title: Lithuania — Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce? | advennt.io canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/lithuania/enforcement/ [Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [Lithuania](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/lithuania/) Enforcement Lithuania · Question 10 of 11 # Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce? Mixed · Probable · AI-generated · [Back to full Lithuania report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/lithuania/) Key section parameters | Jurisdiction | Lithuania (LT) | |---|---| | Regulator | Recorded in register | | Favourability | Mixed | | Confidence | Probable | | Review status | AI-generated | | Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 | Summary answer The LLI ordered a block against Polymarket on 21 September 2026, treating the platform's event-outcome wagering activity as unlicensed remote gambling or betting under the existing licensing statute, without reliance on any new instrument. This extends the LLI's established website-blocking enforcem… ## Full section analysis The LLI ordered a block against Polymarket on 21 September 2026, treating the platform's event-outcome wagering activity as unlicensed remote gambling or betting under the existing licensing statute, without reliance on any new instrument. This extends the LLI's established website-blocking enforcement mechanism to a platform type, prediction markets, not previously targeted on this record. The action signals an active and expanding enforcement posture: the regulator is applying its current powers to new platform categories offering functionally similar wagering activity, rather than waiting for a bespoke prediction-market rule. For operators, the relevant risk driver is that unlicensed offshore platforms serving Lithuanian users with event-outcome wagering face the same blocking exposure demonstrated here, and that exposure is live now rather than contingent on future legislation.