<!-- Markdown twin of https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/montana/technical/. Same text as the HTML page; the HTML page is canonical. -->
title: Montana — Technical compliance: What must the platform meet? | advennt.io
canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/montana/technical/

[Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [Montana](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/montana/) Technical compliance

 Montana · Question 08 of 11

# Technical compliance: What must the platform meet?

Favourable · Not recorded · AI-generated · [Back to full Montana report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/montana/)

Key section parameters

| Jurisdiction | Montana (US-MT) |
|---|---|
| Regulator | Montana Department of Justice — Gambling Control Division & Montana Lottery |
| Favourability | Favourable |
| Confidence | Not recorded |
| Review status | AI-generated |
| Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 |

Summary answer

VGMs must meet a maximum theoretical payout return limit of 92% and are subject to DOJ testing/approval; tribal Class III machines are tested and approved by the tribe under NIGC Minimum Internal Control Standards, which may be more stringent than state requirements.

## Full section analysis

VGMs must meet a maximum theoretical payout return limit of 92% and are subject to DOJ testing/approval; tribal Class III machines are tested and approved by the tribe under NIGC Minimum Internal Control Standards, which may be more stringent than state requirements.
