Jurisdictions › Malta

Malta

National jurisdiction

Enter via MGA licence for EU-grade brand value, but actively manage Article 56A cross-border litigation risk.

10 open · 1 restricted · 1 closed · 1 uncertain · 7 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Regulator: MGA · Collected 25 Oct 2026 · Published 25 Oct 2026 · Changed 25 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • Casino
    Open
  • Poker
    Open
  • Bingo
    Open
  • LotteryState monopoly
    Closed
  • Sports betting
    Open
  • Other event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports betting
    Open
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sports
    Open
  • Skill games
    Open
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • SweepstakesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Free play
    Not yet assessed

Supply roles

  • Software / B2B
    Open
  • Affiliate marketing
    Open
  • Payments for gambling
    Open

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gambling
    Restricted

No class-level certainty grade is recorded for this jurisdiction yet; confidence is carried per section below.

Board briefing

Malta remains the EU's premier iGaming hub, but Article 56A (Bill 55) and the EU infringement procedure now overhang the cross-border value of an MGA licence.

What has changed

  • The EC launched infringement procedure INFR(2025)2100 in June 2025 over Article 56A, and AG Emiliou's October 2025 opinion in C-198/24 signals EAPO asset-freeze exposure. The MGA also issued a 2025 Capital Requirements Policy requiring positive equity.

What to do now

  • Proceed with MGA licensing for EU-passportable activity but ring-fence exposure to AT/DE player-loss litigation, model capital-soundness compliance, and monitor the CJEU track on Article 56A.

What to watch

  • CJEU referral/ruling on Article 56A; any amendment or repeal; MGA fee and capital policy updates.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Favourable

The Malta picture is defined by two cross-regulatory developments rather than any change to the core gambling-licensing framework. On 23 October 2026, the Malta Gaming Authority and the Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority signed a Memorandum of Understanding to enhance cooperation on pl…

Full analysis · 145 words

The Malta picture is defined by two cross-regulatory developments rather than any change to the core gambling-licensing framework. On 23 October 2026, the Malta Gaming Authority and the Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority signed a Memorandum of Understanding to enhance cooperation on player-protection matters, signalling closer inter-agency coordination going forward. Separately, on 19 October 2026, the Malta Financial Services Authority issued a circular addressing how prediction markets and event contracts should be classified, stating that such products may fall under MiFID II, MiCA, or the Gaming Act depending on their structure and the operator's activities. Neither development changes the underlying licensing statute. Secondary-source data cited by SiGMA and attributed to EY also points to a continuing decline in the number of Malta gaming licences and licensed companies between 2022 and 2025, a market-structure signal that sits alongside, rather than inside, the two regulatory developments.

  • Article 56A / Bill 55 EU infringement risk to cross-border MGA licence value
  • Rising AT/DE player-loss recovery litigation
  • 2025 Capital Requirements Policy raising financial-soundness bar
Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

Malta's gaming tax regime was restructured effective 1 October 2026 under Legal Notice 84 of 2026, which amends the Gaming Tax Regulations (Subsidiary Legislation 583.10) to move from a flat 5% rate to a tiered structure differentiated by activity class, and expands the nexus test governing when Maltese gaming tax attaches to a player relationship beyond physical presence alone to establishment, permanent address, or habitual or physical presence in Malta. The Studio Broadcasting Levy for critical-gaming-supply licensees was raised from €500 to €3,000 per annum in the same instrument. No licensing, enforcement, or technical-compliance instrument change was identified: the Malta Gaming Authority's most recent public enforcement action remains the Condor Malta Limited suspension effective 16 September 2026, and Directive 3 of 2018's game-notification regime continues unchanged. The tax and nexus-test reform is the dominant feature of the picture for Malta.

ConfirmedNot reviewed1 post-review update · Not reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Favourable

Standard licences run 10 years. The licensing framework operates on an open-access basis with no numerus clausus for MGA gaming licences. The National Lottery is subject to a separate exclusive concession. The Gaming Act, Chapter 583, received assent and partial commencement on 1 August 2018 for p…

Full analysis · 1787 words

Standard licences run 10 years. The licensing framework operates on an open-access basis with no numerus clausus for MGA gaming licences. The National Lottery is subject to a separate exclusive concession. The Gaming Act, Chapter 583, received assent and partial commencement on 1 August 2018 for preliminary/administrative provisions, but the operative licensing regime (the substantive licence categories and conditions) came into force on 1 January 2019 under Legal Notice 226 of 2018 — this phased commencement corrects an earlier single-date characterisation. The MGA issues a single licence framework, under which licences are classified by activity as either a Gaming Service Licence (B2C) or Critical Gaming Supply Licence (B2B). Multiple game types may be offered under the same licence, subject to the relevant approvals. Four service types are recognised: Type 1 (casino/RNG), Type 2 (fixed-odds betting), Type 3 (peer-to-peer/poker/exchange), Type 4 (controlled skill games). By way of further explanation: Type 1 games – games of chance played against the house, the outcome of which is determined by a random generator, and shall include casino type games, including roulette, blackjack, baccarat, poker played against the house, lotteries secondary lotteries and virtual sports games; Type 2 games – games of chance played against the house, the outcome of which is not generated randomly, but is determined by the result of an event or competition extraneous to a game of chance, and whereby the operator manages his or her own risk by managing the odds offered to the player; Type 3 games – games of chance not played against the house and wherein the operator is not exposed to gaming risk, but generates revenue by taking a commission or other charge based on the stakes or the prize, and shall include player versus player games such as poker, bingo, betting exchange, and other commission based games; Type 4 games – controlled Skill Games. In addition, the following are the exempt games, which do not require a licence: a game of skill which does not require a stake to enable participation, and, or does not envisage the possibility of a prize; a game of skill which requires a stake to enable participation and offers the possibility of a prize, unless the MGA issues a ruling determining that such a game of skill is a controlled skill game; a game of chance which does not require a stake to enable participation, and/or does not envisage the possibility of a prize, unless otherwise determined by the MGA in a binding instrument; a de minimis game, provided that cumulatively is a lottery or raffle type game, the stake does not exceed €1, the prize does not exceed €100, and the outcome is not based on the outcome of another game is considered to be a game exempt from licensing or permit requirements; and a licensable game organised on board any vessel flying or entitled to fly the flag of Malta, or registered in Malta, whilst said vessel is navigating outside the territorial waters of Malta. ## Application timeframe and phrases The application process realistically takes between six to twelve months from the submission of the application to obtaining of the license, however, this depends on the quality of the application and the readiness of the applicant to reply to the MGA’s queries. Upon the satisfactory review of the documentation submitted, the MGA gives the applicant 60 days to set up a technical infrastructure, which will then undergo a system audit which would review the test environment against the proposed application. If upon completion of the system audit, there are no material issues, the MGA will proceed to issue the license. List of documents & type of information needed to support application Acquiring a gaming license in Malta involves a rigorous process wherein applicants are required to submit detailed documentation providing sufficient and clear information relating to their proposed gaming operations. Applicants are required to submit the requested documentation to the MGA through the MGA online portal https://portal.mga.org.mt/ . The list of the documentation required to be submitted is encompassed in the MGA System Documentation Checklist available at https://www.mga.org.mt/system-documentation-checklist-update/ , which has been revised in March 2022 by the Authority and includes a business plan with three-year projections, policies and procedures, technical documentation, due diligence documents and contractual arrangements. Importantly, among the amendments introduced by the MGA is the exemption to submit technical policies and procedures where the gaming operator holds relevant ISO Certificate. Moreover, certified hard copies of due diligence documents, as well as originally signed declarations, are required to be provided. All this documentation will be subject to the review and scrutiny of the MGA. The MGA may require from the applicant any information, documentation and assurances as may be necessary and relevant for it to conduct a statutory review as well as the required probity checks and carries out an in-depth analysis of the applicant’s business plan and technical documentation submitted. ## Geographical cover The MGA does not impose territorial limitations on the use of its licence. Nevertheless, it is an obligation of each and every B2C licensee to exercise due care in selecting markets in which to pursue their activities and advertising, ensuring that the activity is underpinned by justifiable arguments. With respect to B2B licence holders, they are obliged to offer critical gaming supply solely to persons or entities that are licensed by the MGA or the competent regulator in another jurisdiction within the EU or EEA, or in another reputable jurisdiction where the MGA has an agreement with the relevant regulator. ## Applicant considerations In order for a person to be eligible to hold an MGA licence, such person has to be established in the EEA. There is no specific requirement for a licensee to be an incorporated entity in Malta. Furthermore, persons who perform key functions for the business do not necessarily have to be present in Malta. They must however be available upon MGA’s request. Licence holders are also subject to minimum issued and paid-up share capital requirements, as follows: B2C - Gaming Service Licence: ## Type 1 – Minimum €100,000 ## Type 2 – Minimum €100,000 ## Type 3 – Minimum €40,000 ## Type 4 – Minimum €40,000 B2B - Critical Gaming Supply Licence: ## • Minimum €40,000 Companies with multiple type approvals are required to meet the above share capital requirements cumulatively up to a maximum required capping of €240,000. Companies having or applying for a Corporate Licence are required to have the minimum Share Capital in any one of the entities forming part of the Corporate Licence. In 2025, the MGA published a Capital Requirements Policy, introducing an obligation binding on all licence holders to maintain a ‘positive equity position’. If a licence holder is in a ‘negative equity position’, a licence holder shall be obliged to restore its equity position within 6 months of the respective financial year end. In the case of a B2B licence holder, the obligation to restore the negative equity position to a positive one shall only be triggered once the negative equity position exceeds EUR 3,000,000. Licence holders licensed in 2025 must comply by 30 June 2026, while earlier licensed operators have a transitory period of up to five years. Entities with significant negative equity as of 31 December 2024 must submit a detailed, MGA-approved recapitalisation plan by 30 November 2025. ## The Key Function Roles The Key Function Roles have to be appointed at different stages of the application. At the application stage, notification to the MGA must be made regarding those who will hold the roles of Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Officer, and if applicable, the MLRO. Later, within six months of the issuing of the licence, the MGA must be notified as to who has been appointed to exercise the remaining Key Function Roles. It should be noted that if there is no person that is approved by the MGA to fulfil the Key Function roles, the responsibility for the functions shall be vested in the directors of the company. Should there be a resignation of any of these roles, the licensee would need to notify the MGA by no later than three working days of such resignation. They would also be obliged to inform the MGA about the appointment of the replacement by no later than 15 working days after such resignation. In view of the changes to Directive 3 of 2018 published in October 2021, some Key Function Roles have been merged. The Key Function Roles required for B2Cs: ## CEO ## Key Gaming Operations ## Key Compliance ## Key Legal ## Key Data Protection ## Key AML & CFT ## Key Technology ## Internal Audit The Key Functions to be appointed by a B2B Licensees are: ## CEO ## Key Gaming Operations ## Compliance Officer ## Key Legal ## Key Data Protection ## Key Technology ## Internal Audit A fit and proper test on individuals taking on key roles within the gaming operations will also be carried out by the Authority. In doing so, the MGA seeks to examine and determine the suitability of the applicant to hold a licence, depending on the licence category and the type/s of games and/or services, and also to ensure that the applicant and all relevant persons having a qualified interest in the gaming operations satisfy the fit and proper requirements. Apart from the fact that individuals taking a Key Function role must be fit and proper, these individuals are required to show that they hold the necessary academic qualifications as well as professional experience in order to fulfil such a role. Furthermore, they must continue their training through Continuous Professional Development (“CPD”) which can come in the form of: ## Professional education activities ## Presentations ## Teaching/lecturing/presentations ## Publication of articles Professional examinations. The fulfilment of these courses must be verifiable and evidence of the relevance of the activity must be stated for the purpose of this requirement. This Policy came into force on the 20th October 2021, however, key functions certificate holders will need to adhere to the CPD requirements upon their renewal of their Key Function Certification. In line with the MGA’s Regulatory Oversight: Supervisory Engagement Efforts 2025, the Authority published the findings of its Governance Assurance Thematic Review on Key Functions on 29 July 2026. This review assessed governance arrangements across a sample of B2B and B2C Authorised Persons, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of the CEO, Compliance, Internal Audit and AML/ CFT functions. Lawyer guidance (pre-schema) indicates no major structural change is anticipated to this framework, with the MGA expected only to issue further clarificatory instruments; this is consistent with the MGA's targeted 2026 consultation on proposed enhancements to the Recognition Notice Framework, which represents a key forward-looking licensing development.

ConfirmedExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Mixed

Time-to-launch is typically 9 months or more, depending on the complexity and readiness of the application and technical setup. In order for a person to be eligible to hold an MGA licence, such person has to be established in the EEA. There is no specific requirement for a licensee to be an incorpo…

Full analysis · 232 words

Time-to-launch is typically 9 months or more, depending on the complexity and readiness of the application and technical setup. In order for a person to be eligible to hold an MGA licence, such person has to be established in the EEA. There is no specific requirement for a licensee to be an incorporated entity in Malta. However, the licensee must satisfy the applicable requirements concerning its operations . Furthermore, persons who perform key functions for the business do not necessarily have to be present in Malta. They must however be available upon MGA’s request The Key Function Roles have to be appointed at different stages of the application. At the application stage, notification to the MGA must be made regarding those who will hold the roles of Chief Executive Officer, Compliance Officer, and if applicable, the MLRO. Later, within six months of the issuing of the licence, the MGA must be notified as to who has been appointed to exercise the remaining Key Function Roles. Licensees are obliged to maintain a live or real-time mirror server for essential regulatory data being at all times accessible to the MGA. Minimum share capital is €100,000 (Type 1/2) or €40,000 (Type 3/4), with higher cumulative requirements applying where multiple game types are offered. Bottlenecks centre on fit-and-proper vetting, system review and the AML/CFT framework build. The adviser stack (including law firms, CSPs, auditors) is mature.

ConfirmedExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Mixed

A €5,000 application fee applies to a new licence. Fixed annual licence fee is €25,000 for B2C Types 1–3 and €10,000 for Type 4-only. The variable compliance contribution is tiered by type and revenue: Type 1 €15k–€375k, Type 2 €25k–€600k, Type 3 €25k–€500k, Type 4 €5k–€500k. System review and compl…

Full analysis · 58 words

A €5,000 application fee applies to a new licence. Fixed annual licence fee is €25,000 for B2C Types 1–3 and €10,000 for Type 4-only. The variable compliance contribution is tiered by type and revenue: Type 1 €15k–€375k, Type 2 €25k–€600k, Type 3 €25k–€500k, Type 4 €5k–€500k. System review and compliance audit fees are payable to MGA-approved external auditors.

Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

Malta's gaming tax was restructured by Legal Notice 84 of 2026, effective 1 October 2026, replacing a prior flat 5% rate with a tiered structure: 15% on Type 1 casino, RNG and lottery revenue, 10% on Types 2 through 4 betting, peer-to-peer and skill-product revenue, and 5% on controlled-premises and lawful-junket revenue, the last unchanged from the prior flat rate. Tax is computed monthly, with the first return under the new rates due 20 November 2026. The reform also raised the Studio Broadcasting Levy payable by critical-gaming-supply licensees from €500 to €3,000 per annum, payable in advance, effective the same date. The combined effect is a materially higher cost base for Type 1 operators specifically, a moderate increase for Types 2 through 4 operators, and no headline-rate change for controlled-premises and junket operators, while all licensees face the raised broadcasting levy if they hold critical-gaming-supply status.

Not reviewedRead update

The revised gaming tax and VAT framework introduced by LN 84/2026 and LN 86/2026 entered into force on 1 October 2026. The Malta Gaming Authority has confirmed a transitional reporting mechanism: submissions for the September 2026 reporting period remain due on 20 October 2026, completed in accordance with the requirements applicable to that reporting period under the prior regime, while new-regime portal functionality becomes live from 1 November 2026. The practical cost impact is administrative rather than a change in tax rate or base: operators must correctly apply the prior regime's filing requirements to the September period notwithstanding the new framework's nominal commencement, and should expect full operational use of the new portal only from November onward.

Not reviewedRead update

Legal Notice 84 of 2026 consolidates Malta's gaming tax and gaming device levy into a single structure effective 1 October 2026, setting rates of fifteen per cent of aggregate gaming revenue for Type 1 services and ten per cent for Types 2, 3 and 4, the latter including controlled skill games, with controlled gaming premises and junkets taxed at five per cent. For remote services, taxability turns on the player's establishment, permanent address or usual residence rather than physical presence. The same instrument introduces a new Studio Broadcasting Levy of three thousand euro per year for critical gaming supply studios and deletes a prior regulation that had sat alongside the former levy mechanism. Layered on top, Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows the VAT exemption for gambling services from the same date, bringing remote betting, RNG casino, poker and bingo within VAT in principle, subject to place-of-supply rules confining the Maltese charge to Malta-resident customers. Together these instruments raise the cost-to-operate baseline for every licence type from 1 October 2026.

Not reviewedRead update

Legal Notices 84 and 86 of 2026, both effective 1 October 2026, materially reset Malta's cost-to-operate basis for gambling licensees. Legal Notice 86 amended the VAT Act so that the VAT exemption for gambling supplies now applies only to low-risk games, approved occasional junket events, and on-site betting facilities for live sporting events; other gaming services lose blanket exemption, become VAT-taxable, and gain a right to recover eligible input VAT. Legal Notice 84 amended the Gaming Tax Regulations to consolidate the gaming tax and the gaming device levy into a single tax structure keyed to game type and mode of offer. Operators filing for the September 2026 period remain subject to the prior regime for that submission, with filings due by 20 October 2026, notwithstanding that the new structure is already in force for current activity. The combined effect is a joint shift in both the VAT treatment and the underlying tax calculation methodology that licensees must now model together.

Not reviewedRead update

From 1 October 2026, the Gaming Tax (Amendment) Regulations 2026 replace Malta's flat five per cent gaming tax with rates differentiated by service type and abolish the existing device-based levy; local casino revenue is separately reported as rising from five per cent to fifteen per cent from the same date. From the same effective date, Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows the VAT exemption under Item 9 of the Fifth Schedule to the VAT Act (Cap. 406) to 'betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling, as may be approved by the Minister', moving a wider range of gambling and business-to-business platform and game-supplier supplies from VAT-exempt to taxable status. Together, these two instruments represent a material and near-term increase in the cost base for Malta-licensed operators, with 1 October 2026 as the operative planning date across both the direct gaming-tax and indirect VAT dimensions of the cost structure.

Not reviewedRead update

The Gaming Tax (Amendment) Regulations, 2026, issued under Article 12 of the Gaming Act and confirmed at Tier 1 by both the Malta Gaming Authority and PwC Malta, restructure Malta's gaming tax basis from a flat statutory rate to differentiated rates set by service type. The regulations abolish the existing device-based levy entirely and introduce a higher fixed studio broadcasting levy, with all changes effective 1 October 2026. As subordinate regulations made under the enabling Act rather than primary legislation itself, this instrument carries mixed durability: it can be revised again by the same mechanism without recourse to full legislative process. The practical effect for operators is increased compliance complexity, since the applicable tax rate now turns on classifying revenue by service type rather than applying a single uniform figure, and operators with studio-broadcast exposure face a materially higher fixed levy under the new schedule. This is a confirmed, structural cost-side tightening that should be built into any Malta cost model ahead of the October 2026 effective date.

Not reviewedRead update

Malta's cost-to-operate picture shifted materially this cycle. Legal Notice 84 of 2026 replaces the prior flat five per cent gaming tax and twelve-and-a-half to thirty per cent device levy with a fifteen per cent tax on Type 1 games' aggregate gaming revenue, effective 1 October 2026, abolishing the device levy and introducing a new three-thousand-euro annual studio broadcasting levy; the equivalent tiered rates for Type 2 through 4 games are not yet fully resolved. Compounding this, Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows the VAT exemption under Item 9 of the Fifth Schedule of the VAT Act to betting, lotteries, and other Minister-approved forms of gambling, per MTCA Guidelines issued 6 April 2026, bringing some previously exempt gambling-service flows into VAT scope. Both instruments carry mixed durability, resting on primary tax statutes implemented through ministerial legal notices, and together they raise the effective cost base for both incumbents and new entrants from 1 October 2026.

ConfirmedNot reviewed7 post-review updates · Not reviewedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Gaming tax is 5% of gaming revenue from Malta-resident players under the Gaming Tax Regulations (S.L. 583.10). Corporate tax is 35% statutory, reduced to ~5% effective via Malta's full-imputation and refund system for non-resident shareholders. B2B licensees are not subject to gaming tax. Land-based…

Full analysis · 59 words

Gaming tax is 5% of gaming revenue from Malta-resident players under the Gaming Tax Regulations (S.L. 583.10). Corporate tax is 35% statutory, reduced to ~5% effective via Malta's full-imputation and refund system for non-resident shareholders. B2B licensees are not subject to gaming tax. Land-based gaming devices attract a gaming levy (30% Type 1/2, 12.5% Type 3/4, 15% controlled premises).

ConfirmedNot reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Favourable

Payment rails for MGA-licensed operators are broad — cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and (within DLT sandbox parameters) some crypto. PSP friendliness is standard for licensed operators given the EU-regulated status. Banking access can require diligence but is generally available within the establi…

Full analysis · 45 words

Payment rails for MGA-licensed operators are broad — cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and (within DLT sandbox parameters) some crypto. PSP friendliness is standard for licensed operators given the EU-regulated status. Banking access can require diligence but is generally available within the established Maltese fintech ecosystem.

Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

The MGA's 2026 supervisory programme is reported to include a thematic review targeting crypto-asset and cash-based payment internal controls at licensees. This finding carries only Uncertain confidence: it is sourced to a single Tier 3 secondary characterisation of the underlying MGA supervisory priorities report, and the primary MGA document itself was not independently retrieved this cycle. No durability rating applies to a characterisation of this kind. Operators with material crypto or cash payment volume should treat this as an early, unconfirmed signal of heightened supervisory attention to payment-flow controls intersecting with AML/CFT, rather than as an established or binding new obligation. Direct sourcing of the underlying MGA document would be required to upgrade this finding toward Confirmed or Probable in a future cycle.

Not reviewedRead update

Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows Malta's VAT exemption for gambling services, substituting Item 9 of Part Two of the Fifth Schedule of the VAT Act so that the exemption now covers only betting, lotteries, and other Minister-approved forms of gambling, effective 1 October 2026. The MTCA issued implementing Guidelines on 6 April 2026 to accompany the change. The practical effect for licensees is that some gambling-service consideration flows previously treated as VAT-exempt will newly fall within VAT scope from the effective date, altering the payments and tax interface for products outside the exempted categories. This instrument carries mixed durability, resting on a primary VAT statute amended through ministerial legal notice, and it lands in the same cycle as the parallel gaming-tax restructuring under Legal Notice 84 of 2026, compounding the combined fiscal impact on payment flows tied to gambling consideration.

ProbableNot reviewed2 post-review updates · Not reviewedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Mixed

Only licensed operators or recognition-notice holders may promote licensable games. Marketing remains available to licensed operators within a well-developed regulatory framework, in particular the Commercial Communications Regulations (S.L/ 583.09 of the Laws of Malta) (Regulations). Furthermore, …

Full analysis · 492 words

Only licensed operators or recognition-notice holders may promote licensable games. Marketing remains available to licensed operators within a well-developed regulatory framework, in particular the Commercial Communications Regulations (S.L/ 583.09 of the Laws of Malta) (Regulations). Furthermore, commercial communications conveyed via broadcasting means such as radio and television are also subject to the rules envisaged in the Broadcasting Act (Chapter 350 of the Laws of Malta) and Subsidiary Legislation (S.L. 350.25 of the Laws of Malta) Requirements as to Advertisements, Methods of Advertising and Directions Applicable to Gambling Advertisements. The latter envisages rules in relation to the broadcasting times of gambling products, including specific rules in relation to the advertising of gambling products which are strictly related to sporting events. This being said, gambling advertisements are not allowed to be broadcasted on TV 6:00 am and 7:00 pm and on radio between 6:00 am and 09:00 am and between 2:00 pm and 7:00 pm. Commercial communications must be socially responsible, with particular regard to the need to protect minors and other vulnerable persons from harm or exploitation. Unsolicited commercial communications as well as targeting self-excluded players is expressly prohibited. Advertising is mainly prohibited in public places including in or on any means of public transportation with just a few exceptions, such as airports, hotels, conferences organised in relation to the gaming sector, premises of the operator, premises of organisers or beneficiaries of authorised low-risk games; and newspapers or magazines. Educational responsible gaming messaging shall be prominently included within all commercial communications related to gaming. In addition to this, all commercial communications, with the exception of sponsorships, must prominently display, for their entire duration, a sign indicating the minimum age to participate in the game being promoted. Sponsorships are also regulated by the previously mentioned regulations. Sponsorships shall be limited to text, logo or imagery which is necessary in order to identify the gaming operator. Information or graphics related to specific product offerings, characters or game types is prohibited. Sponsoring events where the audience is mainly comprised of minors or sponsoring minors is not acceptable, as is advertising in televised programmes targeting minors or vulnerable people. Any promotions that are taking place cannot be misleading. The only instances where commercial communication is exempt from the applicability of these Regulations are in those cases where the sole purpose is clearly that of informing the public about an employment opportunity or for an educational purpose. In the latter case, the commercial communication distributed shall in no manner be construed as having marketing or promotional connotations. In 2019, the MGA announced the establishment of the Commercial Communications Committee which is entrusted with ensuring that the Regulations are being adhered to by all gaming operators by reviewing commercial communications complaints brought to its attention and in the process assessing any possible breaches of the Regulation. As per the 2024 MGA Annual Report, the Commercial Communications Committee took seven decisions regarding possible breaches of the Gaming Commercial Communications Regulations.

ConfirmedExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Favourable

## Infrastructure The key technical setup shall be located in Malta or in another Member State of the EU or the EEA. Nevertheless, the MGA may, on a case by case basis, allow the placement of the key technical setup in other geographical locations where it is reasonably satisfied that such other lo…

Full analysis · 648 words

## Infrastructure The key technical setup shall be located in Malta or in another Member State of the EU or the EEA. Nevertheless, the MGA may, on a case by case basis, allow the placement of the key technical setup in other geographical locations where it is reasonably satisfied that such other location, taking all the relevant circumstances into account, offers equivalent safeguards to those offered by locations in the EEA. Key technical setup means the technical infrastructure of the licensee, including all the hardware and virtual machines in operation with the respective internal IP addresses, including all the geographic locations and addresses of premises where the essential components are located. Hardware forming part of the key technical setup may only be located in premises which adhere to a high level of information security. In addition, the licensees are obliged to maintain a live or real-time mirror server for essential regulatory data in Malta, being at all times accessible to the MGA upon request. ## Integrations Currently, there is no general requirement for licensees to maintain a specific integration with the MGA; however, the legislation provides that the MGA may, at any time, require a licensee, a specific category of licensees or all licensees to connect any of its systems or a system operated by the MGA, and to maintain such connection at all times. ## Software certification There is not a specific list of testing labs, however any random number generated games need to be tested for their randomness and an RNG certificate is required to be provided to the MGA as part of the licensing process. Once all the documents provided to the MGA as part of the application process are to their satisfaction, the MGA will inform the applicant that the application was successful and will invite the applicant to implement the operation onto a technical environment in preparation to go live. The applicant will be allowed 60 days to complete this technical roll-out, after which the application will be considered as cancelled and subject to re-application. At any stage within those 60 days, the applicant may appoint a Service Provider approved by the MGA to carry out a system audit. The systems audit will verify the live environment against the proposed application. Following the publication of the revised MGA System Documentation Checklist, in November 2022 the MGA also published a revised version of the System Audit Checklist, which comes into force for any System Audits as of 01 January 2023. In addition, a new System Review Checklist was issued, which will be used after licence issuance, to verify that the implemented systems operated by the Licensee reflect the information submitted to the Authority, as well as being in line with the requirements emanating from the Gaming Act and any other relevant subsidiary legislations. System Reviews will generally be required one year after issuance of a new licence, or within a shorter time frame if a system audit was not required at licence issuance stage. System Reviews will also be carried out by the approved Service Providers. The System Review in essence substitutes the Compliance Audit, based on the Compliance Audit Manual, which will now be undertaken on an ad-hoc basis for long standing licensees, or in instances where the MGA decides upon. In 2024, and with further clarification in 2025, the MGA has introduced minor updates to the Audits section of its portal, outlining revised procedures for System Audits, System Reviews, and Compliance Audits. Approved Audit Service Providers must submit reports electronically within 60 days for System Audits/Reviews or 90 days for Compliance Audits. Any non-compliance identified must be promptly addressed by the licensee, with follow-up checks marked as 'Resolved at Audit Stage' or 'Partially Compliant'. A one-time extension may be requested to resolve unresolved issues, subject to MGA approval. The Authority may reject audit reports if significant unresolved non-compliance prevents a conclusive outcome.

ProbableExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Mixed

App-store distribution is available for licensed operators subject to Apple/Google gambling-app policies requiring local authorisation. Ad-platform access (Google, Meta) is conditioned on licensed status and certification. Affiliate distribution is permitted but constrained by the Commercial Commu…

Full analysis · 37 words

App-store distribution is available for licensed operators subject to Apple/Google gambling-app policies requiring local authorisation. Ad-platform access (Google, Meta) is conditioned on licensed status and certification. Affiliate distribution is permitted but constrained by the Commercial Communications Regulations.

ProbableExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

## Regulating bodies The Malta Gaming Authority (the “MGA”) is the main regulatory authority. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (the “FIAU”) is the AML/CFT supervisory authority. Commercial Communications Committee and Malta Broadcasting Authority are additional advertising authorities tog…

Full analysis · 575 words

## Regulating bodies The Malta Gaming Authority (the “MGA”) is the main regulatory authority. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (the “FIAU”) is the AML/CFT supervisory authority. Commercial Communications Committee and Malta Broadcasting Authority are additional advertising authorities together with the MGA. The Office of the Information and Data Protection Commissioner is the national supervisory authority responsible for monitoring and enforcing the provisions of the GDPR and the Data Protection Act. Malta Competition and Consumer Affairs Authority is the national authority that has among its main functions to safeguard consumers’ interests and enhance their welfare. ## Supervision by Regulator The Gaming Act provides for enforcement measures whether the breach is a case of a reported or suspected breach of the laws and regulations or whether the breach is identified through an ad hoc investigation. The third schedule to the Gaming Act lists which breaches shall be deemed to be of a criminal nature. Other breaches which are not listed under this schedule will be considered to be administrative breaches which will be converted into criminal breaches should the administrative remedy fail to be satisfied by the respective gaming operator. Through the regulatory framework overhaul, the supervisory powers of the MGA have been restructured to strengthen its investigative powers and bolster regulatory efficacy. The MGA can require a licensee to take any necessary measures or to provide any information to prove that the company complies with all relevant regulations. The MGA may conduct a review of the actions and/or of the operations by the licensee. If the licensee is not adhering to the regulations set in place, the MGA will give adequate time for the licensee to remedy this.If the MGA is still not satisfied after such period, it may launch a formal investigation. At the end of the formal investigations, the MGA will provide the licensee with a report setting out its findings and any resulting measures. The MGA enforces via the Gaming Compliance and Enforcement Regulations (S.L. 583.06). Tools include administrative penalties under Article 25(3). The MGA may carry out the following enforcement measures: Issue an order to the licensee to do or to cease doing something in order to be compliant with all the regulations; Issue a warning to do, or refrain from doing, something in the future; Adding, removing or amending conditions attached to the authorisation held by the relevant licensee; In the case of a breach which is not an offence against the Gaming Act, imposing an administrative penalty; In the case where the breach is an offence against the Gaming Act, it may start criminal proceedings; and, or Suspending or cancelling the licence. Enforcement is risk-based. This cycle illustrates a more active AML/CFT supervisory environment, with the FIAU making use of its enforcement powers in a manner that gives operators clearer practical guidance on expected customer-due-diligence, reporting and screening standards, including an administrative penalty of EUR69,000 against a Malta-licensed bank, EUR225,730 (plus a EUR2,000 daily penalty) against a gaming operator for customer-due-diligence and reporting failures, and a further administrative penalty of EUR80,907 against another gaming operator in relation to player screening and investigation, including PEP-related controls. The MGA has also issued public notices disclaiming unauthorized operators, including operators linked to surrendered MGA licences. Legal Notices 82 of 2026 further expands the FIAU's toolkit through enhanced administrative penalties, settlement powers and a temporary settlement window. Cross-border, the dominant theme remains Article 56A litigation rather than domestic punitive action against MGA licensees themselves.

Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

The Malta Gaming Authority cancelled Oddsfly Limited's authorisation on 14 July 2025 for unpaid fees, following a Notice of Cancellation dated 29 May 2025 issued under S.L. 583.06 reg. 9(2)(a), which affords an authorised person a twenty-day period to show cause before the Authority proceeds with the enforcement measure; €104,814.52 was at issue. Separately, secondary press reporting (not yet corroborated by a primary Authority text) describes the Authority cancelling Winzon Group Limited's B2C licence (MGA/B2C/717/2019), retroactive to 11 March 2026, with penalties of €147,080 and unpaid fees of €46,693.23. The Authority's own thematic review of governance and key-function assurance across licensees found common themes of over-reliance on a limited number of senior decision-makers and insufficient evidence of challenge and impact assessment, a structural governance finding distinct from the two cancellations. Taken together, these indicate continuing supervisory intensity rather than an isolated incident. Confirmation of the Winzon action from the Authority's own primary sources remains outstanding.

Not reviewedRead update

Enforcement attention this period centres on the European Commission's infringement procedure INFR(2025)2100 against Article 56A of the Gaming Act, the provision requiring Maltese courts to refuse recognition of certain foreign judgments against Malta-licensed operators. The Commission issued a letter of formal notice on 18 June 2025, finding the provision's systematic public-policy refusal mechanism incompatible with Regulation (EU) 1215/2012. Malta replied at the end of September 2025, and the Commission's analysis of that reply was ongoing as at a February 2026 statement attributed to Commissioner McGrath; no reasoned opinion or Court referral has been identified as at October 2026. This sits alongside Case C-683/24, where Advocate General Emiliou's Opinion of 23 April 2026 found a provision of this kind contrary to EU law if the underlying reference is admissible, a tension sharpened by a Maltese court's 11 January 2024 decree declining to refer questions on Article 56A to the Court of Justice. No enforcement events against individual operators were evidenced this period.

Not reviewedRead update

The Malta Gaming Authority suspended Condor Malta Limited's authorisation effective 16 September 2026, disclosed 28 September 2026, citing four provisions of the Gaming Compliance and Enforcement Regulations together with compliance and financial issues; the Authority directed continued player account access for visibility purposes, and Condor Malta's separate UK remote licence remains unaffected. Earlier, under regulation 10(2)(b) of the same Regulations, the Authority cancelled Winzon Group Limited's B2C gaming service licence with immediate effect, applied retroactively to 11 March 2026, with a EUR 147,080 penalty, as part of a wider shutdown of an associated network of over 40 websites; the Regulations' special proviso was invoked to bypass the usual 20-day show-cause period. The Authority also published a further notice in September 2026 identifying multiple unauthorised URLs impersonating licensed operators, continuing a recurring anti-impersonation pattern. Together these actions evidence a sustained, assertive enforcement posture spanning suspension, cancellation with financial penalty, and public disclaimer of impersonating sites, rather than an isolated event.

Not reviewedRead update

The Malta Gaming Authority cancelled Winzon Group Limited's business-to-consumer authorisation (MGA/B2C/717/2019) retroactively to 11 March 2026, acting under regulation 10(2)(b) of Subsidiary Legislation 583.06, with outstanding fees of EUR 46,693.23 and administrative penalties of EUR 147,080 recorded on the Authority's own enforcement register. This is a live demonstration of the regulator's power to cancel authorisations with retroactive effect and impose material financial penalties under its compliance-enforcement subsidiary legislation. Separately, the Authority's 2026 Supervisory Engagement Efforts add thematic reviews of cash and cash-equivalent and crypto-asset internal controls, athlete and esports betting-integrity reviews, and enhanced oversight of operator monthly alternative dispute resolution reporting as named 2026 priorities. These are forward-looking supervisory-attention signals rather than new statutory obligations, and indicate where the next enforcement or inspection activity is most likely to concentrate. No new enforcement instrument beyond the Winzon cancellation was identified this cycle.

Not reviewedRead update

This cycle's central enforcement finding is the MGA's cancellation of Winzon Group Limited's B2C gaming service licence, applied with immediate effect and retroactively to 11 March 2026, under regulation 10(2)(b) of the Gaming Compliance and Enforcement Regulations. The regulator invoked a special proviso to bypass the standard twenty-day show-cause period, and imposed an administrative penalty of EUR 147,080 plus EUR 46,693.23 in outstanding fees. This claim is Probable, not Confirmed: it rests on a single Tier 3 report, and no MGA-published enforcement-register cross-check was located this cycle to corroborate it at Tier 1. The procedural mechanism itself is not durability-rated in the evidence base. Read at face value, the use of an expedited-bypass proviso against a licensee is a Probable indicator that MGA is willing to move faster than its routine enforcement cadence where it assesses acute risk, a posture shift the Interpreter itself flags only at Probable confidence. No enforcement events beyond Winzon were sourced this cycle, and no cross-border or extraterritorial enforcement mechanism was evidenced. The civil-law-family enforcement theory for unregulated operators cannot be populated for Malta this cycle for want of an MT-specific claim; this is recorded as a gap rather than inferred.

Not reviewedRead update

Enforcement is the highest-conviction tightening signal in Malta's 2026 cycle. The FIAU fined Stanleybet Malta Limited two hundred twenty-five thousand seven hundred thirty euro plus a two thousand euro daily penalty for customer due diligence failures, a probable-confidence, tier-three-sourced action consistent with a longer, confirmed trend: FIAU supervisory interventions rose from fifty-five in 2018 to eight hundred seventy cumulative across 2019 to 2024, and fines rose from nine hundred ninety thousand euro in 2018 to more than twenty-nine and a half million euro since 2019, with the Constitutional Court repeatedly affirming the FIAU's underlying penalty powers even while striking aspects of its prior fine procedure. A new settlement mechanism under Legal Notices 82 and 83 of 2026 softens the procedure for contesting fines without reducing the underlying compliance lift required to avoid them, and is best read as a fragile, ministerial-notice-level adaptation layered onto a mixed-durability statutory base. Separately, the MGA's March 2026 Supervisory Priorities, an uncertain-confidence, single-source signal, flag continued focus on crypto-asset internal controls, ADR reporting quality, and sports-betting integrity as forward enforcement priorities, though none has yet crystallised into an enacted requirement.

ProbableExpert approved textNot reviewed · data updated since review6 post-review updates · Not reviewedIn expert review scope12 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Mixed

The outlook is broadly stable-positive on market fundamentals but clouded by the Article 56A infringement procedure. If the CJEU rules against Bill 55, the cross-border value of an MGA licence within the EU could be diminished, exposing operators to AT/DE player-loss litigation. The 2025 Capital Req…

Full analysis · 52 words

The outlook is broadly stable-positive on market fundamentals but clouded by the Article 56A infringement procedure. If the CJEU rules against Bill 55, the cross-border value of an MGA licence within the EU could be diminished, exposing operators to AT/DE player-loss litigation. The 2025 Capital Requirements Policy signals a tightening financial-soundness posture.

Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

The most significant item on Malta's reform horizon is the outstanding final judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-683/24, following an Advocate General Opinion that found Article 56A of the Gaming Act, Malta's judgment-enforcement shield, manifestly incompatible with the Brussels Ia Regulation. That Opinion is not binding on the Court and the final judgment remains pending. A previously flagged plan for a new Malta Gaming Authority Enforcement Guide, raised in prior findings, had not been confirmed as published as at the research.

Not reviewedRead update

Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows the VAT gambling exemption from 1 October 2026, replacing the prior exemption wording with a Minister-approved category list covering low-risk games, occasional approved junket events, and betting accessible only at the venue of the real-life sporting event. Remote betting, RNG casino, poker and bingo become VAT-taxable in principle, though B2C place-of-supply rules mean Maltese VAT is due only on Malta-resident customers; the underlying MTCA guideline detailing the approved exempt categories could not be directly verified and currently rests on secondary commentary. Separately, Advocate General Emiliou's Opinion of 23 April 2026 in Case C-683/24 may presage a Court of Justice ruling materially affecting the validity of Article 56A of the Gaming Act, a development operators should track alongside the still-open Commission infringement procedure.

Not reviewedRead update

The dominant reform-horizon item for Malta is the unresolved status of Article 56A of the Gaming Act. The European Commission's infringement action INFR(2025)2100 remains open, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a preliminary ruling on 16 April 2026 on the territorial scope of Malta Gaming Authority licences, and an Advocate-General opinion of 23 April 2026 in Case C-683/24 found Article 56A incompatible with Brussels I bis. The Malta Gaming Authority disputes this characterisation, and no final Court of Justice judgment or legislative repeal has occurred this cycle. Separately, the Gaming Tax (Amendment) Regulations 2026 and Legal Notice 86 of 2026 (VAT Act) both take effect 1 October 2026, representing fixed near-term fiscal reform with a known effective date, distinct from the still-open legal-reform question surrounding Article 56A.

Not reviewedRead update

The Malta Gaming Authority published its Supervisory Engagement Efforts for 2026, a confirmed Tier 1 regulator document setting out risk-based supervisory priorities covering compliance, player protection and sports-betting integrity through the remainder of the year. As a regulator-issued priorities statement rather than primary legislation, this instrument is rendered as fragile in durability terms: it signals where MGA attention and resource will concentrate in the near term, but it does not itself create a new binding legal obligation. Read alongside this cycle's confirmed tax restructuring and Probable-confidence enforcement escalation, the priorities document indicates a regulator actively signalling its 2026 focus areas rather than a jurisdiction undergoing structural legislative reform this cycle.

ProbableNot reviewed4 post-review updates · Not reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 0 enforcement · 25 red flags · 13 sources · Expand full record

What gets operators fined

25 red flags (4 high, 12 medium, 9 low) and 5 controls that address them.

  • high
    Article 56A EC infringement procedure
    May dilute cross-border value of MGA licence within EU.
    Sources
  • high
    AT/DE player-loss recovery claims
    Operators face cross-border refund litigation and EAPO asset-freeze risk.
    Sources
  • high
    Possible amendment/repeal of Article 56A
    Regulatory baseline could shift materially.
    Sources
  • high
    CJEU referral uncertainty
    Material binary outcome risk to licence model.
    Sources
  • medium
    2025 Capital Requirements Policy positive-equity duty
    Negative-equity licensees must restore compliance promptly.
    Sources
  • medium
    Compliance contribution caps up to €600k
    High fixed ongoing cost for high-revenue operators.
    Sources
  • medium
    All B2C operators are PMLA subject persons
    Heavy AML/CFT obligation lift except Type 4-only.
    Sources
  • medium
    Strict commercial communications rules
    Breaches risk penalties and licence conditions.
    Sources
  • medium
    MGA suspension/cancellation powers
    Licence at risk on fit-and-proper or breach findings.
    Sources
  • medium
    External framing of Malta as enforcement shield
    Reputational exposure with banking and payment partners.
    Sources
  • medium
    Land-based gaming levy up to 30%
    High device levy for land-based Type 1/2.
    Sources
  • medium
    Banking access diligence for gaming entities
    Account-opening friction despite EU status.
    Sources
  • medium
    Affiliate content rules strict
    Affiliate marketing exposure to commercial-comms breaches.
    Sources
  • medium
    Fit-and-proper UBO/key-person vetting
    Application failure risk on probity grounds.
    Sources
  • medium
    High all-in first-year cost
    Mid-six-figure budget for enterprise-grade setup.
    Sources
  • medium
    VAT status varies by gambling sub-service
    Carve-out complexity requires per-service analysis.
    Sources
  • low
    Crypto gambling restricted to DLT sandbox
    Limited permitted crypto funding pathways.
    Sources
  • low
    €100k share capital for Type 1/2
    Upfront capitalisation requirement.
    Sources
  • low
    6+ month application timeline
    Delayed time-to-revenue.
    Sources
  • low
    Mandatory system review and compliance audit
    Recurring auditor cost and compliance burden.
    Sources
  • low
    National Lottery single-concession monopoly
    Lottery vertical closed to new entrants.
    Sources
  • low
    Data retention duties S.L. 583.12
    Compliance overhead for record retention.
    Sources
  • low
    Mandatory player-limit and self-exclusion tooling
    Tech and process build required.
    Sources
  • low
    App-store gambling-app authorisation gating
    Distribution restricted on iOS/Android.
    Sources
  • low
    10-year licence renewal process
    Renewal mirrors full application burden.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    Cross-border litigation ring-fencing
    Structure operations to limit AT/DE player-loss and EAPO exposure.
    Sources
  • 002
    Positive-equity monitoring
    Continuous equity monitoring to satisfy 2025 Capital Requirements Policy.
    Sources
  • 003
    AML/CFT framework
    PMLA-compliant CDD/EDD and FIAU implementing procedures.
    Sources
  • 004
    Commercial communications compliance
    S.L. 583.09 advertising controls and affiliate oversight.
    Sources
  • 005
    System review and audit readiness
    Pre-go-live and post-certification audit preparation.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

Casino operator seeking EU reach via MGA Type 1 licence.

Open-window application; 6+ months; €100k capital; 5% gaming tax on MT-resident GGR; Article 56A litigation exposure in AT/DE.

Do this: Proceed with cross-border litigation ring-fencing.

Sources

Slot studio supplying MGA operators.

Critical Gaming Supply Licence; no gaming tax; corporate tax with refund.

Do this: Obtain B2B licence for credibility and recognition.

Sources

Poker operator (Type 3).

Standalone Type 3 (peer-to-peer); €40k capital; €25k-€500k compliance contribution.

Do this: Confirm Type 3 scope before launch.

Sources

Operator with negative equity.

2025 Capital Requirements Policy requires prompt equity restoration.

Do this: Recapitalise to avoid MGA intervention.

Sources

Controlled skill-games (Type 4) operator.

Type 4-only is not a PMLA subject person; lower AML lift; €10k annual fee.

Do this: Confirm skill classification with MGA.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Baseline.taxes. full Type 1-4 service taxonomy with amendment-effective rates and VAT carve-out enumeration (≥6 categories) not directly confirmed against S.L. 583.03 / VAT Act Fifth Schedule.
  • searched: Malta gaming Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 tax rate
  • searched: Malta VAT gambling Item 9 Part Two Fifth Schedule
  • searched: Malta studio broadcasting levy gaming
  • checked: legislation.mt
Baseline.competitive landscape. unlicensed market share estimate not published by a T1/T2 source.
  • searched: Malta licensed operator count 2025 MGA
  • searched: Malta unlicensed gaming market share
  • searched: MGA licensee register total 2025
  • checked: mga.org.mt

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

Gaming tax is 5% of gaming revenue from Malta-resident players under S.L. 583.10.

MT-CL-001 · T1 of 4 · published 1 Jan 2025 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources