter has computed as the effective rate after deductions. This figure should be treated as an indicative historical reference rather than a confirmed current rate. Operators should budget for a significant AML/CFT compliance lift — the burden is assessed as significant given designated-reporting-entity status under the SPG — and a moderate player-protection compliance lift reflecting confirmed self-exclusion and age-verification obligations alongside unevidenced deposit-limit and reality-check requirements.
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberPayments & Money Flow
2026-07-05

No online payments regime is currently active given the online moratorium. Land-based casinos operate under standard EEA banking access as regulated entities subject to FMA AML oversight.

Confidence
Uncertain
Traffic Light
amber
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberCompetitive Landscape
2026-07-05

The Liechtenstein casino market is highly concentrated among a small number of operator groups. Trade-press reporting — assessed at low confidence from T2 sources without T1 regulator-register confirmation — places the operating casino count at five as of late 2025, down from a broader base in the 2019-2023 period.

· ~1 min read

The market is dominated by two to three operator groups, with Admiral and Casinos Austria International identified as the principal incumbents. The Liechtenstein Casino Association dissolved in March 2025, assessed at low confidence from a single T2 source, removing the sector's collective-representation body at a moment of acute commercial stress. Unlicensed market share is wholly unevidenced this cycle and is logged as a structural gap. The online segment is dormant pending the moratorium, meaning there is no licensed digital competitive landscape to assess. For a prospective entrant, the competitive environment is characterised by a contracting incumbent base, high capitalisation requirements that deter new entry, and a sector in structural demand erosion — conditions that reduce competitive intensity but also reduce the commercial rationale for entry.

Licensed Operator Count
5
Market Concentration
highly_concentrated
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›
AmberReform Horizon
2026-07-05

Near-term outlook is dominated by the online moratorium (through end-2028) and a contracting land-based market (GGR down ~58.9% YoY through Q3 2025, operator count down to five casinos, industry association dissolved March 2025). The January 2023 referendum (73% against closure) provides political durability for the existing land-based sector despite commercial headwinds.

Reform Stage
none
Regulatory Direction
tightening
Reform Horizon Scenario Outlook
The reform horizon for Liechtenstein is dominated by a single instrument: the government moratorium on online gambling concession processing, extended through 31 December 2028. Under the base scenario, the moratorium runs its course, the land-based sector continues to contract, and no new licensing pathways open before 2029. Under the adverse scenario, the land-based sector deteriorates further — through additional tax or regulatory burden increases, further operator exits, or political pressure to restrict the sector — compressing the commercial case for incumbents and new entrants alike. Under the favourable scenario, fiscal pressure from declining GGR prompts the government to revisit the moratorium before its scheduled expiry, potentially opening a partial or full online licensing pathway ahead of 2029; the January 2023 referendum result, in which an assessed 73 percent of voters opposed closure of the casino sector, provides political cover for such a reversal. No active consultations or draft legislation were identified this cycle.
Outlook Status
uncertain
Reform Stage
none
Traffic Light
amber
Confidence
Probable
T1 Source
GSG-2010-235
https://www.regierung.li/files/medienarchiv/935-511-1-202301
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-002
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-003
View source ›
T3 Source
SRC-LI-004
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-005
View source ›
T2 Source
SRC-LI-006
View source ›