Jurisdictions › Malta › Outlook

Malta · Question 11 of 11

Outlook: What is coming?

Mixed · Probable · Not reviewed · 4 post-review updates · Not reviewed · Back to full Malta report →

Key section parameters

JurisdictionMalta (MT)
RegulatorMGA
FavourabilityMixed
ConfidenceProbable
Review statusNot reviewed · 4 post-review updates · Not reviewed
Last collected18 Oct 2026

Summary answer

The outlook is broadly stable-positive on market fundamentals but clouded by the Article 56A infringement procedure. If the CJEU rules against Bill 55, the cross-border value of an MGA licence within the EU could be diminished, exposing operators to AT/DE player-loss litigation. The 2025 Capital Req…

Not reviewed Information added after the 25 Jul 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewed

The most significant item on Malta's reform horizon is the outstanding final judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in C-683/24, following an Advocate General Opinion that found Article 56A of the Gaming Act, Malta's judgment-enforcement shield, manifestly incompatible with the Brussels Ia Regulation. That Opinion is not binding on the Court and the final judgment remains pending. A previously flagged plan for a new Malta Gaming Authority Enforcement Guide, raised in prior findings, had not been confirmed as published as at the research.

Not reviewed

Legal Notice 86 of 2026 narrows the VAT gambling exemption from 1 October 2026, replacing the prior exemption wording with a Minister-approved category list covering low-risk games, occasional approved junket events, and betting accessible only at the venue of the real-life sporting event. Remote betting, RNG casino, poker and bingo become VAT-taxable in principle, though B2C place-of-supply rules mean Maltese VAT is due only on Malta-resident customers; the underlying MTCA guideline detailing the approved exempt categories could not be directly verified and currently rests on secondary commentary. Separately, Advocate General Emiliou's Opinion of 23 April 2026 in Case C-683/24 may presage a Court of Justice ruling materially affecting the validity of Article 56A of the Gaming Act, a development operators should track alongside the still-open Commission infringement procedure.

Not reviewed

The dominant reform-horizon item for Malta is the unresolved status of Article 56A of the Gaming Act. The European Commission's infringement action INFR(2025)2100 remains open, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued a preliminary ruling on 16 April 2026 on the territorial scope of Malta Gaming Authority licences, and an Advocate-General opinion of 23 April 2026 in Case C-683/24 found Article 56A incompatible with Brussels I bis. The Malta Gaming Authority disputes this characterisation, and no final Court of Justice judgment or legislative repeal has occurred this cycle. Separately, the Gaming Tax (Amendment) Regulations 2026 and Legal Notice 86 of 2026 (VAT Act) both take effect 1 October 2026, representing fixed near-term fiscal reform with a known effective date, distinct from the still-open legal-reform question surrounding Article 56A.

Not reviewed

The Malta Gaming Authority published its Supervisory Engagement Efforts for 2026, a confirmed Tier 1 regulator document setting out risk-based supervisory priorities covering compliance, player protection and sports-betting integrity through the remainder of the year. As a regulator-issued priorities statement rather than primary legislation, this instrument is rendered as fragile in durability terms: it signals where MGA attention and resource will concentrate in the near term, but it does not itself create a new binding legal obligation. Read alongside this cycle's confirmed tax restructuring and Probable-confidence enforcement escalation, the priorities document indicates a regulator actively signalling its 2026 focus areas rather than a jurisdiction undergoing structural legislative reform this cycle.

Full section analysis

The outlook is broadly stable-positive on market fundamentals but clouded by the Article 56A infringement procedure. If the CJEU rules against Bill 55, the cross-border value of an MGA licence within the EU could be diminished, exposing operators to AT/DE player-loss litigation. The 2025 Capital Requirements Policy signals a tightening financial-soundness posture.