Enforcement record
What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 1 recorded event.
8 Dec 2025
Banque Centrale des Comores · Entities claiming unrecognised financial/institutional status linked to the Union of the Comoros, including Anjouan-based claimant bodies
Confirmed
Sources Available to subscribers
What gets operators fined
5 red flags (3 high, 1 medium) and 3 controls that address them.
- high
Payment processor or bank onboarding a counterparty citing a KM-A gaming licence as compliance basis
No designated national reporting-entity regime for gambling exists in practice; GIABA MER flags weak DNFBP supervision nationally.
Sources Available to subscribers - high
Counterparty relies on a claimant domain as proof of good standing
Claimant domains are excluded from T1/T2 tiering; no official Anjouan gaming instrument text has been located despite repeated search.
Sources Available to subscribers - high
Use of Anjouan-registered entities for payment rails
Historical pattern of BCC legal action and international rogatory commissions against Anjouan offshore financial entities signals elevated correspondent-banking and sanctions-screening risk.
Sources Available to subscribers - medium
Player disputes arising from an operator licensed only by the unrecognised Anjouan bodies
No national ADR, regulator, or enforcement body exists to hear player complaints against a Comoros-nexus operator; redress is effectively unavailable.
Sources Available to subscribers - critical
Operator or supplier claims to hold an 'Anjouan' gaming licence from the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority or 'Anjouan Gaming' board
The Union of the Comoros' central bank states these bodies are not recognised and have no authority to issue licences; treating the claim as a credential exposes counterparties to misrepresentation and AML/reputational liability.
Sources Available to subscribers
Controls
- 001
Licence-claim verification protocol
Verify any 'Anjouan' gaming licence claim against the BCC's published disavowal communique before onboarding.
Sources Available to subscribers - 002
Correspondent-banking enhanced due diligence trigger
Apply enhanced due diligence to any payment rail touching an Anjouan-registered corporate or financial services agent.
Sources Available to subscribers - 003
DNFBP-gap compensating control
Given unimplemented national DNFBP supervision of casinos/gambling, apply the counterparty's home/host regulator AML programme as the controlling framework rather than relying on any Comoros-nexus registration.
Sources Available to subscribers
Worked scenarios
5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.
A PSP is asked to onboard an online casino operator presenting an 'Anjouan Gaming' licence citing the Betting and Gaming Act 2005.
The BCC's 8 December 2025 communique states that such bodies are not recognised in the Union of the Comoros and have no authority to issue licences; no online gaming licence has been issued nationally.
Do this: Decline to treat the licence as a valid regulatory credential; apply unlicensed/high-risk onboarding controls or decline the relationship.
Sources Available to subscribersA law firm is asked whether a B2B software supplier can lawfully supply platform technology to an 'Anjouan'-licensed operator.
No statutory B2B licensing pathway exists in the Union of the Comoros; gambling is prohibited nationally per GIABA MER (May 2024).
Do this: Advise the client that no lawful B2B licensing pathway exists and that supply would carry AML/reputational exposure.
Sources Available to subscribersAn affiliate marketer is asked to promote an operator's 'Anjouan licence' as a trust signal.
GIABA MER confirms national gambling prohibition; BCC communique confirms the claimed licensor has no authority to issue licences.
Do this: Do not represent the licence as a lawful credential; flag as a false-credential-marketing red flag.
Sources Available to subscribersA compliance team is screening a corporate structure that lists an Anjouan-registered 'Corporate Services' agent as registered agent for an online gambling brand.
Historical pattern of BCC action against offshore corporate/financial service providers on Anjouan, including court actions and an international rogatory commission.
Do this: Treat as elevated correspondent-banking/sanctions-screening risk and escalate for enhanced due diligence.
Sources Available to subscribersA player disputes a withheld withdrawal from an operator claiming an Anjouan gaming licence and seeks regulatory recourse.
No national gambling regulator or ADR body exists; GIABA MER confirms gambling is prohibited nationally, meaning no state apparatus oversees such disputes.
Do this: Advise the player that no national redress mechanism exists and that the operator's claimed licence carries no recognised regulatory backing.
Sources Available to subscribersWhat we looked for and could not find
Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.
Market opportunity. no credible market-size or GGR estimate published for the KM-A claimant online-gaming scheme.
- searched: Anjouan online gambling market size estimate
- searched: Comoros gambling GGR estimate
- searched: offshore Anjouan gaming revenue report
- checked: fatf-gafi.org
Competitive landscape. no published count of operators claiming an Anjouan gaming licence, nor market-concentration data.
- searched: Anjouan Gaming licensees list
- searched: Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority licence register
- searched: number of Anjouan gaming licensees
- checked: banque-comores.km
Cost to operate. no statutory fee schedule or tax basis exists for a prohibited activity; no Betting and Gaming Act 2005 text was located.
- searched: Anjouan gaming licence fee schedule
- searched: Anjouan Betting and Gaming Act 2005 text
- searched: Comoros gambling tax law
- checked: banque-comores.km
Operational obligations. no reporting, certification, or RG-operational regime identified.
- searched: Anjouan gaming regulator reporting obligations
- searched: Anjouan Gaming board compliance requirements
- searched: Comoros gambling operator reporting law
- checked: banque-comores.km
Player protection. no self-exclusion, deposit-limit, reality-check, or age-verification regime identified.
- searched: Anjouan self-exclusion register gambling
- searched: Comoros gambling age verification law
- searched: Anjouan Gaming responsible gambling rules
- checked: banque-comores.km
Technical compliance. no technical standards body, test lab, or RNG certification regime identified; no evidence of gambling-specific ISP/DNS interdiction.
- searched: Anjouan Gaming technical standards RNG testing
- searched: Comoros gambling ISP blocking
- searched: Anjouan gaming board approved test lab
- checked: banque-comores.km
Distribution platform rules. no app-store or ad-platform policy specific to KM-A claimant gaming brands located.
- searched: Anjouan gambling app store policy
- searched: Google Play Anjouan gaming apps restriction
- searched: Anjouan gaming affiliate rules
- checked: banque-comores.km
Data protection. no dedicated Comorian data-protection statute or supervisory authority identified.
- searched: Comoros data protection law
- searched: Union of Comoros personal data law 2024
- searched: Anjouan data protection authority
- checked: banque-comores.km
Consumer protection. no gambling-specific consumer-law framework, ADR body, or complaint-escalation path identified.
- searched: Comoros consumer protection law gambling
- searched: Anjouan gaming dispute resolution
- searched: Comoros consumer regulator gambling complaints
- checked: banque-comores.km
Aml cft regime. reporting threshold and practical implementation of the DNFBP designation for casinos/gambling remain unclear beyond the GIABA MER's general finding of non-implementation.
- searched: Comoros Law 12-008 AML DNFBP threshold
- searched: Comoros FIU gambling reporting threshold
- searched: GIABA Comoros casino supervision
- checked: fatf-gafi.org
Source register
Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.
Full evidence is available to subscribers — every source, claim and date.
Subscribe → · Sign in