Jurisdictions › Spain

Spain

Federal layer

Enter via the next DGOJ tender — large growing market, clear pathway, heavy but manageable compliance.

5 open · 2 restricted · 2 closed · 4 uncertain · 7 not yet assessed → 20 classes
Regulator: DGOJ · Collected 24 Oct 2026 · Published 24 Oct 2026 · Changed 18 Oct 2026 PDF Sign in for PDF Compare

Can we offer our product?

Every product class, in fixed taxonomy order. The band is what you can do; where the recorded legal status says something the band does not, it is shown beside the product.

Player products

  • Casino
    Open
  • Poker
    Open
  • Bingo
    Open
  • LotteryState monopoly (sole exception to a general prohibition)
    Closed
  • Sports betting
    Open
  • Other event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Horse and greyhound racing betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Esports betting
    Open
  • Exchange betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Pool betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Virtual event betting
    Not yet assessed
  • Fantasy sportsGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Skill gamesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Prediction markets
    Not yet assessed
  • SweepstakesGrey zone
    Uncertain
  • Free play
    Not yet assessed

Supply roles

  • Software / B2BNot yet regulated
    Uncertain
  • Affiliate marketing
    Restricted
  • Payments for gambling
    Restricted

Settlement rail

  • Crypto gamblingProhibited (not actively enforced)
    Closed

No class-level certainty grade is recorded for this jurisdiction yet; confidence is carried per section below.

Board briefing

Spain is a large, growing, fully-regulated online gambling market with a record €1.45bn GGR in 2024 and an active, well-defined DGOJ licensing regime — entry is viable but tender-gated and compliance-heavy.

What has changed

  • The April 2024 Supreme Court ruling annulled several RD 958/2020 advertising restrictions, reintroducing welcome bonuses and easing acquisition; marketing spend rose 30% in 2024. A government amendment to Ley 13/2011 now seeks to restore those restrictions with proper legal cover, and a mandatory risk-detection algorithm (RD 176/2023) is due in 2026.

What to do now

  • Position for the next DGOJ general-licence tender; structure an EEA SA entity with €100k+ capital and a Spanish legal representative; build DGOJ real-time integration, RGIAJ self-exclusion and deposit-limit tooling; and design marketing that respects the surviving sponsorship ban and broadcast window.

What to watch

  • The Ley 13/2011 advertising amendment, the 2026 risk-detection algorithm deployment, and the timing of the next licensing tender.

11 answers, each dated and graded

The weather grades favourability for an operator, not legality: legality is the product table above. The left rule is our confidence: solid confirmed, dashed probable, dotted uncertain.

01 · What kind of market is this?

Overview

Favourable

Spain's online gambling regime tightened through two converging player-protection moves: a reopened DGOJ consultation on a mandatory, consent-independent risk-detection mechanism, and new mandatory advertising warning messages that entered into force on 6 October 2026. The underlying licensing archi…

Full analysis · 127 words

Spain's online gambling regime tightened through two converging player-protection moves: a reopened DGOJ consultation on a mandatory, consent-independent risk-detection mechanism, and new mandatory advertising warning messages that entered into force on 6 October 2026. The underlying licensing architecture is unchanged, with DGOJ processing routine singular-licence extensions during the period, so the market remains structurally stable for operators already present. The most consequential forward development is Real Decreto 520/2026's joint, cross-operator deposit-limit system, effective 25 March 2027, which will aggregate player deposits across every state-licensed operator rather than capping each operator individually. Meanwhile the sector's largest operator group, Cirsa, is proceeding through a EUR 2.8bn cross-border merger with Italy's Lottomatica, a transaction that would materially reshape market concentration once it closes, targeted for the second quarter of 2027.

  • Strict advertising and sponsorship constraints under RD 958/2020
  • Tenders open only periodically (18-month minimum gap)
  • High player-protection and AML compliance burden
Not reviewed Information added after the 2 Sep 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

Spain's gambling framework, anchored in Ley 13/2011 and supervised by the DGOJ, tightened through two implementing-level instruments rather than through the headline statutory reform. Real Decreto 813/2026 introduces a payment-account identity-matching duty for licensed operators, amending Article 21 of the identity-verification regulation and entering into force on 28 October 2026 with a six-month transitional period to 28 April 2027 for existing players. A separate DGOJ resolution mandates new harm-warning messages on gambling commercial communications, replacing the prior "play responsibly" slogan. Meanwhile the comprehensive reform of Ley 13/2011 remains stalled: the dissolution of the Cortes ahead of the 29 November 2026 snap election has halted parliamentary processing, with no Anteproyecto text published despite a public consultation that closed 22 June 2026. The licensing architecture itself is otherwise unchanged.

ConfirmedNot reviewed1 post-review update · Not reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
02 · Can we get a licence?

Licensing and regulation

Mixed

DGOJ remains Spain's sole state-level authority for licensing and supervising online gambling under Ley 13/2011, an enabling statute treated as the durable core of the regime. No standalone B2B licence exists: business-to-business suppliers may serve DGOJ-licensed B2C operators without a separate DG…

Full analysis · 167 words

DGOJ remains Spain's sole state-level authority for licensing and supervising online gambling under Ley 13/2011, an enabling statute treated as the durable core of the regime. No standalone B2B licence exists: business-to-business suppliers may serve DGOJ-licensed B2C operators without a separate DGOJ authorisation, the licensed perimeter attaching to the brand-holding operator. Counsel has expressly confirmed this and disowned any suggestion that suppliers require their own licence. The defining development is a consultation, opened July 2026 following a first consultation that closed 22 June 2026, on an Anteproyecto de Ley amending Ley 13/2011 to extend regulatory liability to technology and platform suppliers, a category presently outside the licensed-brand-holder perimeter the statute currently defines. The proposal remains at consultation stage, carrying mixed durability: it is an official government text but not yet enacted. If adopted, it would extend supply-chain accountability further than most EU peer regimes, positioning Spain ahead of comparable jurisdictions on this specific dimension, and it would do so by creating supplier-side obligations where none currently exist.

ConfirmedNot reviewed · changed since expert reviewIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
03 · How hard is entry, really?

Market entry in practice

Mixed

Entry requires EEA incorporation as an SA (or equivalent), a Spanish legal representative, minimum €100,000 capital, and securing both general and singular licences — the general licence available only via periodic public tender. No physical office is mandatory but a legal presence and DGOJ register…

Full analysis · 57 words

Entry requires EEA incorporation as an SA (or equivalent), a Spanish legal representative, minimum €100,000 capital, and securing both general and singular licences — the general licence available only via periodic public tender. No physical office is mandatory but a legal presence and DGOJ register entry are required. Time-to-launch is medium, gated by tender timing and certification.

04 · What do the licences cost?

Licence fees

Mixed

Application and administrative fees include approximately €38,000 for technical reports, €10,000 per gambling licence, and €2,500 per licence registration. Minimum paid-up share capital is €100,000, and economic guarantees scale with vertical and turnover.

05 · What is the tax take?

Tax

Favourable

Online gambling is taxed under the Impuesto sobre Actividades de Juego (Ley 13/2011 art. 48) at a headline 20% of GGR (reduced from 25% in 2018), with a reduced 10% rate for operators tax-resident in Ceuta or Melilla. Gambling is VAT-exempt; corporate tax is 25%. This module records fiscal matters o…

Full analysis · 73 words

Online gambling is taxed under the Impuesto sobre Actividades de Juego (Ley 13/2011 art. 48) at a headline 20% of GGR (reduced from 25% in 2018), with a reduced 10% rate for operators tax-resident in Ceuta or Melilla. Gambling is VAT-exempt; corporate tax is 25%. This module records fiscal matters only: the deposit-monitoring, 72-hour cooling-off and responsible-gambling test workflow material is recorded under player protection, on counsel's placement, and is not repeated here.

ConfirmedExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
06 · Can we move player money?

Payments and banking

Favourable

Payment rails are well-developed. The most common deposit methods are credit/debit cards (~76%) and e-wallets (~13%). PSP availability is adequate; anonymous payment methods are prohibited and full traceability is required. Banking risk for licensed operators is low; offshore operators face payment-…

Full analysis · 42 words

Payment rails are well-developed. The most common deposit methods are credit/debit cards (~76%) and e-wallets (~13%). PSP availability is adequate; anonymous payment methods are prohibited and full traceability is required. Banking risk for licensed operators is low; offshore operators face payment-channel interdiction.

Not reviewed Information added after the 2 Sep 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

Real Decreto 813/2026 directly affects how licensed gambling operators must process deposit and withdrawal payment instruments. The decree requires operators to verify that the holder of the payment method used for a deposit or withdrawal transaction is the same person as the holder of the gambling account, before crediting or returning funds electronically, and this condition is triggered specifically by non-face-to-face transactions. The duty takes effect 28 October 2026, with a six-month transitional period to 28 April 2027 for players already registered at the point the rule enters into force, giving operators a defined window to bring existing payment-verification workflows into compliance before the mismatch rule is enforced against pre-existing accounts.

ProbableNot reviewed1 post-review update · Not reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
07 · Can we advertise?

Marketing

Mixed

Marketing is permitted but heavily restricted under RD 958/2020, which imposed a 1am–5am broadcast window and a sports-sponsorship ban. The Supreme Court's April 2024 ruling (STS 527/2024) annulled several provisions for lack of legal coverage, including the new-customer promotion restriction and th…

Full analysis · 137 words

Marketing is permitted but heavily restricted under RD 958/2020, which imposed a 1am–5am broadcast window and a sports-sponsorship ban. The Supreme Court's April 2024 ruling (STS 527/2024) annulled several provisions for lack of legal coverage, including the new-customer promotion restriction and the information-society dissemination ban. The sports-sponsorship prohibition (art. 12) and the broadcast window survive. No restriction or limit on welcome bonuses is in force; counsel instructs that any such restriction be treated as removed, and dates that removal to 2025, though the instrument we hold annulling the relevant provisions is STS 527/2024 of 10 April 2024 and no 2025 instrument has been identified. The removal is recorded on counsel's authority; the 2025 basis is flagged as unsourced rather than asserted. A draft amendment to Ley 13/2011 seeks to restore the annulled restrictions with proper legal basis.

ConfirmedExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
08 · What must the platform meet?

Technical compliance

Mixed

DGOJ signalled at ICE Barcelona 2026 a shift toward continuous, data-driven supervisory monitoring, using behavioural analytics and real-time oversight in place of episodic inspection. This is an Uncertain-confidence signal, drawn from a single secondary source rather than a published DGOJ policy do…

Full analysis · 116 words

DGOJ signalled at ICE Barcelona 2026 a shift toward continuous, data-driven supervisory monitoring, using behavioural analytics and real-time oversight in place of episodic inspection. This is an Uncertain-confidence signal, drawn from a single secondary source rather than a published DGOJ policy document, but it is consistent with the broader tightening trajectory visible elsewhere this cycle. If realised, this shift would raise the practical technical-compliance burden on licensed operators independent of any statutory change, requiring investment in the monitoring, reporting and analytics infrastructure needed to satisfy a regulator watching continuously rather than at inspection intervals. Operators should treat this as an operational-planning signal rather than a confirmed new technical standard, given the confidence tier attached to it.

09 · Can we ship through apps and platforms?

Distribution and platforms

Mixed

App-store distribution is available for DGOJ-licensed operators. Ad-platform restrictions are shaped by RD 958/2020 (as partially annulled): social and search advertising to over-18s is now permitted following the 2024 Supreme Court ruling, but sponsorship and the broadcast time-window persist. Affi…

Full analysis · 87 words

App-store distribution is available for DGOJ-licensed operators. Ad-platform restrictions are shaped by RD 958/2020 (as partially annulled): social and search advertising to over-18s is now permitted following the 2024 Supreme Court ruling, but sponsorship and the broadcast time-window persist. Affiliates do not require a licence of their own and may only promote licensed operators, but they remain directly exposed to enforcement under RD 958/2020 in their own right rather than only through the operators they promote. Counsel confirms both limbs: no affiliate licence, and direct enforcement exposure.

ProbableExpert approvedIn expert review scopeRead full analysis & tables →
10 · How hard does the regulator enforce?

Enforcement

Mixed

The dominant enforcement development this cycle is a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced action against 888 Online Games España, SA, fined two penalties of €275,976 each (€551,952 total) plus a public reprimand for failing continuous business-relationship monitoring (article 6) and special-examination duties …

Full analysis · 254 words

The dominant enforcement development this cycle is a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced action against 888 Online Games España, SA, fined two penalties of €275,976 each (€551,952 total) plus a public reprimand for failing continuous business-relationship monitoring (article 6) and special-examination duties (article 17) under Ley 10/2010, published in the Boletín Oficial del Estado. This is the first AML-driven sanction against a DGOJ-licensed gambling operator observed in this dataset, evidencing that AML execution failures are a live enforcement vector within the licensed sector itself, not only against unlicensed offshore operators. On the sanctions available, the four-year activity ban is a statutory ceiling rather than a standard outcome: counsel confirms it operates as a maximum, and DGOJ's 2024 practice against unlicensed offshore operators ran to two-year bans alongside fines of up to €10 million. The apparent conflict between the four-year figure and the two-year bans observed in practice is therefore a ceiling-versus-practice distinction, not a data error. Separately, a probable-confidence report describes a Q1 2026 sanctions package totalling €10,290,500 against nine online gambling-sector companies, including two €5,000,000 fines on unlicensed foreign operators; this rests on secondary trade press rather than a directly retrieved DGOJ resolution and should be read with that sourcing caveat. Both enforcement threads rely on durable primary legislation, Ley 10/2010 and Ley 13/2011 respectively, as their statutory basis, so the underlying legal authority for enforcement is stable even where individual sourcing confidence varies. Operators should treat the 888 Online Games action as confirmation that continuous monitoring and special-examination compliance are active DGOJ and financial-supervisory priorities.

Not reviewed Information added after the 2 Sep 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

A DGOJ resolution published via the BOE mandates new technical specifications for harm-warning messages on losses and problem gambling that must accompany all gambling commercial communications, replacing the prior "play responsibly" slogan. Existing advertising contracts may run unadapted for three months, and the resolution becomes effective roughly sixty days after BOE publication. This finding is sourced via specialist gambling trade press summarising the BOE publication; the underlying BOE text was not independently retrieved, so the precise effective date and scope should be read with that caveat in mind. No enforcement event against a named operator, licence suspension, or revocation action was evidenced. The development represents a tightening of mandatory advertising content rather than a new enforcement power or a change to the DGOJ's existing sanctioning authority under Ley 13/2011.

Not reviewedRead update

DGOJ combined first-half and second-half sanctions reached approximately EUR142 million this year, reported by secondary commentary as the largest annual enforcement total in the regulator's history, concentrated on very-serious-offence fines against unlicensed supply. This aggregate derives from secondary-source commentary; named individual DGOJ sanctioning resolutions were not independently retrieved this period. The DGOJ's standing enforcement powers under Ley 13/2011 are unchanged: administrative fines of up to EUR50 million, licence revocation, accessory sanctions, public naming, and blocking orders against unlicensed operators, ISPs and payment processors. Under the civil-law enforcement-theory lens, unlicensed supply in Spain is an offence under the gambling statute itself rather than a secondary licence-breach theory, reinforced by DNS/IP and payment-blocking mechanisms; no dedicated safe-harbour doctrine is evident. The enforcing instrument stack runs from the durable enabling Act (Ley 13/2011) down through implementing decrees, with the record sanctions total signaling a durable shift toward more assertive enforcement against unlicensed operators rather than a one-off spike.

ConfirmedNot reviewed · changed since expert review2 post-review updates · Not reviewedIn expert review scope10 enforcement eventsRead full analysis & tables →
11 · What is coming?

Outlook

Mixed

Outlook is mixed-to-positive. The market is growing strongly, but a draft amendment to Ley 13/2011 aims to restore the advertising restrictions annulled by the Supreme Court in 2024, and RD 176/2023's mandatory risk-detection algorithm is expected to be deployed in 2026. A voluntary cross-operator d…

Full analysis · 63 words

Outlook is mixed-to-positive. The market is growing strongly, but a draft amendment to Ley 13/2011 aims to restore the advertising restrictions annulled by the Supreme Court in 2024, and RD 176/2023's mandatory risk-detection algorithm is expected to be deployed in 2026. A voluntary cross-operator deposit-cap mechanism is also under development. Regulatory direction is tightening on player protection while easing on advertising legal certainty.

Not reviewed Information added after the 2 Sep 2026 expert review — published for currency and labelled not reviewed.
Not reviewedRead update

Two forward-dated reforms are in train for Spain. Real Decreto 520/2026's joint, cross-operator deposit-limit system takes legal effect on 25 March 2027, already enacted but not yet in force. The DGOJ's draft Resolution on a common, consent-independent risk-detection mechanism remains at consultation stage, with the reopened consultation window running 14 to 22 October 2026; the draft has been shaped by AEPD opinion 015/2026, which required a data protection impact assessment and a ban on commercial use of risk categorisations. A separately reported initiative by DGOJ or the Ministerio de Consumo to reform Ley 13/2011, Spain's foundational gambling statute, has been referenced in commentary, but no bill text has been located, so confidence that a formal legislative process has commenced remains limited. Watch the 22 October 2026 consultation close and the 25 March 2027 commencement date as the two concrete markers most likely to move the compliance picture next.

Not reviewedRead update

The dissolution of the Cortes ahead of the 29 November 2026 snap election has halted parliamentary processing of the comprehensive reform of Ley 13/2011. No Anteproyecto text has been published as of early October 2026, despite a public pre-consultation that closed on 22 June 2026 and DGOJ stakeholder meetings that ran through September 2026. The DGOJ can continue administrative and technical drafting work on the reform, but Parliament is unavailable to carry a bill through to enactment during the current legislature. Near-term regulatory change for Spain is accordingly more likely to continue arriving through royal decree or DGOJ resolution, as it did with Real Decreto 813/2026 and the advertising harm-warning resolution, than through the stalled primary-legislation track.

Not reviewedRead update

Two parallel reform tracks are active in Spain this cycle. An Anteproyecto de Ley amending Ley 13/2011, the general gambling law, is in tramitación, with the DGOJ holding meetings with sector associations in July 2026. Separately, a Proyecto de modificación of RD 304/2014, the implementing regulation for the AML statute Ley 10/2010, is also in tramitación as of Q2 2026. Together these two tracks represent a coordinated forward-looking tightening across both general gambling regulation and AML-specific implementing rules, and their progress should be monitored closely by any operator planning entry or expansion timelines in Spain.

ProbableNot reviewed3 post-review updates · Not reviewedRead full analysis & tables →
Evidential record & source register 1 enforcement · 25 red flags · 15 sources · Expand full record

Enforcement record

What the regulator has actually done, newest first. 1 recorded event.

  1. 31 Dec 2024
    DGOJ · 14 unlicensed offshore operators
    Confirmed
    Sources

What gets operators fined

25 red flags (14 high, 7 medium, 1 low) and 6 controls that address them.

  • high
    Sports sponsorship
    Sponsorship ban (RD 958/2020 art. 12) survived the 2024 annulment.
    Sources
  • high
    Broadcast advertising outside 1am–5am window
    Time-window restriction persists despite partial annulment.
    Sources
  • high
    Assuming licences are available on demand
    General licences only via periodic public tender with 18-month minimum gaps.
    Sources
  • high
    Non-EEA incorporation
    Applicants must be EEA-established as SA or equivalent.
    Sources
  • high
    Failure to register with SEPBLAC / file annual AML report
    Mandatory under Ley 10/2010; designated reporting entity obligations.
    Sources
  • high
    Anonymous payment methods
    Prohibited; full traceability required.
    Sources
  • high
    Not integrating RGIAJ self-exclusion register
    Mandatory national exclusion register integration.
    Sources
  • high
    No real-time DGOJ data integration
    RD 1613/2011 requires real-time monitoring integration.
    Sources
  • high
    Unregistered affiliate activity
    Affiliates must register with DGOJ; penalties €100k–€1m.
    Sources
  • high
    Offering unregulated game types
    Only games within statutory definitions may be offered.
    Sources
  • high
    Crypto gambling offering
    Crypto gambling unlicensed by DGOJ; outside the regulated perimeter.
    Sources
  • high
    Letting general licence lapse
    Loss of general licence voids linked singular licences.
    Sources
  • high
    Uncertified platform launch
    Platform must be certified for functionality and security pre-launch.
    Sources
  • high
    Not enforcing deposit limits
    Mandatory deposit-limit regime under amended art. 36 and RD 176/2023.
    Sources
  • medium
    Promoting bonuses to unverified players
    Welcome bonuses only to verified customers per surviving rules.
    Sources
  • medium
    Misapplying Ceuta/Melilla reduced rate
    10% rate requires genuine tax residence and effective location.
    Sources
  • medium
    Serving players outside Spain on .es licence assumptions
    Operators must geo-restrict and comply with foreign rules.
    Sources
  • medium
    Relying on 2024 advertising relaxation as permanent
    Draft Ley 13/2011 amendment seeks to restore annulled restrictions.
    Sources
  • medium
    Ignoring forthcoming risk-detection algorithm
    RD 176/2023 mandatory mechanism expected 2026.
    Sources
  • medium
    Insufficient capital / guarantees
    €100k minimum capital plus scaled economic guarantees required.
    Sources
  • medium
    Opening retail shops without autonomous-community approval
    Land-based outlets require regional approval.
    Sources
  • low
    Assuming CNJ exists as the live regulator
    CNJ never constituted; DGOJ holds all powers — address correspondence accordingly.
    Sources
  • critical
    Operating without a DGOJ licence
    Very-serious infringement; fines up to €50m, website shutdown and 2-year ban.
    Sources
  • critical
    Targeting minors / vulnerable groups
    Strict prohibitions persist regardless of annulment.
    Sources
  • critical
    Repeat unlicensed offending
    Repeat offenders faced penalties up to €10m in 2024.
    Sources

Controls

  • 001
    Tender readiness pack
    Maintain EEA SA structure, capital, guarantees and corporate documents ready for the next general-licence public call.
    Sources
  • 002
    DGOJ real-time integration
    Implement RD 1613/2011 traceability and real-time data feed to DGOJ monitoring systems.
    Sources
  • 003
    RG tooling and RGIAJ integration
    Deploy deposit limits, reality checks, safer-gambling officer and national self-exclusion register integration.
    Sources
  • 004
    Marketing compliance gate
    Pre-clear all campaigns against surviving RD 958/2020 rules — sponsorship ban, broadcast window, verified-customer bonus targeting.
    Sources
  • 005
    AML programme
    SEPBLAC registration, risk-based EDD, and annual AML report to DGOJ under Ley 10/2010.
    Sources
  • 006
    Affiliate governance
    Ensure all affiliates are DGOJ-registered and promote only licensed brands with compliant disclosures.
    Sources

Worked scenarios

5 entry scenarios, each with the move we would make.

An MGA-licensed casino operator wishes to enter Spain.

Operator must establish an EEA SA with €100k capital, await/participate in a DGOJ general-licence tender for 'other games', obtain casino singular licences, and certify its platform. Cannot lawfully serve Spanish players in the interim.

Do this: Build the corporate and technical stack now; engage Spanish counsel to monitor the next tender.

Sources

A B2B game-studio wants to supply slots to Spanish-licensed operators.

No DGOJ B2B licence exists; the studio supplies certified games to licensed B2C operators who carry the regulatory relationship. Games must pass certification within the operator's platform.

Do this: Contract with licensed operators and ensure game certification; no standalone DGOJ application required.

Sources

A licensed operator plans a football-shirt sponsorship.

Sports sponsorship remains prohibited (RD 958/2020 art. 12, not annulled). The campaign is unlawful.

Do this: Redirect spend to permitted digital/affiliate/CRM channels.

Sources

An operator considers Ceuta/Melilla establishment for the 10% tax rate.

The reduced 10% GGR rate requires genuine tax residence and effective location in Ceuta or Melilla; substance is required to avoid challenge.

Do this: Obtain tax advice on substance before relying on the reduced rate.

Sources

An affiliate promotes a non-DGOJ-licensed operator to Spanish users.

Promoting unlicensed operators is prohibited; affiliates must register and promote only licensed brands. Penalties range €100k–€1m.

Do this: Register with DGOJ and audit the operator portfolio for licence validity.

Sources

What we looked for and could not find

Confirmed absence is a finding of its own. These are the questions we searched and could not answer from a citable source, with the searches we ran. Never behind the paywall.

Entry pathways. latest tender_window details (pool_size, per_group_cap) not published since the December 2017 tender; awaiting next public call.
  • searched: DGOJ Spain next gambling licence tender 2025
  • searched: convocatoria licencias juego online España
  • searched: DGOJ general licence public tender pool size
  • checked: ordenacionjuego.es
Competitive landscape. no T1/T2 published figure for unlicensed/black-market share of the Spanish online market.
  • searched: Spain unlicensed online gambling market share estimate
  • searched: DGOJ black market gambling Spain percentage
  • searched: mercado negro juego online España cuota
  • checked: ordenacionjuego.es

Source register

Every source on a four-step tier scale. A claim is never shown at a stronger tier than the source it cites.

Claims with their own provenance

Spain online GGR reached €1,454.59 million in 2024, +17.61% YoY.

ES-CP-001 · T1 of 4 · published 24 Mar 2025 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources

Online gambling tax is 20% of GGR under Ley 13/2011 art. 48.

ES-CP-002 · T3 of 4 (asserted T2, shown at its source's tier) · published 28 May 2025 · Confirmed
Pipeline-sourced · From Advennt research · Rule detail not yet extracted
Sources