Jurisdictions › Guernsey

Guernsey Online Gambling Regulation, Licensing & Tax Regime

Federal layer

Guernsey's gambling market is defined by a hard legal division between two regimes.

5 open · 1 restricted · 14 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 3 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare
Regulatory DimensionGuernsey Standing Position
JurisdictionGuernsey (GG)
Primary Gambling RegulatorSee Licensing & Regulation section
Product Access Summary5 open · 1 restricted · 14 not yet assessed
Permitted (Open) VerticalsCasino, Poker, Bingo, Sports betting, Software / B2B
Restricted / Monopoly VerticalsLottery
Primary Instruments ReferencedGG-GOV-GAMBLING-PAGE; AGCC-FAQ; GOVGG-BOOKMAKERS-POLICY-PDF
Verification & CurrencyAI research, not expert reviewed · Published 25 Oct 2026 (collected 25 Oct 2026)

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • Casino
    Open
  • Poker
    Open
  • Bingo
    Open
  • Lottery
    Restricted
  • Sports betting
    Open
  • Other event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sports
    Not yet assessed
  • Skill games
    Not yet assessed
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • Sweepstakes
    Not yet assessed
  • Free play
    Not yet assessed

Supply roles

  • Software / B2B
    Open
  • Affiliate marketing
    Not yet assessed
  • Payments for gambling
    Not yet assessed

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gambling
    Not yet assessed

No class-level certainty grade is recorded for this jurisdiction yet; confidence is carried per section below.

Board briefing

Guernsey proper offers no online gambling licence; the Bailiwick's eGambling hub is a distinct regime (AGCC/Alderney) with a 0%-tax profile and a historically decisive enforcement posture.

What has changed

  • This is a baseline-discovery run; no prior baseline exists for comparison. The most recent concrete development identified is a 2024 Amendment Ordinance adding Schedule 5 information-gathering powers to the AGCC's regulatory toolkit.

What to do now

  • Any counterparty or entry-planning diligence referencing a 'Guernsey' gambling licence must be re-scoped to confirm whether the Alderney/AGCC regime (for online) or the Guernsey-proper Committee for Home Affairs regime (for land-based) is actually in scope.

What to watch

  • Primary-source confirmation of current AGCC fee schedules, AML/CFT obligations, and any enforcement action within the current 18-month window — all flagged as coverage gaps this cycle.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Guernsey Gambling — Overview

Mixed

Guernsey's gambling market is defined by a hard legal division between two regimes. Guernsey proper operates a land-based-only framework under the Gambling (Guernsey) Law, 1971, with no remote or online gambling pathway provided under that statute. Online eGambling conducted from the Bailiwick is li…

Full analysis · 126 words

Guernsey's gambling market is defined by a hard legal division between two regimes. Guernsey proper operates a land-based-only framework under the Gambling (Guernsey) Law, 1971, with no remote or online gambling pathway provided under that statute. Online eGambling conducted from the Bailiwick is licensed exclusively through a separate regulator, the Alderney Gambling Control Commission, operating under the Gambling (Alderney) Law 1999 and the Alderney eGambling Ordinance 2009. Commercial marketing materials frequently describe online licences as a 'Guernsey licence', though the operative regulator and legislation in every such case is Alderney's, not Guernsey proper's. For market-entry purposes the two regimes should be read as structurally and legally distinct rather than as a single jurisdiction-wide gambling framework, with the Alderney/AGCC regime carrying the entirety of the remote-gambling opportunity.

  • Guernsey proper has no standalone remote-gaming regime; operators seeking online licensing must route through the separate Alderney (AGCC) regime
Probable · AI-generated · Read full analysis & tables →
Mixed

Guernsey's licensing architecture rests on two separate statutory bases. Guernsey proper licenses bookmakers and betting offices under the Gambling (Betting) Ordinance, 1973, made under the Gambling (Guernsey) Law, 1971. The Alderney regime is built on the Gambling (Alderney) Law 1999 and the Aldern…

Full analysis · 154 words

Guernsey's licensing architecture rests on two separate statutory bases. Guernsey proper licenses bookmakers and betting offices under the Gambling (Betting) Ordinance, 1973, made under the Gambling (Guernsey) Law, 1971. The Alderney regime is built on the Gambling (Alderney) Law 1999 and the Alderney eGambling Ordinance 2009, with the Alderney Gambling Control Commission as the exclusive regulator for remote eGambling conducted from the Bailiwick. Two licence types anchor entry to that regime: the Category 1 licence, covering business-to-consumer operation including all aspects of player management, and the Category 2 licence, covering business-to-business software and platform supply to the online sector. Both licence types are operational as live authorisation routes. The land-based and online frameworks are administered separately, by the Committee for Home Affairs and the AGCC respectively, and an applicant should expect to engage the correct regulator for the product it intends to offer rather than assume a single licensing contact point covers both regimes.

Probable · AI-generated · Read full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Guernsey Gambling — Enforcement

Mixed

AGCC's enforcement record shows a regulator prepared to use its strongest powers once an operator's financial integrity or ownership basis is called into question. On 29 September 2011, the AGCC revoked the licences held by the three entities trading as Full Tilt Poker — Vantage Limited, Filco Limit…

Full analysis · 165 words

AGCC's enforcement record shows a regulator prepared to use its strongest powers once an operator's financial integrity or ownership basis is called into question. On 29 September 2011, the AGCC revoked the licences held by the three entities trading as Full Tilt Poker — Vantage Limited, Filco Limited and Oxalic Limited — citing serious breaches including false reporting and the unauthorised provision of credit to players. On 11 September 2013, the AGCC suspended the licence of Bubble Group BV, trading as Sheriff Gaming, pending investigation into the basis on which the group and its sponsors had originally been approved. Commentary describes the Commission's enforcement approach as graduated: a rectification proposal, then a written caution if unresolved, then a hearing or fine, then suspension, then revocation. The Alderney eGambling Ordinance 2009 was amended in 2024 to add Schedule 5 information-gathering powers, broadening the basis on which the AGCC can compel information from licensees. No enforcement action beyond the two historical cases appears in the public record.

Probable · AI-generated · 3 enforcement events · Read full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 2 red flags · 14 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

2 red flags (1 high, 1 medium) and 0 controls that address them.

  • high
    Historical precedent of licence revocation following misrepresentation of financial integrity to the regulator (Full Tilt Poker, 2011)
    Demonstrates that AGCC will revoke licences decisively where an operator misleads the Commission about liquid funds or operational integrity, a materially relevant precedent for counterparty financial-diligence questions.
    Sources
  • medium
    Marketing material referring to a 'Guernsey gambling licence' for online/remote products
    Guernsey proper has no standalone online-gaming regime; such marketing almost always actually refers to the distinct Alderney/AGCC licence, creating counterparty due-diligence risk if the distinction is not understood.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

A B2B software platform supplier wishes to incorporate in the Bailiwick and supply games to AGCC Category 1 licensees.

The supplier should apply for an AGCC Category 2 (B2B) licence as a Bailiwick-incorporated company, subject to AGCC probity, financial-stability and source-of-funds review.

Do this: Engage Bailiwick corporate-services and AGCC-specialist counsel before incorporation to ensure the Internal Control System pack meets AGCC expectations.

Sources

An operator markets a 'Guernsey gambling licence' for an online casino product.

No such standalone online licence exists under Guernsey-proper law; the operator necessarily holds (or should hold) an AGCC licence issued under Alderney legislation.

Do this: Request the specific AGCC licence number and category from the operator and verify directly against the AGCC's own public register rather than relying on marketing claims.

Sources

A land-based bookmaker wishes to open a betting office in Guernsey (the island) only, with no online component.

This falls under the Gambling (Betting) Ordinance, 1973, made under the Gambling (Guernsey) Law, 1971, and is licensed by the Committee for Home Affairs — entirely separate from the AGCC regime.

Do this: Apply directly to the Committee for Home Affairs; no AGCC engagement is required for a purely retail, Guernsey-island-only operation.

Sources

An AGCC Category 1 licensee is found to have misreported its liquid funds position to the Commission.

Historical precedent (Full Tilt Poker, 2011) shows the AGCC will revoke licences decisively, with immediate effect, where it finds it has been fundamentally misled about an operator's financial integrity.

Do this: Maintain scrupulously accurate real-time funds reporting; treat any material-event reporting obligation as a bright-line compliance priority.

Sources

A foreign-incorporated operator does not wish to establish a Bailiwick company but wants to use the Alderney licensing framework.

The AGCC Associate Certificate route allows a foreign-based company to operate in association with the AGCC framework without incorporating locally, subject to AGCC-standard probity review of the foreign entity and its sponsors.

Do this: Budget for ongoing sponsor/associate-certificate compliance obligations, which carried enforcement exposure in the 2013 Bubble Group/Sheriff Gaming suspension.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Aml cft regime. no FATF/MONEYVAL mutual evaluation report, statutory reporting threshold, or designated-reporting-entity confirmation located for Guernsey/Alderney gambling operators.
  • searched: Guernsey AML CFT gambling MONEYVAL report
  • searched: Alderney Gambling Control Commission AML reporting threshold
  • searched: Guernsey Criminal Justice Proceeds of Crime gambling designated business
  • checked: gov.gg
Player protection. no self-exclusion scheme name, deposit-limit regime, reality-check requirement, or age-verification standard located for either the Guernsey land-based regime or the AGCC online regime.
  • searched: Guernsey gambling self-exclusion scheme
  • searched: AGCC responsible gambling deposit limits
  • searched: Alderney eGambling player protection age verification
  • checked: alderneygambling.com
Technical compliance. no named approved test laboratory, RNG certification standard, or game-approval process could be sourced beyond a generic reference to 'RNG documentation' in the AGCC application pack.
  • searched: AGCC approved test laboratory RNG certification
  • searched: Alderney eGambling technical standards
  • searched: AGCC game approval process online casino
  • checked: vantegris.com
Data protection. no gambling-specific data protection rule, supervisory authority citation, or KYC retention period located.
  • searched: Guernsey data protection gambling supervisory authority ODPA
  • searched: Alderney eGambling data protection KYC retention
  • searched: Guernsey Data Protection Bailiwick Law 2017 gambling
  • checked: gov.gg
Consumer protection. no general consumer-law framework, ADR body, or complaint-escalation path located specific to gambling in Guernsey/Alderney.
  • searched: Guernsey consumer protection gambling ADR
  • searched: Alderney Gambling Control Commission player complaints
  • searched: Bailiwick of Guernsey unfair contract terms gambling
  • checked: alderneygambling.com
Payments and money flow. no permitted funding method list, withdrawal-timeframe obligation, or capital-control data located.
  • searched: AGCC payment processing requirements operators
  • searched: Alderney eGambling withdrawal timeframe rules
  • searched: Guernsey gambling payment processor banking
  • checked: legarithm.io
Competitive landscape. only a third-party (non-regulator) licence-count tracker was located; no T1/T2 operator count, market concentration, or unlicensed-share estimate found.
  • searched: AGCC licensed operator register count
  • searched: Alderney gambling market concentration operators
  • searched: Guernsey unlicensed gambling market share
  • checked: gamblinglicenseregister.com
Extraterritorial reach. no FATF typology citation, MLAT activity data, or payment-rail/card-scheme disruption evidence located specific to GG/Alderney.
  • searched: Alderney gambling FATF typology advisory
  • searched: AGCC regulator cooperation MLAT
  • searched: Guernsey gambling payment blocking foreign jurisdiction
  • checked: en.wikipedia.org
Market opportunity. no GGR estimate, market-size figure, or growth-trajectory data published or located for the Guernsey/Alderney gambling sector.
  • searched: Alderney eGambling market size GGR
  • searched: Guernsey gambling industry revenue statistics
  • searched: AGCC annual report market data
  • checked: en.wikipedia.org

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.