<!-- Markdown twin of https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/north-dakota/enforcement/. Same text as the HTML page; the HTML page is canonical. -->
title: North Dakota — Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce? | advennt.io
canonical: https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/north-dakota/enforcement/

[Jurisdictions](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/) [North Dakota](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/north-dakota/) Enforcement

 North Dakota · Question 10 of 11

# Enforcement: How hard does the regulator enforce?

Mixed · Uncertain · AI-generated · [Back to full North Dakota report →](https://advennt.io/jurisdictions/north-dakota/)

Key section parameters

| Jurisdiction | North Dakota (US-ND) |
|---|---|
| Regulator | North Dakota Office of Attorney General — Gaming Division |
| Favourability | Mixed |
| Confidence | Uncertain |
| Review status | AI-generated |
| Last collected | 18 Oct 2026 |

Summary answer

North Dakota's Gaming Division exercised its licensing-enforcement powers materially. The Attorney General's office revoked the charitable-gaming license of the Beulah Convention and Visitors Bureau, imposed a $50,000 fine, and required repayment of approximately $398,000 in unlawfully distributed f…

## Full section analysis

North Dakota's Gaming Division exercised its licensing-enforcement powers materially. The Attorney General's office revoked the charitable-gaming license of the Beulah Convention and Visitors Bureau, imposed a $50,000 fine, and required repayment of approximately $398,000 in unlawfully distributed funds to a trust account, a confirmed action corroborated by secondary local press coverage. Separately, East Main Investments, LLC (operating the Silver Dollar Bar site) had its site authorization suspended, with part of the suspension deferred over three years, for acting together with a licensed nonprofit organization to violate the state's gaming laws. These are the two most severe enforcement outcomes disclosed this monitoring period and together evidence an intensified enforcement posture reaching both charitable licensees and their commercial site partners. The underlying statutory enforcement authority is durable; the specific enforcement outcomes themselves are episodic rather than standing instruments. No cross-border enforcement or payment-flow risk material was identified.