Jurisdictions › Panama

Panama

National jurisdiction

Enter if you need a territorial-tax, regulated offshore-leaning hub and can secure banking and AML compliance.

15 open · 1 restricted · 1 closed · 1 uncertain · 2 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 28 Sep 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • CasinoModels agree
    Open
  • Poker
    Open
  • BingoModels agree
    Open
  • LotteryState monopoly · Contested
    Closed
    Varies by form · 1
    • Raffle tied to lnb draw: restricted
  • Sports bettingModels agree
    Open
  • Other event bettingModels agree
    Open
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports bettingModels agree
    Open
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool bettingModels agree
    Open
    Varies by form · 1
    • Horse racing tote: monopolised
  • Virtual event bettingModels agree
    Open
  • Fantasy sportsContested
    Open
  • Skill gamesContested
    Open
    Varies by form · 1
    • Pure skill: outside_perimeter
  • Prediction marketsGrey zone · Models agree
    Uncertain
  • SweepstakesModels agree
    Open
  • Free playOutside the regulatory perimeter · Models agree
    Open

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BModels agree
    Open
  • Affiliate marketingOutside the regulatory perimeter · Contested
    Open
  • Payments for gamblingModels agree
    Open

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gambling
    Restricted

Class-level certainty is graded for 16 of 20 classes.

Board briefing

Panama: a maturing, territorial-tax offshore-leaning licence hub — open but bank-access constrained.

What has changed

  • Panama exited the FATF grey list (Oct 2023) and the EU high-risk AML list (Mar 2024), with a hardened AML legislative stack and increased penalties under Law 254/2021. It remains on the EU non-cooperative tax jurisdiction list.

What to do now

  • Secure banking early, build a Law 23/2015-compliant AML program with a designated compliance officer, register software/RNG with the JCJ, and confirm host-market recognition before relying on the Panama licence cross-border.

What to watch

  • GAFILAT-driven AML refinements, any EU tax-list delisting, and JCJ fee/technical-standard updates.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Mixed

Panama's gambling market is undergoing its most significant structural change in years through Bill No. 403, reported approved by the National Assembly, advanced by deputies Raúl Pineda and Crispiano Adames, first reported around 24 March 2026 and reaffirmed 20-21 May 2026. The Junta de Control de J…

Full analysis · 133 words

Panama's gambling market is undergoing its most significant structural change in years through Bill No. 403, reported approved by the National Assembly, advanced by deputies Raúl Pineda and Crispiano Adames, first reported around 24 March 2026 and reaffirmed 20-21 May 2026. The Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ) gains real-time electronic transaction-monitoring authority over the entire gambling industry, moving the regime from periodic inspection to continuous supervision. This sits alongside a near-total advertising ban, payment-method restrictions, mandatory biometric player-protection tooling, and removal of the legacy 5.5% player-side winnings tax introduced in 2015. No T1 primary source from the JCJ or Gaceta Oficial was reachable, so the family of findings rests on corroborated T3/T4 press. The direction is toward a more professionalised, continuously supervised market rather than a contraction of the licensed estate itself.

  • Post-FATF debanking risk
  • Limited global recognition
  • EU non-cooperative tax listing
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Mixed

Bill No. 403 is reported to empower the Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ) with real-time electronic transaction-monitoring authority over the entire gambling industry, replacing periodic inspection with continuous oversight. Five corroborating trade-press accounts, including Newsroom Panama's reporti…

Full analysis · 133 words

Bill No. 403 is reported to empower the Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ) with real-time electronic transaction-monitoring authority over the entire gambling industry, replacing periodic inspection with continuous oversight. Five corroborating trade-press accounts, including Newsroom Panama's reporting on the Assembly's approval and reaffirmation of the bill, describe the JCJ receiving modern technological tools to monitor gambling operations as they occur rather than at scheduled review points. This is reported as an industry-wide authority rather than one confined to a single vertical, meaning the compliance obligation would extend across the licensed estate. No primary JCJ or Gaceta Oficial text was retrieved to confirm the bill's final in-force wording or the precise scope of the monitoring mandate, so the finding is corroborated across secondary sources but not yet checked against the enacted instrument itself.

03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Mixed

Entry requires a Panamanian entity, a JCJ Administration/Operation Contract, technical audit/software registration, and financial guarantees, with a realistic 6–12 month timeline (advisory sources cite 2–8 months processing). Panama's corporate-services ecosystem is strong, but the banking relations…

Full analysis · 48 words

Entry requires a Panamanian entity, a JCJ Administration/Operation Contract, technical audit/software registration, and financial guarantees, with a realistic 6–12 month timeline (advisory sources cite 2–8 months processing). Panama's corporate-services ecosystem is strong, but the banking relationship — given post-FATF debanking pressure — is the primary practical entry risk.

04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Mixed

Advisory sources report a one-time state fee of approximately USD 40,000 on licence approval (cited under Cabinet Decree No. 462), an annual renewal fee of approximately USD 20,000, and a non-refundable investigation fee of USD 5,000–10,000 at submission. Mandatory financial guarantees apply. These …

Full analysis · 60 words

Advisory sources report a one-time state fee of approximately USD 40,000 on licence approval (cited under Cabinet Decree No. 462), an annual renewal fee of approximately USD 20,000, and a non-refundable investigation fee of USD 5,000–10,000 at submission. Mandatory financial guarantees apply. These are moderate relative to major jurisdictions; exact figures rest on T2 advisory sources pending JCJ primary confirmation.

05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Panama taxes gambling on a GGR basis; advisory sources report 10% of GGR payable monthly for operations within Panama, due within the first 10 days of the following month. Panama's territorial tax system means income from non-Panama-resident players is generally outside Panama-source taxation — oper…

Full analysis · 64 words

Panama taxes gambling on a GGR basis; advisory sources report 10% of GGR payable monthly for operations within Panama, due within the first 10 days of the following month. Panama's territorial tax system means income from non-Panama-resident players is generally outside Panama-source taxation — operators serving only foreign players can operate at very low effective tax. Online services to non-residents are exempt from ITBMS/VAT.

06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Mixed

Panama's dollarised economy and sophisticated banking sector (Banco General, BAC Credomatic, Banistmo, Global Bank) support card, bank-transfer and e-wallet rails, with Yappy dominant in mobile payments. SBP regulates banks and PSPs. Post-FATF, correspondent banks scrutinise Panama transactions more…

Full analysis · 50 words

Panama's dollarised economy and sophisticated banking sector (Banco General, BAC Credomatic, Banistmo, Global Bank) support card, bank-transfer and e-wallet rails, with Yappy dominant in mobile payments. SBP regulates banks and PSPs. Post-FATF, correspondent banks scrutinise Panama transactions more closely and debanking of new gambling operators remains an elevated, documented risk.

07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Favourable

Panama imposes limited marketing restrictions. Licensed operators may advertise across web, apps, social and search. Responsible-gambling messaging is mandated by JCJ resolutions (e.g. MEF-RES-2021-1968 and MEF-RES-2022-2900 approving 'Jugar Responsablemente también es parte del Juego' material and …

Full analysis · 63 words

Panama imposes limited marketing restrictions. Licensed operators may advertise across web, apps, social and search. Responsible-gambling messaging is mandated by JCJ resolutions (e.g. MEF-RES-2021-1968 and MEF-RES-2022-2900 approving 'Jugar Responsablemente también es parte del Juego' material and self-exclusion procedures). Affiliate marketing is common and unrestricted by the JCJ; the principal residual risk arises from host-market advertising rules where Panama licences are not locally recognised.

08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Mixed

Two technical-compliance developments attach to Bill No. 403. First, the Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ) gains expanded real-time technological monitoring powers over the gambling industry once the bill takes effect, moving supervision away from periodic reporting toward continuous, technology-enab…

Full analysis · 131 words

Two technical-compliance developments attach to Bill No. 403. First, the Junta de Control de Juegos (JCJ) gains expanded real-time technological monitoring powers over the gambling industry once the bill takes effect, moving supervision away from periodic reporting toward continuous, technology-enabled oversight of licensed operators. Second, the bill mandates biometric identity verification for online gambling platforms, a requirement that will oblige operators to integrate new identity-verification technology ahead of the bill's effective date. Both requirements are tied to the same enacted-not-yet-effective legislative vehicle and therefore carry mixed durability and Probable confidence: they were passed by the National Assembly but awaited presidential signature as of the most recent, end-July 2026 reporting. Operators should treat both the monitoring-powers expansion and the biometric mandate as probable near-term technical-compliance obligations rather than confirmed, currently binding ones.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Favourable

Bill No. 403 would impose a near-total ban on gambling advertising once signed into law, covering television, radio, print, social media, and sports sponsorship, and expressly prohibiting influencer-driven promotion. This is a sweeping restriction relative to the advertising latitude operators curre…

Full analysis · 102 words

Bill No. 403 would impose a near-total ban on gambling advertising once signed into law, covering television, radio, print, social media, and sports sponsorship, and expressly prohibiting influencer-driven promotion. This is a sweeping restriction relative to the advertising latitude operators currently have, and it is pending presidential signature rather than yet in force. The durability of the eventual restriction is mixed: the enabling prohibition would be statutory and durable, while implementing detail on enforcement mechanics would likely arrive as more fragile secondary guidance. Confidence in the provision's substance is probable, based on secondary press and industry reporting rather than confirmed statutory text.

10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

Press reporting on Bill No. 403 describes an expanded JCJ enforcement toolkit: fines of up to 10% of an operator's revenue, licence suspension, and criminal proceedings against executives or operators in serious cases, reported by CasinoReviews.net as the sanction structure attached to the reform pa…

Full analysis · 171 words

Press reporting on Bill No. 403 describes an expanded JCJ enforcement toolkit: fines of up to 10% of an operator's revenue, licence suspension, and criminal proceedings against executives or operators in serious cases, reported by CasinoReviews.net as the sanction structure attached to the reform package. A separate and more thinly sourced claim describes JCJ authority to order telecom providers to block unlicensed gambling sites, apps and IP addresses, with telecom non-compliance fines reportedly reaching one million Balboas; this rests on a single vendor-adjacent Newsroom Panama source and has not been corroborated against an independent account. Read against the statutory-licensing-stack pattern typical of civil-law gambling regimes, unlicensed operation is likely to sit as an offence under the enabling instrument itself, with blocking orders functioning as a secondary enforcement vector. The reported shift to real-time transaction monitoring compounds enforcement exposure structurally, since continuous visibility into transaction data positions the regulator to detect and act on breaches faster than periodic inspection allowed. No primary instrument confirms either the sanctions ceiling or the blocking-order mechanism.

ProbableAI-generated11 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Mixed

Panama has consolidated as a legitimate LatAm-facing licensing hub. Post-FATF delisting (October 2023) and EU AML delisting (March 2024), the trajectory is moderate AML/KYC tightening. The AML legislative stack (Laws 70/116/123 of 2019; 124/129 of 2020; 254 of 2021; Executive Decrees 905/2019, 721/2…

Full analysis · 55 words

Panama has consolidated as a legitimate LatAm-facing licensing hub. Post-FATF delisting (October 2023) and EU AML delisting (March 2024), the trajectory is moderate AML/KYC tightening. The AML legislative stack (Laws 70/116/123 of 2019; 124/129 of 2020; 254 of 2021; Executive Decrees 905/2019, 721/2020, 13/15/35 of 2022) is in force. Market remains open to private operators.

Evidential record & source register 1 enforcement · 26 red flags · 12 sources · Expand full record

Enforcement record

What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 1 recorded event.

  1. 27 Oct 2023
    FATF · Republic of Panama (AML regime)
    Confirmed
    Sources

What gets operators fined

26 red flags (8 high, 15 medium, 3 low) and 4 controls that address them.

  • high
    New gambling operator seeks bank account
    Post-FATF debanking of gambling operators is a documented elevated risk.
    Sources
  • high
    Serving markets where Panama licence not recognised
    Legal from Panama's view but exposes operator to host-jurisdiction enforcement.
    Sources
  • high
    Weak AML/KYC program
    Law 254/2021 raises penalties up to 5m balboas; UAF active.
    Sources
  • high
    Uncertified RNG/software deployed
    JCJ mandates third-party certification; deployment without it breaches registration.
    Sources
  • high
    Failure to maintain local presence
    Panamanian entity/local representative required; lapse jeopardises licence.
    Sources
  • high
    No designated compliance officer
    Mandatory under Law 23 of 2015.
    Sources
  • high
    Beneficial ownership not filed
    RUBF under Law 129/2020 requires UBO registration.
    Sources
  • high
    Allowing under-18 play
    Minimum gambling age 18 with verification required.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming a B2B licence exists
    No standalone B2B pathway; suppliers must rely on operator certification.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming all revenue is tax-free
    10% GGR tax applies to operations within Panama; only foreign-sourced revenue benefits from territorial exemption.
    Sources
  • medium
    EU non-cooperative tax listing
    Limits Panama hub credibility with EU-facing counterparties.
    Sources
  • medium
    Ignoring Ley 81/2019 obligations
    APDATOS supervises data protection; non-compliance risks sanction.
    Sources
  • medium
    Missing monthly JCJ reports
    Monthly GGR/player reports are mandatory; non-filing risks sanction.
    Sources
  • medium
    Late licence renewal
    Renewal application due 2-3 months pre-expiry; delay risks operational interruption.
    Sources
  • medium
    Crypto-funded gambling without JCJ guidance
    No specific JCJ crypto-gambling framework; treatment unclear.
    Sources
  • medium
    MCC 7995 card processing assumptions
    Correspondent-banking scrutiny may disrupt card rails.
    Sources
  • medium
    Inadequate director composition
    Advisory sources cite minimum three directors; fit-and-proper scrutiny applies.
    Sources
  • medium
    Advertising in unlicensed host markets
    Host-market advertising rules apply regardless of JCJ permissiveness.
    Sources
  • medium
    Ignoring self-exclusion register
    JCJ self-exclusion is mandatory; honouring it is a licence obligation.
    Sources
  • medium
    Late monthly GGR tax payment
    Due within first 10 days of following month.
    Sources
  • medium
    Assuming open lottery access
    State lottery prominent; private lottery restricted.
    Sources
  • medium
    Failing JCJ technical audit
    Equipment/software subject to regulatory review.
    Sources
  • medium
    Incomplete transaction history
    Complete account history must be available to the government on request.
    Sources
  • low
    Relying on outdated fee figures
    Fee figures from advisory sources may diverge from current JCJ schedule.
    Sources
  • low
    Overstating licence prestige
    Licence weightier than Curaçao but below MGA; recognition limited.
    Sources
  • low
    Ignoring foreign-currency exchange policy requirement
    Online operators required to maintain an FX policy.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    AML/KYC program with designated compliance officer
    Implement Law 23/2015-compliant CDD, SAR filing, UBO registration and transaction monitoring.
    Sources
  • 002
    Third-party RNG/software certification
    Obtain GLI/BMM/eCOGRA certification and register all software/equipment with JCJ.
    Sources
  • 003
    Banking-relationship resilience plan
    Engage multiple banks/PSPs early and document source-of-funds to mitigate debanking.
    Sources
  • 004
    Host-market recognition mapping
    Document host-jurisdiction recognition before serving cross-border with the Panama licence.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

EU-facing operator seeks Panama licence as offshore hub.

Panama licence is legal from Panama's view but limited recognition and EU tax listing constrain credibility; host-market rules govern advertising/operation.

Do this: Use Panama only where host markets recognise or tolerate it; map recognition first.

Sources

Operator serving only foreign players assesses tax.

Territorial system generally excludes foreign-sourced revenue; 10% GGR applies to Panama-resident operations.

Do this: Segregate Panama-resident revenue and document territorial sourcing.

Sources

Software supplier wants to enter Panama.

No standalone B2B licence; supply via operator certification/registration.

Do this: Partner with a JCJ-licensed operator and complete software registration.

Sources

New operator cannot open a bank account.

Post-FATF debanking risk is elevated for gambling operators.

Do this: Engage multiple banks early; prepare robust AML/SOF documentation.

Sources

Operator deploys uncertified RNG.

JCJ requires third-party RNG certification and registration; deployment without it breaches conditions.

Do this: Certify with GLI/BMM/eCOGRA before launch.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Fees. exact current JCJ fee schedule not confirmed from primary JCJ T1 source; figures rest on T2 advisory firms.
  • searched: JCJ Panama licence fee schedule official
  • searched: jcj.gob.pa tarifa licencia juegos en linea
  • searched: Cabinet Decree 462 Panama gambling fee
  • checked: mef.gob.pa
Aml cft regime. exact UAF cash/transaction reporting threshold (USD) not confirmed from primary T1 source.
  • searched: UAF Panama umbral reporte operaciones sospechosas
  • searched: Panama AML reporting threshold gambling operators
  • searched: uaf.gob.pa threshold STR gambling
  • checked: uaf.gob.pa
Competitive landscape. no published JCJ licensed online operator count or unlicensed market-share figure retrieved.
  • searched: Panama JCJ licensed online operator count
  • searched: Panama online gambling market size GGR
  • searched: JCJ operadores en linea lista 2026
  • checked: mef.gob.pa

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

JCJ legal basis is Decreto Ley N°2 of 1998.

PA-CLAIM-001 · T1 of 4 · published 7 Jun 2026 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources

Gambling tax is 10% of GGR for operations within Panama.

PA-CLAIM-002 · T3 of 4 (asserted T2, shown at its source's tier) · published 13 Apr 2026 · Probable
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources