title: New Brunswick — Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce? | advennt.io canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/new-brunswick/enforcement/ [Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [New Brunswick](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/new-brunswick/) Enforcement New Brunswick · Question 10 of 11 # Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce? Mixed · Probable · AI-generated · [Back to full New Brunswick report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/new-brunswick/) Key section parameters | Jurisdiction | New Brunswick (CA-NB) | |---|---| | Regulator | Gaming Control Branch (Registrar of Gaming Control), Department of Justice and Public Safety | | Favourability | Mixed | | Confidence | Probable | | Review status | AI-generated | | Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 | Summary answer FINTRAC imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CA$399,712.50 on the New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming Corporation on 24 July 2026, announced 3 September 2026, for non-compliance with Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act. The obligation breached was t… ## Full section analysis FINTRAC imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CA$399,712.50 on the New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming Corporation on 24 July 2026, announced 3 September 2026, for non-compliance with Part 1 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act. The obligation breached was the requirement for a reporting entity to file a suspicious transaction report where there are reasonable grounds to suspect a transaction is related to money laundering or terrorist-activity financing. This is reported as the second Atlantic-region gaming-sector FINTRAC penalty of 2026, following an earlier penalty against Atlantic Lottery Corporation, indicating sustained federal enforcement attention on suspicious-transaction-reporting compliance across the region's provincial lottery and gaming bodies. The maximum sanction figure available under the FINTRAC administrative-monetary-penalty regime for this category of non-compliance was not stated in the source consulted and is not estimated here. No licence-revocation action, criminal referral, or advertising-enforcement event under the Gaming Control Act itself was identified; the exposure identified is specifically federal AML/CFT reporting enforcement against the provincial gaming corporation.