Jurisdictions › Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Islamic Republic of Pakistan

National jurisdiction

Lawful market entry is impossible: there is no licence, no regulator and active criminal/regulatory exposure for any gambling-related activity.

1 open · 16 closed · 3 uncertain → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 26 Oct 2026 · Changed 25 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • PokerProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • BingoProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • LotteryProhibited
    Closed
  • Sports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Other event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Horse and greyhound racing bettingProhibited · Contested
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • On course totalizator: historical_derogation
  • Esports bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Exchange bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Pool bettingProhibited · Contested
    Closed
  • Virtual event bettingProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Fantasy sportsProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Skill gamesGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Prediction marketsProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • SweepstakesProhibited · Models agree
    Closed
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Contested
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Affiliate marketingGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • Payments for gamblingProhibited · Contested
    Closed

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited
    Closed

Class-level certainty is graded for 18 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Pakistan is a closed, hostile prohibition jurisdiction with no lawful gambling entry pathway.

What has changed

  • Enforcement has shifted online and financial: PTA reported 184 betting/gambling sites blocked under PECA 2016 (Aug 2025), courts are hearing a ban petition, and payment-rail monitoring is intensifying.

What to do now

  • Do not pursue any B2C, B2B, affiliate or payment role touching Pakistan. Treat PK exposure as an AML/legal risk to screen out of global flows.

What to watch

  • The Islamabad High Court ban petition outcome and any move toward systematic payment-rail interdiction.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Unfavourable

Pakistan (~230 million population, >97% Muslim) maintains a near-absolute constitutional and statutory prohibition on all forms of gambling. The federal Prevention of Gambling Act 1977 extends to the whole country and overrides other laws, reinforced by the Pakistan Penal Code and constitutional Isl…

Full analysis · 92 words

Pakistan (~230 million population, >97% Muslim) maintains a near-absolute constitutional and statutory prohibition on all forms of gambling. The federal Prevention of Gambling Act 1977 extends to the whole country and overrides other laws, reinforced by the Pakistan Penal Code and constitutional Islamic injunctions (Articles 31, 227, 37(g)). No gambling regulator, licence, or state lottery exists. A significant illegal offshore market — concentrated on cricket — persists, creating AML and payment-facilitation exposure rather than a commercially accessible market. This is a closed, hostile jurisdiction: a legal/AML risk signal, not an entry opportunity.

  • Absolute constitutional and statutory prohibition with no licence pathway
  • PTA site-blocking under PECA 2016 Section 37
  • Payment-rail monitoring pressure (SBP/FMU; mobile-money directives)
  • Elevated post-FATF-grey-list AML posture
ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Unfavourable

There is no gambling regulator and no licensing framework. The Prevention of Gambling Act 1977 prohibits all gambling and overrides other laws; the only statutory saving (s.11) is for games in a provincially licensed 'tourist complex' admitting foreigners only — a marginal historical derogation, not…

Full analysis · 67 words

There is no gambling regulator and no licensing framework. The Prevention of Gambling Act 1977 prohibits all gambling and overrides other laws; the only statutory saving (s.11) is for games in a provincially licensed 'tourist complex' admitting foreigners only — a marginal historical derogation, not a commercial pathway. No B2C or B2B licence has ever been issued and no state lottery exists. All product classes are prohibited.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Unfavourable

No gambling tax regime exists because gambling is prohibited; the Federal Board of Revenue taxes only lawful activity.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Unfavourable

Banking and payment access for gambling is indefensible. SBP foreign-exchange rules prohibit gambling remittances; AMLA 2010 designates gambling proceeds as proceeds of crime; mobile-money rails (JazzCash, Easypaisa, SadaPay) are exploited via disguised P2P transfers, attracting monitoring pressure.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Unfavourable

All gambling marketing is unlawful. Advertising unregistered gambling sites is treated as an offence under PECA 2016; PEMRA, PTA and PCB are directed not to contract with betting-linked surrogate companies, and the Peshawar High Court barred betting sponsorship of PSL cricket teams.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Unfavourable

No gambling technical-compliance regime exists. Access interdiction is the operative technical posture: PTA blocks gambling domains/apps under PECA 2016 on a complaint basis.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Unfavourable

The National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency's action against 46 applications linked to illegal gambling, unlicensed trading, and data-privacy breaches operated at the distribution and platform-access layer, blocking applications rather than amending any licensing text. This is a probable-confidenc…

Full analysis · 138 words

The National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency's action against 46 applications linked to illegal gambling, unlicensed trading, and data-privacy breaches operated at the distribution and platform-access layer, blocking applications rather than amending any licensing text. This is a probable-confidence finding, corroborated across independent trade-press coverage, though no primary regulator notice from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority or the Federal Investigation Agency was located this cycle to confirm the scope of the block list. The action represents a tightening of the practical barrier facing any gambling-adjacent product that might otherwise reach Pakistani users through app-store or direct-download channels, even though the underlying statutory prohibition under the Prevention of Gambling Act, 1977 has not itself changed. Distribution-layer enforcement of this kind now sits alongside, rather than in place of, the base prohibition as the practical mechanism shaping platform access into the jurisdiction.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Unfavourable

The Federal Investigation Agency intensified action against gambling-linked payment-aggregator flows, with press reporting on 8 October 2026 describing more than PKR 119.93 billion in traced transactions linked to gambling applications. JazzCash closed over one hundred aggregator accounts following …

Full analysis · 209 words

The Federal Investigation Agency intensified action against gambling-linked payment-aggregator flows, with press reporting on 8 October 2026 describing more than PKR 119.93 billion in traced transactions linked to gambling applications. JazzCash closed over one hundred aggregator accounts following FIA notices, with some reporting as high as three hundred, and Easypaisa merchant and aggregator settlements were delayed, affecting six major payment companies. A separate first information report, filed by the FIA's Composite Circle in Faisalabad, names eight suspects connected to six gambling platforms (U7777 Game, TD777, Game89, EPIWIN, B9 Game, S9 Game), alleging use of bank transfers, mobile wallets and USDT for real-money betting, with charges under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 and the Pakistan Penal Code. A single press report also describes the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority blocking forty-six related applications; this figure is not independently corroborated. No FIA or State Bank primary notice has yet been located to corroborate the aggregate transaction figure, which rests on converging press reporting. The statutory basis for accessory liability in both matters is the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947, applied against unlicensed gambling-linked value transfer through mobile wallets and payment aggregators, and the sustained, multi-agency character of the action signals active criminal exposure for any payment channel found to serve gambling platforms.

ConfirmedAI-generated10 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Unfavourable

The constitutional position (Islamic injunctions; Article 37(g)) makes broad legalisation highly unlikely; no formal legislative movement toward liberalisation exists. The trajectory is toward enforcement modernisation — payment monitoring and platform accountability — not market opening.

ConfirmedAI-generatedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 25 red flags · 12 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

25 red flags (10 high, 9 medium, 2 low) and 0 controls that address them.

  • high
    Operating a website accessible in Pakistan
    PTA blocks gambling domains under PECA 2016 Section 37.
    Sources
  • high
    Advertising or sponsorship of any betting brand
    Advertising unregistered gambling is a PECA offence; courts have barred PSL sponsorship.
    Sources
  • high
    Stablecoin settlement for betting
    USDT routing to evade banking filters is an enforcement focus.
    Sources
  • high
    Keeping a common gaming-house
    PGA 1977 s.3 carries imprisonment and fine.
    Sources
  • high
    Supplying software to operators targeting PK
    No B2B pathway exists; supply facilitates unlawful gambling.
    Sources
  • high
    Local agent or cash-out network
    FIA traces betting financial transactions and prosecutes facilitators.
    Sources
  • high
    Listing a gambling app for PK users
    Apps are blocked and store availability is restricted.
    Sources
  • high
    Cross-border ML exposure post-grey-list
    Elevated AML posture after October 2022 exit; scrutiny remains.
    Sources
  • high
    Routing settlement through PK correspondent banks
    SBP forex rules prohibit gambling remittances.
    Sources
  • high
    Local director/manager of a facilitation entity
    Individuals face criminal liability under PGA and PECA.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming a state-lottery carve-out exists
    Pakistan has no state lottery; no carve-out from prohibition.
    Sources
  • medium
    Brand association with PK gambling
    High-profile court petitions and FATF sensitivity raise reputational exposure.
    Sources
  • medium
    Relying on the s.11 tourist-complex saving
    Marginal, foreigners-only derogation — not a commercial route.
    Sources
  • medium
    Encouraging VPN circumvention of blocks
    Circumvention does not legalise activity and adds exposure.
    Sources
  • medium
    Pending IHC ban petition
    An adverse directive could mandate broader payment/ad blocking.
    Sources
  • medium
    Marketing a 'skill' product to evade the ban
    Skill/chance line is applied through enforcement practice; risk is high.
    Sources
  • medium
    Broadcast or media tie-up with betting brand
    PEMRA directed not to contract with betting surrogates.
    Sources
  • medium
    Holding PK player data for gambling
    Data tied to unlawful activity compounds criminal exposure.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming light-touch enforcement
    Trajectory is toward payment-monitoring and platform accountability.
    Sources
  • low
    Assuming provincial divergence
    Provincial ordinances mirror the federal prohibition.
    Sources
  • low
    Treating National Prize Bonds as a gambling precedent
    Bonds are a contested savings security, not a gambling licence basis.
    Sources
  • critical
    Any gambling licence application
    No regulator or licence exists; activity is criminal.
    Sources
  • critical
    Reliance on a future legalisation pathway
    Article 37(g) and Islamic injunctions make liberalisation highly unlikely.
    Sources
  • critical
    Processing player funds via JazzCash/Easypaisa/SadaPay
    Mobile-money rails are flagged and treated as money laundering.
    Sources
  • critical
    Receiving gambling proceeds through PK banks
    AMLA 2010 designates gambling proceeds as proceeds of crime.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

An offshore sportsbook wishes to accept Pakistani players online.

All gambling is prohibited under the PGA 1977; the site is liable to PTA blocking under PECA 2016 and operators/facilitators face criminal and AML exposure.

Do this: Geo-block Pakistan entirely; do not onboard PK-resident players.

Sources

A PSP is asked to process gambling deposits via JazzCash/Easypaisa.

SBP rules prohibit gambling remittances and AMLA 2010 treats proceeds as criminal; disguised P2P transfers are an active enforcement focus.

Do this: Refuse; treat gambling MCCs and disguised transfers as prohibited.

Sources

A cricket team is offered a betting-brand jersey sponsorship.

The Peshawar High Court barred betting sponsorship of PSL teams; surrogate sponsorship violates the prohibition.

Do this: Decline all betting and surrogate-betting sponsorship.

Sources

A B2B platform vendor considers supplying software to an operator targeting PK.

No B2B licence pathway exists; supply facilitates unlawful gambling and risks facilitation liability.

Do this: Contractually exclude PK from the operator's permitted markets.

Sources

An influencer is paid to promote a betting app in Pakistan.

Advertising unregistered gambling is treated as a PECA offence; FIA has pursued such facilitation.

Do this: Avoid all PK betting promotion; reject affiliate deals scoped to PK.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Competitive landscape. no published estimate of illegal/unlicensed gambling market share exists; figure not estimated per family rules.
  • searched: Pakistan illegal gambling market size estimate
  • searched: Pakistan cricket betting market value
  • searched: Pakistan offshore betting turnover estimate
  • checked: fatf-gafi.org
Aml cft regime. FMU STR statistics for the gambling category not publicly published; reporting threshold not located.
  • searched: Pakistan FMU STR gambling statistics
  • searched: State Bank Pakistan AML reporting threshold gambling
  • searched: Financial Monitoring Unit Pakistan annual report gambling
  • checked: mofa.gov.pk

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.